Exploration of Metacognitive Skills And Student Critical Thinking Through Discovery Learning Method and Cognitive Style

Year 2019, , 999 - 1017, 15.12.2019

Yulia Pramusinta , Punaji Setyosarı Utami Wıdıatı Dedi Kuswandı

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.614028

Cited By: 7

Abstract

This research examines the effect of discovery learning method using various
cognitive
styles on metacognitive and critical thinking skills of pre-service
elementary school teachers. Quasi-experimental pretest-post tests non-equivalent control
group design is selected to be the method of this research. The subjects of
this research are 144 pre-service teachers. The instrument used to measure the
subjects’ metacognitive skill is Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI)
questionnaires as adapted from Schraw & Dennison (1994), whereas modified
essays of Ennis (1985) are to evaluate critical thinking skills. Embedded
Figure Test Group (GEFT) as adapted from Witkin, et al (1977), is utilized to
measure the cognitive styles of the research subjects. The data is then
analyzed through two-way MANOVA technique. The findings of the research
conclude that: (1) there are significant differences in metacognitive and
critical thinking skills between groups which learned using discovery learning
method and discussion method; (2) there are significant differences in
metacognitive and critical thinking skills between pre-service elementary
school teachers when integrated with field independence cognitive style and
field dependence cognitive style; (3) there is an interaction between discovery
learning and discussion method integrated with cognitive styles on
metacognitive and critical thinking skills of pre-service elementary
school teachers.   

Keywords

Metacognitive Skills, Critical Thinking, Discovery Learning Method, Cognitive Style

References

• Ahmad A., Muris M., & Tompo, B. (2016). The development of discovery-inquiry learning model to reduce the science misconceptions of junior high school students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 2016, 11(12), 5676-5686.
• Akyuz, H. I. (2015). Effects of metacognitive guidance on critical thinking disposition. Journal Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5(2), 2015, 133-148.
• Al Busaidi, S., & Sultana, T. (2014). Critical thinking through translated literature in the EFL Omani class. International Journal of English and Literature, 6(1), 16-22
• Al-Salameh, E. M. (2011). A study of Al-Balqa' applied university students cognitive style. International Education Studies, 4(3), 189-193.
• Argaw, A.S., Haile, B.B., Ayalew, B.T., & Kuma S.G. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem solving skills of physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 13(3), 857-871
• Batdal, K. G., & Erbaş, A.A. (2017). Investigation of primary school teacher candidates' metacognitive awareness level. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(4), 31-48. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2017.68
• Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
• Butterworth, J. & Thwaittes, G. (2013). Thinking Skills Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Chich-Jen, S. (2016). A study on information technology integrated guided discovery instruction towards students’ learning achievement and learning retention. Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 2016, 12(4), 833-842
• Cubukcu, F. (2009). Learner autonomy, self-regulation and metacognition. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1).
• Djamahar, R., Ristanto, R. H., Sartono, N., Ichsan, I. Z., & Muhlisin, A. (2018). Cirsa: designing instructional kits to empower 21st century skill. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(3), 200-208. DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2018.73.4.
• Ennis, R. H. (1985) Goals for Critical Thinking Curriculum in A.L. Costa, Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking. Alexandria: Association for Supervisor and Curriculum Development (ASCD)
• Fauziah, D. Y., Corebima A.D., & Zubaidah, S. (2013). Hubungan keterampilan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar biologi dan retensi siswa kelas x dengan penerapan strategi pembelajaran think pair share di SMAN 6 Malang. Jurnal Online Universitas Negeri Malang, 1-9. Retrieved from http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id.
• Fitzpatrick, B. & Schulz, H. (2015). Do curriculum outcomes and assessment activities in science encourage higher order thinking? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(2), 136-154.
• Gotoh, Y. (2016). Development of critical thinking with metacognitive regulation. 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, 48-59
• Huang, H. (2016). Mathematical teaching strategies: Pathways to critical thinking and metacognition. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, (2), 35-46
• Irmayani, S., Nyeneng, I.D.P., & Viyanti. (2014). Pengaruh keterampilan metakognisi terhadap minat dan hasil belajar melalui metode pembelajaran discovery. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika 2014, 2(3).
• Jena, P. C. (2014). Cognitive styles and problem solving ability of undergraduate student. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(2), 71-76.
• Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1996). Models of Teaching. Mars: Allyn & Bacon.
• Karakoc, M. (2016). The significance of critical thinking ability in terms of education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Institute of Social Turkey, (3), 335-245.
• Kumar, J.R.R. (2015). Evaluation of critical thinking in higher education in Oman. International Journal of Higher Education 2015, 4(3).
• Lestari, P., Ristanto, R.H., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Analysis of conceptual understanding of botany and metacognitive skill in pre-service biology teacher in Indonesia. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 199-214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.515978
• Lusweti S. L. (2017). Analysis of student-teacher cognitive styles interaction: An approach to understanding learner performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14). www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
• Martaida, T. (2017). The effect of discovery learning model on student’s critical thinking and cognitive ability in junior high school. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(6)
• Sani, R.A, (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Saxena, S., & Jain, R. K. (2014). Impact of cognitive style on problem-solving ability among undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Psychology, 1(1), 6-10.
• Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(12), 111–139. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
• Simuth Jr, J. (2015). The preferences of cognitive style among university students from various study fields. Journal Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015, 191, 2537 – 2540.
• Solberg, B.L. (2015). Critical thinking as predictor of certification exam performance in medical laboratory science. Clinical Laboratory Science, 28(2), 76-82.
• Su, H.F., Ricci, F.A., & Mnatsakinan, M. (2016). Mathematical teaching strategies: pathways to critical thinking and metacognition. Journal of Research in education and Science, 2 (1), 190-200.
• Suphi, N. (2016). Effects of discovery learning and student assessment on academic success. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 386-400.
• Tuckman, B.W. (1999). Conditioning Educational Research 5th .edition. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company.
• Tuzlukova, V. (2017). Critical thinking in the language classroom: teacher beliefs and methods. Journal Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 25 (2): 615 – 634
• Ucar, F.M. (2018). Investigation of gifted students' epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy beliefs and use of metacognition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(3), 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.77
• Vendiagrys, L., Junaedi, I., & Masrukan. (2015). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika soal setipe TIMSS berdasarkan gaya kognitif siswa pada pembelajaran model problem based learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(1).
• Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox. P. W. 1977. Field dependent and field-dependent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
• Wongsila, S. & Yuenyong, C.(2019). Enhancing grade 12 students’ critical thinking and problem-solving ability in learning of the STS genetics and DNA technology unit. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 215-235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.549005
• Yuliani, K. (2015). The development of learning devices based guided discovery model to improve understanding concept and critical thinking mathematically ability of students at Islamic junior high school of Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24).
• Yulianto,T., Pramudya,I. & Slamet,I. (2019). Effects of the 21st century learning model and problem-based models on higher order thinking skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 749-755.