Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, , 1055 - 1073, 15.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.609603

Abstract

References

  • Abikoff, H., & Gallagher, R. (2009). COSS: Children’s organiza-tional skills scale. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Anesko, K. M., Schoiock, G., Ramirez, R., &Levine, F. M. (1987). The Homework Problem Check-list: Assessing children's homework difficulties. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 179-185.
  • Barkley, R. A., Grodzinsky, G., and DuPaul, G. J. (1992). Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: A review and research report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20: 163–188.
  • Bjorklund, D., &Harnishfeger, K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48-71.
  • Brady, N. C. (1997). The teaching game: A reciprocal peer tutoring program for preschool children. Education and Treatment of Children, 20(2), 123-149.
  • Bynner J. (1997). Basic skills in adolescents’ occupational preparation. Career Dev Quart. 45:305–321.
  • Carlson, C. L., Booth, J. E., Shin, M., and Canu, W. H. (2002). Parent-, teacher-, and self-rated motivational styles in ADHD subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35: 104-113.
  • Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control and reading disability. Memory and Cognition, 28, 8-17.
  • Cihak, David. (2009). Using Video Modeling via Handheld Computers to Improve Geometry Skills for High School Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology. 24. 17-29. 10.1177/016264340902400402.
  • Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., Woodward, L.J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Dev Psychol. Sep; 46(5): 1176-1191. doi: 10.1037/a0019672.
  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83.
  • Decker, M. M., & Buggey, T. (2014). Using video self- and peer modeling to facilitate reading fluency in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 167–177. doi:10.1177/002221941- 2450618
  • Duncan, G. J. 2011. “The Importance of KindergartenEntry Academic Skills.” In The Pre-K Debates: Current Controversies and Issues, ed. E. Zigler, W.S. Gilliam, and W.S. Barnett. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • DuPaul, G. J., & Henningson, P. N. (1993). Peer tutoring effects on the classroom performance of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Review, 22(1), 134-143.
  • Eiserman, W. D. (1988). Three types of peer tutoring: Effects on the attitudes of students with learning disabilities and their regular class peers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21 (4), 249-252.
  • Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., Foley, R. M., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Homework: A comparison of teachers' and parents' perceptions of the problems experienced by students identified as having behavioral disorders, learning disabilities, or no disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 40-50.
  • Franca, V. M., Kerr, M. M., Reitz, A. L., & Lambert, D. (1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 109-128.
  • Fuchs LS, Fuchs D, Prentice K, Hamlett CL, Finelli R, Courey SJ. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96:635-647.
  • Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2018). Single-Subject Research Methodology: Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294-298.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
  • Gök, T. (2018). The Evaluation of Conceptual Learning and Problem-Solving Achievement of Students by Peer Instruction. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20:1, 18-32.
  • Gökalp, M. (2018). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri. III. Baskı, Pegem Akademi.
  • Hanson BR. (1978). The effects of a contingent light flash on stuttering and attention to stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders.; 11:451-458.
  • Haroldson SK, Martin RR, Starr CD. (1968). Timeout as a punishment for stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.; 14:356-364.
  • Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Waschbusch, D. A., Kipp, H., and Owens, J. S. (2001). Academic task persistence of normally achieving ADHD and control boys: Performance, self-evaluations, and attributions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69: 271-283.
  • Jitendra AK, Griffin CC, Haria P, Leh J, Adams A, Kaduvettoor A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. 99:115-127.
  • Jitendra, A. K. (2002). Teaching students math problem solving through graphic representations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(4), 34-38.
  • Jitendra, A. K., DiPipi, C. M., & Grasso, E. (2001). The role of a graphic representational technique on the mathematical problem solving performance of fourth graders: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Special Education, 25, 17-33.
  • Jitendra, A. K., DiPipi, C. M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of word problem solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23-38
  • Kazdin, A. E., &Kopel, S. A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy, 6, 601-608.
  • Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., McBurnett, K, Biederman, J., Greenhill, L., Hynd, G. W., et al. (1994). DSM-IV field trial for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1673-1685.
  • Langberg, J.M., Vaughn, A.J., Williamson, P. et al. School Mental Health (2011) 3: 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-011-9055-8
  • Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., Flory, K., Liu, R., & Glass, K. (2011). Prospective association of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use and abuse/dependence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 328-341.
  • Light, P. L., & Littleton, K. (1999). Social processes in children’s learning (pp. 91-100). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mash, J., and Barkley, R. A. (2003). Child psychopathology (2nd ed.). Guilford Press, New York.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., et al. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40, 130-137.
  • Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
  • Odom, S. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53-61.
  • Olympia, D. E., Jenson, W. R, & Hepworth-Neville, M. (1996). Sanity savers for parents: Tips for tackling homework. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
  • Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. J. (2007) Percent of all nonoverlapping data PAND: An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194-204.
  • Parsons S, Bynner J. (1997). Numeracy and employment. Education & Training, 39:43–51.
  • Power, T. J., Karustis, J. L., & Habboushe, D. F. (2001). Homework success for children with ADHD: A family-school intervention program. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Reed CG, Godden AL. (1977). An experimental treatment using verbal punishment with two preschool stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders.; 2: 225-233.
  • Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pç. 153-196). New York: Academic Press
  • Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.
  • Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2015). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1) 96–112. doi: 10.1177/0022219413508324
  • Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
  • Siegler, R., Duncan, G., Davis-Kean, P., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Susperreguy, M. I., & Chen, M. (2012). Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement. Psychological science. 23. 691-7.
  • Slavin, S. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
  • Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
  • Swanson, J. M., Sergeant, J. A., Taylor, E., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Jensen, P. S. & Cantwell, D. P. (1998) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Lancet 351: 429-33.
  • Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215-266). San Diego, CA: Academic
  • Taylor, E. (1998) Clinical foundations of hyperactivity research. Behavioral Brain Research 94:11-24.
  • Xin, Y. P. (2003). A comparison of two instructional approaches on mathematical word problem solving by students with learning problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • Yakubova, G., Hughes, E. M., & Hornberger, E. (2015). Video-based intervention in teaching fraction problem-solving to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2865-2875.
  • Yakubova, G., Hughes, E. M., & Shinaberry, M. (2016). Learning with technology: Video modeling with concrete, representational, abstract sequence for students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2349-2362.

The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving

Year 2019, , 1055 - 1073, 15.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.609603

Abstract

When core mathematic instruction is not enough to address skill deficits of students with ADHD, more intensive interventions are required to support student learning and comprehensive interventions with strong instructional components may use to help improve achievement of students with mathematics difficulties. As individual components are found effective according to the literature, a combination of interventions may be used to develop a comprehensive treatment to enhance outcome for students with wide-ranging academic deficits in ADHD.   This study aimed to extend the use of VBI by using POVM, schema based-word problem solving method and peer tutoring to teach change, group, and compare type addition-subtraction word problem solving to students with ADHD. The instruction was anchored in use of concrete representations of schema to model conceptual understanding of word problem solving. The video presentation of the instruction via POVM allows for development of procedural knowledge as participants can view instruction of problem-solving steps. A single-case multiple probe across participants, experimental design was used with three participants. Participants were given a laptop connected to headphones. The video was preloaded on the laptop and participants started and stopped the intervention independently. After watching the video, participants completed the three different types of word addition and subtraction problems independently. Sessions were monitored and videotaped by the author to ensure videos were viewed in their entirety and at least two weeks after completion of the intervention, participants were given a maintenance assessment. All participants were successful and shared that they enjoyed learning about word problem solving using the video instruction, supporting the social validity of this intervention. 

References

  • Abikoff, H., & Gallagher, R. (2009). COSS: Children’s organiza-tional skills scale. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Anesko, K. M., Schoiock, G., Ramirez, R., &Levine, F. M. (1987). The Homework Problem Check-list: Assessing children's homework difficulties. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 179-185.
  • Barkley, R. A., Grodzinsky, G., and DuPaul, G. J. (1992). Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: A review and research report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20: 163–188.
  • Bjorklund, D., &Harnishfeger, K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48-71.
  • Brady, N. C. (1997). The teaching game: A reciprocal peer tutoring program for preschool children. Education and Treatment of Children, 20(2), 123-149.
  • Bynner J. (1997). Basic skills in adolescents’ occupational preparation. Career Dev Quart. 45:305–321.
  • Carlson, C. L., Booth, J. E., Shin, M., and Canu, W. H. (2002). Parent-, teacher-, and self-rated motivational styles in ADHD subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35: 104-113.
  • Chiappe, P., Hasher, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2000). Working memory, inhibitory control and reading disability. Memory and Cognition, 28, 8-17.
  • Cihak, David. (2009). Using Video Modeling via Handheld Computers to Improve Geometry Skills for High School Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology. 24. 17-29. 10.1177/016264340902400402.
  • Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., Woodward, L.J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Dev Psychol. Sep; 46(5): 1176-1191. doi: 10.1037/a0019672.
  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83.
  • Decker, M. M., & Buggey, T. (2014). Using video self- and peer modeling to facilitate reading fluency in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 167–177. doi:10.1177/002221941- 2450618
  • Duncan, G. J. 2011. “The Importance of KindergartenEntry Academic Skills.” In The Pre-K Debates: Current Controversies and Issues, ed. E. Zigler, W.S. Gilliam, and W.S. Barnett. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • DuPaul, G. J., & Henningson, P. N. (1993). Peer tutoring effects on the classroom performance of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. School Psychology Review, 22(1), 134-143.
  • Eiserman, W. D. (1988). Three types of peer tutoring: Effects on the attitudes of students with learning disabilities and their regular class peers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21 (4), 249-252.
  • Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., Foley, R. M., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Homework: A comparison of teachers' and parents' perceptions of the problems experienced by students identified as having behavioral disorders, learning disabilities, or no disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 40-50.
  • Franca, V. M., Kerr, M. M., Reitz, A. L., & Lambert, D. (1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 109-128.
  • Fuchs LS, Fuchs D, Prentice K, Hamlett CL, Finelli R, Courey SJ. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96:635-647.
  • Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (Eds.). (2018). Single-Subject Research Methodology: Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1993). Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science, 4, 294-298.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
  • Gök, T. (2018). The Evaluation of Conceptual Learning and Problem-Solving Achievement of Students by Peer Instruction. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20:1, 18-32.
  • Gökalp, M. (2018). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri. III. Baskı, Pegem Akademi.
  • Hanson BR. (1978). The effects of a contingent light flash on stuttering and attention to stuttering. Journal of Communication Disorders.; 11:451-458.
  • Haroldson SK, Martin RR, Starr CD. (1968). Timeout as a punishment for stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.; 14:356-364.
  • Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Waschbusch, D. A., Kipp, H., and Owens, J. S. (2001). Academic task persistence of normally achieving ADHD and control boys: Performance, self-evaluations, and attributions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69: 271-283.
  • Jitendra AK, Griffin CC, Haria P, Leh J, Adams A, Kaduvettoor A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. 99:115-127.
  • Jitendra, A. K. (2002). Teaching students math problem solving through graphic representations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(4), 34-38.
  • Jitendra, A. K., DiPipi, C. M., & Grasso, E. (2001). The role of a graphic representational technique on the mathematical problem solving performance of fourth graders: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Special Education, 25, 17-33.
  • Jitendra, A. K., DiPipi, C. M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of word problem solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23-38
  • Kazdin, A. E., &Kopel, S. A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy, 6, 601-608.
  • Lahey, B. B., Applegate, B., McBurnett, K, Biederman, J., Greenhill, L., Hynd, G. W., et al. (1994). DSM-IV field trial for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1673-1685.
  • Langberg, J.M., Vaughn, A.J., Williamson, P. et al. School Mental Health (2011) 3: 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-011-9055-8
  • Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., Flory, K., Liu, R., & Glass, K. (2011). Prospective association of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and substance use and abuse/dependence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 328-341.
  • Light, P. L., & Littleton, K. (1999). Social processes in children’s learning (pp. 91-100). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mash, J., and Barkley, R. A. (2003). Child psychopathology (2nd ed.). Guilford Press, New York.
  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., et al. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40, 130-137.
  • Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
  • Odom, S. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53-61.
  • Olympia, D. E., Jenson, W. R, & Hepworth-Neville, M. (1996). Sanity savers for parents: Tips for tackling homework. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
  • Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. J. (2007) Percent of all nonoverlapping data PAND: An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194-204.
  • Parsons S, Bynner J. (1997). Numeracy and employment. Education & Training, 39:43–51.
  • Power, T. J., Karustis, J. L., & Habboushe, D. F. (2001). Homework success for children with ADHD: A family-school intervention program. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Reed CG, Godden AL. (1977). An experimental treatment using verbal punishment with two preschool stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders.; 2: 225-233.
  • Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pç. 153-196). New York: Academic Press
  • Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.
  • Shin, M., & Bryant, D. P. (2015). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1) 96–112. doi: 10.1177/0022219413508324
  • Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
  • Siegler, R., Duncan, G., Davis-Kean, P., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Susperreguy, M. I., & Chen, M. (2012). Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement. Psychological science. 23. 691-7.
  • Slavin, S. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
  • Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
  • Swanson, J. M., Sergeant, J. A., Taylor, E., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., Jensen, P. S. & Cantwell, D. P. (1998) Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder. Lancet 351: 429-33.
  • Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215-266). San Diego, CA: Academic
  • Taylor, E. (1998) Clinical foundations of hyperactivity research. Behavioral Brain Research 94:11-24.
  • Xin, Y. P. (2003). A comparison of two instructional approaches on mathematical word problem solving by students with learning problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • Yakubova, G., Hughes, E. M., & Hornberger, E. (2015). Video-based intervention in teaching fraction problem-solving to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2865-2875.
  • Yakubova, G., Hughes, E. M., & Shinaberry, M. (2016). Learning with technology: Video modeling with concrete, representational, abstract sequence for students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2349-2362.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Differentiated Instruction
Authors

Gül Kahveci This is me 0000-0002-1300-7397

Hasan Altun 0000-0002-5943-356X

Publication Date December 15, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Kahveci, G., & Altun, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1055-1073. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.609603
AMA Kahveci G, Altun H. The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving. JEGYS. December 2019;7(4):1055-1073. doi:10.17478/jegys.609603
Chicago Kahveci, Gül, and Hasan Altun. “The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students With ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7, no. 4 (December 2019): 1055-73. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.609603.
EndNote Kahveci G, Altun H (December 1, 2019) The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7 4 1055–1073.
IEEE G. Kahveci and H. Altun, “The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving”, JEGYS, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1055–1073, 2019, doi: 10.17478/jegys.609603.
ISNAD Kahveci, Gül - Altun, Hasan. “The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students With ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7/4 (December 2019), 1055-1073. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.609603.
JAMA Kahveci G, Altun H. The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving. JEGYS. 2019;7:1055–1073.
MLA Kahveci, Gül and Hasan Altun. “The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students With ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 7, no. 4, 2019, pp. 1055-73, doi:10.17478/jegys.609603.
Vancouver Kahveci G, Altun H. The Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Intervention on Word Problem Solving for Elementary School Students with ADHD: POVM + Schema Based Word Problem Solving. JEGYS. 2019;7(4):1055-73.
By introducing the concept of the "Gifted Young Scientist," JEGYS has initiated a new research trend at the intersection of science-field education and gifted education.