Graduate teaching assistants at research universities: current practices, challenges, and paths to improvement
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Alhija, N.-A., Fadia, & Fresko, B. (2018). Graduate teaching assistants: how well do their students think they do? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 943-954.
- Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L., & Maude, P. (2017). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), 12-16.
- Canyakan, S. (2025). Contributions of AI-Supported 3D virtual instructors to educational processes: a study on the SozyAI Model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 13(1), 33-52.
- Chan, E. S., Ho, S. K., Ip, F. F., & Wong, M. W. (2020). Self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction among teaching assistants in Hong Kong’s inclusive education. SAGE Open, 10(3), 2158244020941008.
- Darling, A. L., & Dewey, M. L. (1990). Teaching assistant socialization: Communication with peer leaders about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(4), 315-326.
- Du, C. (2015). Training systems and practices for Graduate teaching assistants in American universities. Degrees & Graduate Education(05), 67-71.
- Freeland, R. (1998). Collected Wisdom: Strategies & Resources for TAs. Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, Carnegie Mellon University.
- Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31-41.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Curriculum Development in Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Lu Zhou
*
0000-0002-9962-6948
China
Publication Date
December 30, 2025
Submission Date
July 26, 2025
Acceptance Date
October 15, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 13 Number: 4