Comparison of gifted and non-gifted students’ executive functions and high capabilities

Abstract

In recent years, the analysis of the relationship between cognitive skills and student learning has focused mainly on research into the impact of executive functions on academic performance and success. This study seeks to compare the cognitive performance of gifted or high-capacity students to students with a typical development in the performance of psychological tests aimed at the evaluation of executive functions. Two groups of students were considered (gifted and regular) with the intention of matching them in terms of school level and age (ages included are 10-15). The results indicate marginally significant differences in the cognitive flexibility function and statistically significant differences in working memory, as well as in the higher cognitive functions of problem solving and reasoning, with no statistically significant differences in the tests that evaluate inhibitory control and planning. These data suggest that psychological tests centred on the assessment of cognitive functions may complement the more traditional use of IQ tests for signalling and evaluating students with traits of giftedness.

Keywords

• Intelligence
• Executive Functions
• Giftedness
• Academic Performance

Thanks

A word of thanks to ANÉIS - Associação Nacional para o Estudo e Intervenção na Sobredotação (National Association for the Study and Intervention in Giftedness) for signaling the students who participated in its enrichment program for gifted students and who formed group 1. A big appreciation to Colégio Paulo VI for the facilities created in the access to the students who formed group 2.

References

1. Ackerman, D. J., & Friedman-Krauss, A. H. (2017). Preschoolers’ Executive Function: Importance, Contributors, Research Needs and Assessment Options. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1-24. doi: 10.1002/ets2.12148
2. Alnæs, D., Kaufmann, T., Doan, N. T., Córdova-Palomera, A., Wang, Y., Bettella, F., … Westlye, L. T. (2018). Association of Heritable Cognitive Ability and Psychopathology with White Matter Properties in Children and Adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(3), 287-295. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4277
3. Almeida, L. S., & Lemos, G. (2015). Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio. Braga: CERPSI.
4. Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17–42. doi:10.1007/ s11065-006-9002-x.
5. Arffa, S. (2007). The relationship of intelligence to executive function and non-executive function measures in a sample of average, above average, and gifted youth. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(8), 969-978. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.001
6. Baltaci, S. (2016). Examination Of Gifted Students’ Probability Problem Solving Process In Terms Of Mathematical Thinking. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 18-35.
7. Barbey, A. K. (2018). Network neuroscience theory of human intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.001
8. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: the common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007

9. Benson, J. E., Sabbagh, M. A., Carlson, S. M., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). Individual Differences in Executive Functioning Predict Preschoolers' Improvement from Theory-of-Mind Training. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1615-1627. doi: 10.1037/a0031056
10. Berg, D. H, & McDonald, P. A. (2018). Differences in mathematical reasoning between typically achieving and gifted children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 281-291. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2018.1457034
11. Bianco, M., & Leech, N. L. (2010). Twice-Exceptional Learners: Effects of Teacher Preparation and Disability Labels on Gifted Referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 319-334. doi: 10.1177/0888406409356392.
12. Blair, C. (2006). How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(02), 109-160. doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009034
13. Buttelmann, F., & Karbach, J. (2017). Development and plasticity of cognitive flexibility in early and middle childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1040), 1-6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01040
14. Campos, M. C., Silva, M. L., Florêncio, N. C., & Paula, J. J. (2016). Confiabilidade do Teste dos Cinco Dígitos em adultos brasileiros (Reliability of the Five Digit Test in Brazilian Adults). Jornal brasileiro de psiquiatria, 65(2), 135-139. doi: 10.1590/0047-2085000000114
15. Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. Amsterdam: North Holland.
16. Cervantes, C. J. R., Sierra, M. D. V., Borges, E. V., & Avelar, R. S. (2018). Relación entre la funciones ejecutivas y la alta capacidad intelectual en alumnos escolares (Relationship between executive functions and high intellectual capacity in school students). Revista Sobredotação, 15(2), 113-130.
17. Chevalier, N., & Blaye, A. (2016). Metacognitive Monitoring of Executive Control Engagement During Childhood. Child Development, 87(4), 1264-1276. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12537
18. Chevalier, N., Kurth, S., Doucette, M. R., Wiseheart, M., Deoni, S. C. L., Dean, D. C., … LeBourgeois, M. K. (2015). Myelination Is Associated with Processing Speed in Early Childhood: Preliminary Insights. PLOS ONE, 10(10),1-14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139897
19. Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176–1191. doi:10.1037/a0019672
20. Collins, A., & Koechlin, E. (2012) Reasoning, Learning, and Creativity: Frontal Lobe Function and Human Decision-Making. PLoS Biology 10(3), 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293
21. Corso, H. V., Sperb, T. M., de Jou, G. I., & Salles, J. F. (2013). Metacognição e funções executivas: relações entre os conceitos e implicações para a aprendizagem (Metacognition and executive functions: relationships between concepts and implications for learning). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29(1), 21-29. doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722013000100004
22. Cruz, V. (2007). O Cognitive Assessment System como instrumento de avaliação psicológica. PSIC - Revista de Psicologia da Vetor Editora, 8(1), 31-40.
23. Dai, X., Müller, H.G., Wang, J.L., & Deoni, S. C. L. (2018). Age-dynamic networks and functional correlation for early white matter myelination. Brain Structure and Function, 224(2), 535-551. doi:10.1007/s00429-018-1785-z
24. Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A. & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The P.A.S.S. theory of intelligence. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
25. De Smedt, B., Janssen, R., Bouwens, K., Verschaffell, L., Boets, B., & Ghesquiere, P. (2009). Working memory and individual differences in mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study from first grade to second grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 186–201.
26. Debatin, T., Harder, B., & Ziegler, A. (2019). Does fluid intelligence facilitate the learning of English as a foreign language? – A longitudinal latent growth curve analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 121-129. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.009
27. Demetriou, A., Kazi, S., Spanoudis, G., & Makris, N. (2019). Predicting school performance from cognitive ability, self-representation, and personality from primary school to senior high school. Intelligence, 76(101381), 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101381
28. Desco, M., Navas-Sanche, F. J., Sanchez-González, J., Reig, S., Robles, O., Franco, C., Guzmán-De-Villoria, J. A., ... Arango, C. (2011). Mathematically gifted adolescents use more extensive and more bilateral areas of the fronto-parietal network than controls during executive functioning and fluid reasoning tasks. NeuroImage, 57, 281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.063
29. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, pp. 135-168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
30. Duan, X., & Shi, J. (2011). Intelligence does not correlate with inhibitory ability at every age. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.003
31. Dunst, B., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Bergner, S., Koschutnig, K., Sommer, M., ... Neubauer A. C. (2014). Neural efficiency as a function of task demands. Intelligence, 42, 22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.005
32. Ferreira, C., & Rocha, A. M. (2006). d2: Teste de Atenção. Lisboa: Cegoc.
33. Finch, M. E. H., Neumeister, K. L. S., Burney, V. H., & Cook, A. L. (2014). The Relationship of Cognitive and Executive Functioning with Achievement in Gifted Kindergarten Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 167-182. doi: 10.1177/0016986214534889
34. Fiske, A., & Holmboe, K. (2019). Neural substrates of early executive function development. Developmental Review, 52, 42-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2019.100866.
35. Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x
36. Gagné, F. (2018). Desenvolvendo Talento Académico: MDDT – princípios de base e melhores práticas (Developing Academic Talent: MDDT - basic principles and best practices). In L. S. Almeida & A. Rocha (Eds.), Sobredotação: Uma responsabilidade coletiva (pp.197- 226). Braga: CERPSI.
37. García-Perales, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2019). Programa de enriquecimiento para alumnado con alta capacidad: Efectos positivos para el currículum (Enrichment program for students with high capacity: Positive effects for the curriculum). Comunicar, 60(XXVII), 39-48. doi: 10.3916/c60-2019-04.
38. Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23-27. doi: 10.1177/0963721412469398
39. Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. A., Princiotta, D., & Otero, T. M. (2013). Introduction: A History of Executive Functioning as a Theoretical and Clinical Construct. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of executive functioning (p. 3-12). New York: Springer Science + Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8106-5_1
40. Gotlieb, R., Hyde, E., Immordino-Yang, M. H,. & Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Cultivating the social-emotional imagination in gifted education: Insights from educational neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 1377(1), 22-31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13165.
41. Goriounova, N. A., Mansvelder, H. D. (2019). Genes, cells and brain areas of intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(44), 1-14. doi:0.3389/fnhum.2019.00044
42. Harder, B., O´Reilly, C., & Debatin, T. (2018). Intelligence, Educational and Learning Capital, and Domain Impact Level of Activities as Predictors of School Achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(4) 327–347. doi: 10.1177/0162353218799440
43. Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., & Deaño, M. (2011). Cognitive Processing and Mathematical Achievement: A Study with Schoolchildren between Fourth and Sixth Grade of Primary Education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 570–583. doi: 10.1177/0022219411400749
44. Kim, B., & K. Hays. (2005). The evolution of the intellectual partnership with a cognitive tool in inquirybased astronomy laboratory. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan, May-June.
45. Kornmann, J., Zettler, I., Kammerer, Y., Gerjets, P., & Trautwein, U. (2015). What characterizes children nominated as gifted by teachers? A closer consideration of working memory and intelligence. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 75–92. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1033513
46. Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Mathematical learning difficulties and PASS cognitive processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 574–582. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360060801
47. Krumm, G., Arán, V., & Gutierrez, M. (2018). The contribution of executive functions to creativity in children: What is the role of crystallized and fluid intelligence? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.006
48. Lafavor, T. (2017). Predictors of Academic Success in 9- to 11-Year-Old Homeless Children. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(9), 1-29. doi: 10.1177/0272431616678989
49. Lee, K. H., Choi, Y. Y., Gray, J. R., Cho, S. H., Chae, J. H., Lee, S., & Kim, K. (2006). Neural correlates of superior intelligence: Stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 29(2), 578-86. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.036
50. Lemos, G., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). Bateria de Aptidões Cognitivas (Battery of Cognitive Skills). Braga: Edição de autor.
51. Lemos, G., & Almeida, L. S. (2019). Compreender, raciocinar e resolver problemas: Novo instrumento de avaliação cognitive (Understand, reason and solve problems: New cognitive assessment tool). Análise Psicológica, 2(XXXVII): 119-133. doi: 10.14417/ap.1583
52. Lemos, G., Almeida, L. S., Guisande, M. A., & Primi, R. (2008). Inteligência e rendi- mento escolar: Análise da sua relação ao longo da escolaridade (Intelligence and school performance: Analysis of its relationship to the long-term schooling). Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 21, 83-99.
53. Léon, M. I. G. (2020). Development of Giftedness During Early Childhood. Papeles del Psicólogo/Psychologist Papers, 41(2), 147-158.
54. Liu, Q., Zhu, X., Ziegler, A. & Shi, J. (2015). The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/srep14200
55. Lunt, L., Bramham, J., Morris, R. G., Bullock, P. R., Selway, R. P., Xenitidis, K., & David, A. S. (2011). Prefrontal cortex dysfunction and “Jumping to Conclusions”: Bias or deficit? Journal of Neuropsychology, 6(1), 65-78. doi:10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02005.x
56. Lyons, K. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Monitoring, Metacognition, and Executive Function: Elucidating the Role of Self-Reflection in the Development of Self-Regulation. In J. Benson (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 379-412). Burlington: Academic Press.
57. Mann, T. D., Hund, A. M., Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Roman, Z. J. (2017). Pathways to school readiness: Executive functioning predicts academic and social-emotional aspects of school readiness. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(1), 21-31. doi:10.1111/mbe.12134
58. Marcovitch, S., Jacques, S., Boseovski, J. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Self-Reflection and the Cognitive Control of Behavior: Implications for Learning. Mind, Brain & Education, 2(3), 136-141. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00044.x
59. McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Duncan, R., Bowles, R. P., Acock, A. C., Miao, A., & Pratt, M. E. (2014). Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: the head-toes-knees-shoulders task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(599), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599
60. Miller, E. K., & Wallis, J. D. (2009). Executive Function and Higher-Order Cognition: Definition and Neural Substrates. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 4, 99-104. doi:10.1016/b978-008045046-9.00418-6
61. Monette, S., Bigras, M., & Guay, M.-C. (2011). The role of the executive functions in school achievement at the end of Grade 1. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(2), 158-173. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.008
62. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., … Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698.doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108
63. Mós, A. S. C. (2016). Propriedades Psicométricas da Figura Complexa de Rey numa Amostra de Adultos da População Portuguesa (Dissertação de mestrado) (Psychometric Properties of the Rey Complex Figure in a Sample of Adults from the Portuguese Population (Master's Dissertation). Retrieved from ISMT Repository). Retirado do Repositório ISMT. (http://repositorio.ismt.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/604)
64. Munõz, M. M. P., & Filippetti, V. A. (2019). Children's Conceptions of Intelligence. What is the role of Executive Functions and Self-regulation? Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(2), 269-303. doi: 10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.281
65. Naglieri, J. A. & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Administration and Scoring Manual. Itasca, Illinois: Riverside Publishing.
66. Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2005). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) theory: A revision of the concept of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed., pp. 136–182). New York, NY: Guilford.
67. Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). Mathematics instruction and PASS cognitive processes: An intervention study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513– 520
68. Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591–597.
69. Oliveira, A. P. A., & Nascimento, E. (2014). Construção de uma Escala para Avaliação do Planejamento Cognitivo (Construction of a Cognitive Planning Assessment Scale). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(2), 209-218. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201427201.
70. Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the Role of Gifted Education and Talent Development for the 21st Century: A Four-Part Theoretical Approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159. doi. 10.1177/0016986212444901
71. Rocha, A. M., & Coelho, M. H. (1998). Teste de Cópia de Figura Complexa de Rey. Lisboa: Cegoc.
72. Rodríguez, C., Jiménez, J. E., Díaz, A., García, E., Martín, R., & Hernández, S. (2012). Datos normativos para el Test de los Cinco Dígitos: desarrollo evolutivo de la flexibilidad en Educación Primaria (Normative data for the Five Digits Test: evolutionary development of flexibility in Primary Education). European Journal of Education and Psychology, 5(1), 27-38. doi: 10.1989/ejep.v5i1.88
73. Rodríguez-Naveiras, E., Verche, E., Hernández-Lastiri, P., Montero, R., & Borges, A., (2019). Differences in working memory between gifted or talented students and community samples: A meta-analysis. Psicothema, 31(3), 255-262. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.18
74. Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002
75. Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118-137. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
76. Sak, U. (2020). Giftedness in Adolescence. The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1, 1-11. doi: 10.1002/9781119171492.wecad380
77. Sastre-Ribas, S., & Viana-Sáenz, L. (2016). Funciones ejecutivas y alta capacidade intellectual (Executive functions and high intellectual capacity). Neurodesarrollo, 6(1), 565-571.
78. Schnack, H. G., Haren, N. E. M., Brouwer, R. M., Evans, A., Durston, S., Boomsma, D. I., ... Pol, H. (2015) Changes in thickness and surface area of the human cortex and their relationship with intelligence. Cerebral Cortex, 25(6), 1608-1617. doi.: 10.1093/cercor/bht357
79. Sedó, M. (2007). FDT: Test de Los Cinco Digitos (FDT: Five Digits Test). Manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
80. Shi, J., Tao, T., Chen, W., Cheng, L., Wang, L., & Zhang, X. (2013). Sustained attention in intellectually gifted children assessed using a continuous performance test. PloS One, 8(2), 1-8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057417.
81. Simões, M., Rocha, A. M., & Ferreira, C. (2003). WISC-III: Escala de Inteligência de Weschler para Crianças – 3ª Edição (WISC-III: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Crianças - 3rd Edition). Lisboa: Cegoc.
82. Smedsrud, J. (2020). Explaining the Variations of Definitions in Gifted Education. Nordic Studies in Education, 40(1), 79-97.
83. Soares, D. L., Lemos, G. C., Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). The relationship between intelligence and academic achievement throughout middle school: The role of students' prior academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.005
84. Solé‐Casals, J., Serra-Grabulosa, J. M., Romero-Garcia, R., Vilaseca, G., Adan, A., Vilaró, N., ... Bullmore, E. T. (2019). Structural brain network of gifted children has a more integrated and versatile topology. Brain Structure and Function, 224, 2373–2383. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01914-9.
85. Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004
86. Vaivre-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of high-level potentialities (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics, 420297, 1687-9740. doi: 10.1155/2011/420297.
87. Vanbinst, K., Ghesquière, P., & De Smedt, B. (2014). Arithmetic strategy development and its domain-specific and domain-general cognitive correlates: a longitudinal study in children with persistent mathematical learning difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 3001-3013. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.023
88. Visu-Petra, L., Cheie, L., Benga, O., & Miclea, M. (2011). Cognitive control goes to school: The impact of executive functions on academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 240-244. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.069
89. Viterbori, P., Usai, M. C., Traverso, L., & De Franchis, V. (2015). How preschool executive functioning predicts several aspects of math achievement in Grades 1 and 3: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, 38-55. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.014
90. Yang, Y., Shields, G. S., Guo, C., & Liu, Y. (2018). Executive function performance in obesity and overweight individuals: A meta-analysis and review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 84, 225–244.doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.020
91. Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive Function: Implications for Education (NCER 2017-2000). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
92. Ziegler, A., Debatin, T., & Stoeger, H. (2019). Learning resources and talent development from a systemic point of view. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1445, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14018
93. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909