A Case Study Investigating the Language Development Process, Early Literacy Experiences and Educational Problems of a Gifted Child

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to identify the language development process, early literacy experiences and educational problems of an early reader identified as gifted. The research method was determined as a case study in line with this objective. The research was structured on the experiences of a fourth-grade male student born in 2010 who attends the Science and Arts center and has been identified by RAM as gifted. The student was coded under name Ahmet. Ahmet’s early literacy characteristics, experiences and educational problems were examined through interviews held with Ahmet, his mother and his preschool teacher. Unstructured open-ended questions were used in the study. Categories were created on data obtained to perform a content analysis. Deductive method was employed. According to the results, Ahmet was 3.5 years old when his mother noticed that he was able to read. However, his language development was slower compared to his peers. He was around three when he moved to the two-word period.  Ahmet had learned all car models at age one. He was able to find and call his father, grandmother and aunt from his mother's phone book at age two. When he was six months old, he noticed that the illustrated children's book handed to him was upside down and set it right and focused on and examined the letters therein for a while. When he was one and a half years old, he saw his father's name's initial letter Z on the wall and began to bounce crying “here is dad, here is dad.” He had problems of adaptation with his friends when he started kindergarten. Ahmet enjoys buying books, spending time at bookstores, visiting libraries, but experiences problems since he grows impatient about finishing a book he has started. He is more attracted to the images than the letters in the books. Book covers help him predict the book, and he sometimes designs his own covers for books he reads. 

Keywords

• Early literacy,gifted

References

1. References
2. Afat, N. (2017). Ustun Zekâli ve Ozel Yetenekli Bireylerin Egitiminde Destek Egitim Odalarinin Incelenmesi [Examination of Resourse Rooms in the Training of Gifted and Talented Individuals]. Researcher: Social Science Studies, 5(9), 294-303.
3. Afat N. & Kadıoglu Ates, H. (2017). Turkiye’de Yapilan Lisansustu Tezlerde “Ustun Zeka ve Yetenek” ile “Ozel Yetenek” Kavramlarinin Tercih Edilme Durumlari, [Outgoing graduate theses in Turkey "superior intelligence and talent" with "Special Abilities" Preference for Status of Concept] Yüksek Ogretimde Egitim ve Uygulamaları Kongresi YEAUK 2017, 19-20 May, İstanbul.
4. Akarsu, F. (2001). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar:Aileleri ve sorunları [Gifted children: their families and their problems]. Ankara: Eduser.
5. Aktan Acar, E. (2017). (Ed.). Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Mozaiği Büyük Düşünceler, Fikirler, Modeller ve Yaklaşımlar [Early Childhood Education Mothers Great Thinkers, Ideas, Models and Approaches]. Ankara: Nobel.
6. Altınkaynak, Ş. Ö. & Akman, B. (2016). Aile Temelli Okuma Yazmaya Hazirlik Programinin Çocuklarin Okuma Yazmaya Hazirlik Becerilerine Etkisi [Impact of Family Based Reading and Writing Program on Children's Readiness to Read Literacy Skills]. Egitim ve Bilim, 41 (186): 185-204.
7. Altun, D. & Tantekin Erden, F. (2016). Okul Oncesi Ogretmen Adaylarinin Erken Okuryazarlik ile Ilgili Gorusleri ve Staj Uygulamalari [Pre-school Teacher Candidates' Early Literacy Views and Internship Practices]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 17(1), 241-261.
8. Altunisik, R., Coşkun, R., Yildirim, E. & Bayraktaroglu, S. (2001). Sosyal Bilimlerde Arastirma Yontemleri [Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Adapazari: Sakarya.

9. Asici, M. (2009). Kisisel ve sosyal bir deger olarak okuryazarlik [Literacy as a personal and social value]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(17), 9-26.
10. Atlar, H. & Uzuner, Y. (2018). Okul oncesi donemdeki isitme kayipli bir cocugun gelisen okuryazarlik yasantilarinin incelenmesi [Examination of developing literacy scenes of a child with a hearing loss in school]. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(1), 54-89. DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c1s3m.
11. Aydin, A. (2014). Egitim psikolojisi gelisim ogrenme ogretim [Education psychology development learning]. (13th Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
12. Aydogan,Y. (2015). Dil Gelisimi [Literacy Development]. Yasemin Aydogan, Arzu Ozyurek & Gulumser Gultesakin Akduman (Edts). Erken Cocukluk Doneminde Gelisim [Development in early childhood]. (Pages 139-162). Ankara: Vize.
13. Aydogan, Y. (2017). (Ed.). Dunyada Erken Cocukluk Egitimi [Early Childhood Education in the World]. Ankara: Nobel.
14. Bacanli, H. (2015). Egitim psikolojisi [Education psychology]. (22th Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
15. Baki, Y. & Karakuş, N. (2012). Turkce Ogretiminde Ogretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarimi [Teaching Technologies and Material Design in Turkish Education]. Ankara: Pegem.
16. Balcı, A. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Arastirma Yontem, Teknik ve Ilkeler [Research Methods, Techniques and Principles in Social Sciences] (11th Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
17. Basturk, M. (2013). Anadil Edinimi [Acquisition of Mother tongue]. Ankara: Pegem.
18. Bernhardt, B., & Major, E. (2005). Speech, language and literacy skills 3 years later: a follow‐up study of early phonological and metaphonological intervention. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(1), 1-27.
19. Bowyer‐Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J., ... & Hulme, C. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422-432.
20. Bredekamp, S. (2015). Erken Cocukluk Egitiminde Etkili Uygulamalar [Effective Practices in Early Childhood Education]. (Second edition). Hatice Zeynep Inan & Taşkın Inan (Translate edts). Ankara: Nobel, Pearson.
21. Bulut, K. & Coskun, H. (2018). Kirsal Kesime Atanan Turkce ve Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Meslege Uyum Sureci [Rural Cutting Occupational Adaptation of the Assigned Turkic and Class Teachers Sureci]. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 159-185, doi: 10.23863/kalem.2018.99
22. Buyukozturk, Ş., Kilic Cakmak, E.., Akgun, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (19th Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
23. Cabuk, B. (2015). Erken Okuryazarlık Erken Mi? [Is Early Literacy Early?] 4. Uluslararası Okul Öncesi Eğitimi Kongresi, 02-04 September, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
24. Caglar, D. (2004). Okulda Basarisiz Olan Ustun Zekali Cocuklar [Gifted children who fail at school]. In M. R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu, & A. E. Bilgili (Ed.). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar seçilmiş makaleler kitabı [Gifted children's books of selected boks] (pp. 409-415). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfi.
25. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Arastirma Yontemleri Desen ve Analiz [Research Methods Pattern and Analysis](Translate Ahmet Aypay). (2nd Edition). Ankara: Ani.
26. Cutts, N. E., Moseley, N., & Ersevim, İ. (2001). Ustun Zekali Ve Yetenekli Cocuklarin Egitimi: Ulusun En Buyuk Kaynaklarindan Birinin Harcanmasi Nasil Onlenir? [Education of gifted and talented children: how to avoid spending one of the greatest resources of the nation]. İstanbul: Ozgur.
27. Davasligil, U. (2004). Ustun cocuklar [Gifted children]. In R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu ve AE Bilgili (Ed.), Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar:Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı [Gifted Children: Selected Book], (pages. 211-218). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı, 63.
28. Davasligil, U., & Leana, M. Z. (2004). Ustun Zekâlilarin Egitimi Projesi [Education of gifted students]. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi, Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Bildiri Kitabı, İstanbul.
29. Davasligil, U., Aslan, E., & Beskardes, Ü. (2000). Ustun ve Ozel Yetenekli Cocuklara Iliskin Alt Komisyonu [Subcommittee on superior and special talented children]. In S. Usta, MR Şirin (prepared by), I. İstanbul Çocuk Kurultayı Projeler Kitabı, 291-304.
30. Davis, G. A. (2014). Ustun Yetenekli Cocuklar ve Egitimi [Gifted Children and Education]. (Translate Müjde Isik Genc). Istanbul: Ozgur.
31. Deniz, M. E. (2016). Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Gelişim [Early Childhood Development]. Ankara: Maya.
32. Donmezer, İ. (2012). Cocukluk ve Ergenlik Doneminde Gorulen Bazi Gelisim Ozellikleri ya da Sorunlari ve Cozum Onerileri [Some developmental characteristics or problems seen during childhood and adolescence, and suggestions for solutions]. Eda Kargi (Ed.). Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Gelişim [Early Childhood Development]. (pages 90-104). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
33. Ergul, Ç., Dolunay Sarıca A. & Akoglu, G. (2016). Etkilesimli Kitap Okuma: Dil ve Erken Okuryazarlik Becerilerinin Gelistirilmesinde Etkili Bir Yontem [Interactive Book Reading: An Effective Method of Improving Language and Early Literacy Skills]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 17(2), 193-204.
34. Ergul, C., Karaman, G., Akoglu, G., Tufan, M., Sarica, A. D., & Kudret, Z. B. (2014). Okul Oncesi Ogretmenlerinin “Erken Okuryazarlik” Kavramina Iliskin Bilgi Duzeyleri Ve Sinif Uygulamalari [The level of knowledge and classroom practices of pre-school teachers regarding the concept of Early Literacy]. İlköğretim Online, 13(4).1449-147. [Online]:http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr DOI: 10.17051/io.2014.71858
35. Esters, I. G., Ittenbach, R. F., & Han, K. (1997). Today's IQ Tests: Are They Really Better Than Their Historical Predecessors?. School Psychology Review, 26(2), 211-24.
36. Farver, J. A. M., Lonigan, C. J., & Eppe, S. (2009). Effective early literacy skill development for young Spanish‐speaking English language learners: An experimental study of two methods. Child development, 80(3), 703-719.
37. Fielding-Barnsley, R., and Purdie, N. (2002) Developing Pre-Literacy Skills via Shared Book Reading. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3):13-19.
38. Freeman, J. (Ed.). (1985). The psychology of gifted children: Perspectives on development and education. Chichester [West Sussex]; New York: Wiley.
39. Gagne, M. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15(4), 372-390.
40. Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High ability studies, 15(2), 119-147.
41. Gunes, F. (2017). Okuma Ilgisi ve Gucu [Reading Interest and Power]. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3):119-128.
42. Gurpinar, N. (2006). Bilissel Degerlendirme Sistemi'nin (CAS) 8 Yaş Grubu Icin On Norm Calismasi ve Ustun Zekâlı ve Yetenekli Ogrencilerin Bilissel Degerlendirilmesi [The Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) is a pre-norm study for the 8-year-old group and the cognitive assessment of gifted and talented students]. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, (Unpublished master thesis), İstanbul Üniversitesi.
43. Halsted, J. W. (1988). Guiding Gifted Readers: From Preschool Through High School: a Handbook for Parents, Teachers, Counselors, and Librarians. Ohio Psychology Publications.
44. Hamarta, E. Arslan, C. & Yilmaz, H. (2016). Eğitim Psikolojisi [Education psychology]. (3rd Edition). Konya: Cizgi.
45. Hawkins, S. (1983). Reading interests of gifted children. Reading Horizons, 24(1), 3.
46. Jackson, N.E. (1992). Precocious reading of English: Origins, structure, and predictive significance. In P.S. Klein & J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), To be young and gifted (pp. 171–203). New Jersey: Ablex
47. Kadioglu, H. (2012). Bitişik Eğik Yazıya İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri [Opinions of students about the adjoining oblique writing]. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 31, 1-10.
48. Kadioglu, S. (2017). Ustun Yeteneklilerin Sosyal ve Duygusal Sorunlari: Bir Alanyazin Taramasi [Social and Emotional Issues of Gifted Talents: A Literary Survey], Yükseköğretimde Eğitim Araştırmaları ve Uygulamaları Kongresi YEAUK 2017, 19-20 May, İstanbul.
49. Kadioglu Ates, H. (2015). Ilkokul Birinci Sinif Ogrencilerinin Bitisik Egik Yazilarinin Yazma Ozelliklerinin İliskileri Acisindan İncelenmesi [Investigation of the Relevance of Writing Characteristics of Adjacent Curve Writings of Primary School First Grade Students]. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(17):200-219.
50. Kadioglu Ates, H. (2016). Erken Çocukluk Döneminden Ilkokula Dinleme Becerisinin Gelisimi [Development of Early Childhood Listening Ability] Ömer Özyılmaz & Hatice Kadıoglu Ates (Edts). Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Disiplinler Arası Bakıs, (pages 293-329). Lambert Academic Publishing LAP: Germany Deutschland.
51. Kadioglu Ates H., Akyol R. & Celik, S. (2017). Ustun Yetenekli Bireyler ve Egitimleri Hakkinda Universite Ogrencilerinin Gorusleri (IZU Örnegi) [Views of University Students about Highly Talented Individuals and Their Trainings (IZU Exemple)]. Yüksekögretimde Egitim Arastırmaları ve Uygulamaları Kongresi YEAUK 2017, 19-20 Mayıs, İstanbul.
52. Kadioglu Ates, H. & Mazi M. G. (2017). Turkiye’de Ustün Yetenekliler Egitimi Ile Ilgili Yapılan Lisansustu Tezlere Genel Bir Bakis [With Turkey in the Gifted and Talented Education carried out an overview of the relevant Graduate Thesis.]. Üstün Zekâlılar Egitimi ve Yaratıcılık Dergisi, 4(3), 33-57.
53. Kadioglu Ates H. (2018). Problems of Gifted and Talented Students Regarding Cursive Handwriting: Parent Opinions. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 293-299 Doi:10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.293
54. Kadioglu Ates, H.,Turk E.,Ozfidan M. (2017). Ozel Yetenekli Ogrencilerin Ogretmenlerinin Hangi Ozelliklere Sahip Olmasi Gerektigine Iliskin Ogretmen ve Ebeveyn Goruslerinin Incelenmesi [Examination of Teacher and Parental Opinions Involving Which Teachers of Special Talented Students Need to Own]. Uluslararası Özel Yetenekliler Kongresi (ÖZYEK 2017), 7-9 April, İstanbul.
55. Karaman, G. & Gungor Aytar, A. (2016). Erken Okuryazarlik Becerilerini Degerlendirme Araci’nin (EOBDA) Gelistirilmesi [Development of the Early Literacy Skills Assessment Tool (EOBDA)]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2): 516-541.
56. Karasar N. (2015). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi [Scientific Research Method]. Ankara: Nobel.
57. Karatay, H. (2014). Okuma Egitimi Kuram ve Uygulama [Reading Education Theory and Practice] (2nd Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
58. Kargı, E. (2012). Erken Cocukluk Doneminde Gelisim [Development in early childhood]. (Ed.). Ankara: Pegem.
59. Kargin, T., Ergul, C., Buyukozturk, Ş., & Güldenoglu, B. (2015). Anasinifi Cocuklarina Yonelik Erken Okuryazarlik Testi (EROT) Gelistirme Calismasi, [Early Literacy Test (EROT) Development Study for Preschool Children]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 16(03), 237-268.
60. Kazak, N.(2001). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri [Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
61. Kurudayioglu, M., & Tuzel, A. G. M. S. (2010). 21. Yuzyil Okuryazarlik Turleri, Degisen Metin Algisi ve Turkce Egitimi [21st century literacy types, changing text sense and Turkish education]. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 28(28), 283-298.
62. Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 36(5), 596-613.
63. Mangır, M. (2012). Ilkogretim 5. Sinif Turkce Ders Kitabindaki Deyim Varliginin Ogrencilerin Alici Soz Varligina Katkisi [Contribution of the Idiom Existence of the 5th Grade Turkish Language Coursebook to the Buyers' Words of Primary Education]. Turkish Studies -International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7(4): 2371-2385.
64. MEB [MoNE] (2007). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi [Science and arts center directive]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basimevi.
65. Melanlioglu, D. (2012). Dinleme Becerisinin Gelistirilmesinde Ailenin Rolu [The Role of Family in the Development of Listening Skills], Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları, 12(7):65-77.
66. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (2015). Nitel Veri Analizi [Qualitative Data Analysis]. (Translate from second edition). (Translate edts. Sadegül Akbaba Altun & Ali Ersoy). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
67. Morelock, M. J. (1992). Giftedness: The view from within. Understanding our gifted, 4(3), 1:11-15.
68. Mönks, F. J., & van Boxtel, H. W. (1985). Gifted adolescents: A developmental perspective. The psychology of gifted children, 275-295.
69. Nar, B. & Tortop, H. S. (2017). Turkiye’de Ozel/Ustun Yetenekli Ogrenciler İcin Destek Egitim Odasi Uygulamasi: Sorunlar ve Oneriler [Turkey Private / Gifted Support Training Room for Students Practice: Problems and Suggestions]. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1):85-99.
70. Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (2018). Erken Okuryazarlik Arastirmalari El Kitabi [Early Literacy Research Handbook] Gözde Akoğlu & Cevriye Ergül (Trans. Eds.). Ankara: Nobel.
71. Ozbek Ayaz, C. (2015). Ailelerin, Okul Oncesi Donemdeki Cocuklarinin Okuryazarlik Becerilerini Desteklemek İcin Kullandiklari Okuryazarlik Uygulamalarinin İncelenmesi: Tekirdağ İli Örneği [Examination of Literacy Practices Used by Families to Promote Literacy Skills in Preschool Children: The Case of Tekirdağ Province], Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi [Unpublished master thesis], Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu.
72. Ozenc, E. G., & Ozenc, M. (2013). Turkiye’de Ustun Yetenekli Ogrencilerle Ilgili Yapilan Lisansustu Egitim Tezlerinin Cok Boyutlu Olarak Incelenmesi [Education Graduate Thesis Investigation of Multi-Dimensional Video of the Gifted Students in Turkey]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 171(171), 13-28.
73. Ozbek Ayaz, C., Gulec, H., & Sahin C. (2015). Ailelerin, Cocuklarıyla Gerceklestirdikleri Okuryazarlik Uygulamalari Arasindaki Farkliliklari Belirleme [Identifying the Differences Between Literacy Practices and Their Children's Practices], The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 41:543-560, Doi number:http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3203
74. Ozturk, A. (2005). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumlarında Ana Dili Etkinlikleri [Mother Language Activities in Pre-school Education Institutions]. Ankara: Nobel.
75. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Arastirma ve Degerlendirme Yontemleri [Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods]. (Translate from third edition) (Trans. edts. Mesut BÜTÜN & Selçuk Beşir DEMİR). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
76. Polat, Ö. (2011). Okul Oncesinde Ilkogretime Hazirlik [Ilkogretime Preparation Before School]. Istanbul: Morpa.
77. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
78. Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2006). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Sourcebooks, Inc..
79. Roe, B. D., Ross, E. P., & Burns, P. C. (1984). Student teaching and field experiences handbook. CE Merrill Publishing Company.
80. Roeper, A. (1982). How the gifted cope with their emotions. Roeper Review, 5(2), 21-24.
81. Sak, U. (2014). Ustun zekalilar [Gifted]. Ankara: Vize.
82. Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2003). The long-term predictive validity of a performance-based assessment used to identify gifted CLD students. In Proceedings of the 15th Biennial World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Students. World Council for Gifted and Talented Students Adelaide, Australia.
83. Saranli, A. G., & Metin, N. (2012). Ustun Yetenekli Cocuklarda Gozlenen Sosyal-Duygusal Sorunlar [Social-Emotional Issues Observed in Gifted Children]. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 45(1): 139-163.
84. San Bayhan, P. & Artan, İ. (2014). Cocuk Gelisimi ve Egitimi [Child Development and Education]. İstanbul: Morpa.
85. Seggie, F. N. ve Bayyurt, Y. (2015). Nitel Arastirma Yontem, Teknik, Analiz ve Yaklasimlari [Qualitative Research Methods, Techniques, Analysis and Approaches]. Ankara: Ani.
86. Seven, S. (2015). Cocuk Gelisimi. (Edt.). Ankara: Vize.
87. Silverman, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love Publishing.
88. Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-292.
89. Sonmez Kartal, M. (2017). İsmi Kadar Sempatik Bir Program: Hippy (Home Intervention Program for Preschool Youngsters), Ebru Aktan Acar (Ed.), Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Mozaiği Büyük düşünceler, Fikirler, Modeller ve Yaklaşımlar (pages 231-238). Ankara: Nobel.
90. Sonmez, V. & Alacapinar, F. G. (2014). Orneklendirilmis Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri [Sampled Scientific Research Methods]. (3rd Edition). Ankara: Ani.
91. Sousa, David. (2003). How the gifted brain works. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
92. Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Wagner, R. K., Horvath, J. A., Williams, W. M., ... & Grigorenko, E. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
93. Swanton, S. I. (1984). Minds Alive--What and Why Gifted Students Read for Pleasure. School Library Journal, 30(7), 99-102.
94. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan College.
95. Thorndike, E. L., Lay, W., & Dean, P. R. (1909). The relation of accuracy in sensory discrimination to general intelligence. The American Journal of Psychology, 20(3), 364-369.
96. Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). Ustun Zekalı ve Yetenekli Ogrencilerin Bulunduğu Siniflarda Karma Ogretim [How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms]. Serap Emir & Ahmet Aksu (Trans.). Ankara: Ani.
97. Tortop, H. S., & Dincer, S. (2016). Destek Egitim Odalarinda Ustun/Ozel Yetenekli Ogrencilerle Calisan Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Uygulama Hakkindaki Gorusleri [Special Talented Students in Supportive Learning Centers Opinions of Working Classroom Teachers about Practice]. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (UYAD), 4(2):11-28.
98. Tortop, H.S., & Kunt, K. (2013). Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin ustun yeteneklilerin egitimine ilisskin tutumlarinin incelenmesi [An examination of the attitudes of primary school teachers towards the education of the gifted]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 441-45.
99. Tortop, H. S. (2018). Ustun Zekalilar Egitiminde Farklilastirilmis Ogretim Mufredat Farklilastirma Modelleri [Differentiated Instruction in Gifted Education Curriculum Differentiation Models]. (2nd Edition). İstanbul: Genç Bilge.
100. Trawick- Smith, J. (2017). Erken Cocukluk Doneminde Gelisim Cok Kulturlu Bir Bakis Acisi [Early Childhood Development A Multicultural Perspective]. Berrin Akman (Çeviri Ed.). (5th Edition). Ankara: Nobel.
101. Turan T. (2001). Dinleme Becerisi [Listening Skill]. Ataman, A. (Ed.). Konu Alanı Ders Kitabı İnceleme Kılavuzu Türkçe 1-8. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
102. Turan, F. (2012). Iletisim, Dil ve Konuşma Bozuklugu Olan Cocuklar [Children with Communication, Language and Speech Disorders]. Nilgün Metin (Ed.). Özel Gereksinimli Çocuklar. (pages 143-185). Ankara: Maya Akademi.
103. Turkdogan, O. & Gokce, O. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemi. (2nd Edition). Konya: Cizgi.
104. Turnuklu, A. (2000). Egitimbilim Arastirmalarında Etkin Olarak Kullanilabilecek Nitel Bir Arastirma Teknigi: Gorusme [A Qualitative Research Technique to be Effectively Used in Educational Research: Interview]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(4), 543-559.
105. Uyanik, O. & Kandir, A. (2010). Okul Oncesi Donemde Erken Akademik Beceriler [Early Academic Skills in the Preschool Period]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 3 (2), 118-134.
106. Ustun, E. (2007). Okul Oncesi Cocuklarının Okuma Yazma Becerilerinin Gelişimi [Development of Literacy Skills for Preschool Children]. Istanbul: Morpa.
107. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D. T., Hughes, C. E., & Boyce, L. N. (1996). A study of language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Talents and Gifts, 19(4), 461-480.
108. Vatansever Bayraktar H., Kadioglu Ates H., & Afat N. (2018). Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Ozel Yetenekli Bireylerin Egitimine Ilişkin Ozyeterlikleri ve Tutumlarının Iliskisi [Relation of Self-Efficacy and Attitudes of Class Teachers to the Training of Special Talented Individuals], UTEK 2018, 29-31 March 2018, Bursa.
109. Whitmore, K. F., Martens, P., Goodman, Y. M., & Owocki, G. (2004). Critical lessons from the transactional perspective on early literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(3), 291-325.
110. Yazici, E., & Kandir, A. (2018). Erken Okuryazarlik Becerilerinin Ev Ortamında Desteklenmesine Iliskin Calismalarin Incelenmesi [Investigation of the Supporting of Early Literacy Skills in the Home Environment]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 38(1), 101-135.
111. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5th Edition). Ankara: Seckin.
112. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin.
113. Yildizli, H., Erdol, T. A., Bastug, M., & Bayram, K. (2018). Turkiye’de Ogretmen Kavrami Uzerine Yapilan Metafor Arastirmalarina Yonelik Bir Meta-Sentez Calismasi [Made to orientations such turkiyede Ogretmen Concept Metaphor Research them a Meta-Synthesis çalışması]. Egitim ve Bilim, 43(193), 1-43.