Talented Students' Satisfaction with the Performance of the Gifted Centers

Year 2016, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 20, 06.12.2015

Suhail Mamoud Al–zoubi , Majdoleen Sultan Bani Abdel Rahman

Abstract

This study aimed to identify talented students' levels of satisfaction with the performance of the gifted centers. The sample of the study consisted of (142) gifted and talented students enrolled in the Najran Centers for Gifted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire was developed and distributed to the sample of the study. The results revealed that talented students were highly satisfied with the administration and teachers, whereas they were only moderately satisfied with enrichment activities, teaching methods, student relationships and facilities and equipment. Moreover, results also showed that there were no significant differences could be attributed to gender or to the level of schooling.

Keywords

gifted centers, performance, satisfaction, talented students

References

• Aayasrh, M. (2010). Problems of talented students at King Abdullah II of Excellence School. Irbid Journal of Research and Studies, 13(2), 127-162.
• Abu Hawash, R. (2012). Problems faced by gifted and talented students at Al-Baha from their perspective. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-16.
• Abu-Jaber, A. (2011). Educational programs for gifted students. Teacher Mission Journal, 49(4), 23-27.
• Abuzaitoun, J., & Banat, S. (2010).The relationship between psychological adjustment and problem solving among gifted and talented students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 11(2), 40-64.
• Adelson, J., McCoach, D & Gavin, M. (2012). Examining the effects of gifted programming in mathematics and reading using the ECLS-K. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(1), 25-39.
• Ahmadi, M. (2005). Problems of talented students in Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference for gifted and talented, Amman, Jordan.
• Ahmadi, M. (2006). Problems and counseling needs of gifted and talented students. Paper presented at the Regional Scientific Conference of Giftedness, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
• Al Garni, A. (2012). Attitudes of future special education teachers toward gifted students and their education (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
• Al Shihab, I. (2012). Problems affecting gifted children in Jordanian schools. American Journal of Health Sciences, 3(4), 301-310.
• Al-Ajez, F., & Murtaja, Z. (2012). The reality of gifted and talented students in Gaza governorate. Journal of the Islamic University for Educational and Psychological Studies, 20(1), 33-367.
• Alamer, S., (2010). Views of giftedness: the perceptions of teachers and parents regarding the traits of gifted children in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Australia.
• Alamer, S. (2014). Challenges facing gifted students in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(24), 107-112.
• Al-Balawi, S. (2005). The effect of EFL enrichment programs on Pioneer Centers (Unpublished Master's thesis). Yarmouk University, Jordan.
• Al-Ghamdi, H. (2006). Obstacles faced by talented students in the Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the Regional Scientific Conference of Giftedness, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
• Al-Hadabi, A. (2010). Yemeni basic education teachers’ perception of gifted students'’ characteristics and the methods used for identifying these characteristics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 480-487.
• Aljghaiman, A., & Maajeny, U. (2013). Evaluation of the gifted program in general education schools according to quality standards of enrichment programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 14(1), 217-245.
• Aljughaiman, A, & Ayoub, A. (2012). The effects of a school enrichment program on the analytical, creative, and practical abilities of elementary gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(2), 153-174.
• Al-Kassy, A. (2004).The reality of education talented students at gifted centers (Master's thesis). Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.
• Al-Kharabsheh, O., & Arabyyat, A. (2010). Problems of gifted and talented students at Jordanian Pioneer Centers. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 22(3), 225-249.
• Al-Khateeb, I. (2003). Evaluation EFL in Pioneer Centers from the students and teachers perspectives (Unpublished Master's thesis). Yarmouk University, Jordan.
• Al–Qamash, M. (2013). Degree of practice of gifted teachers to the dimensions of effective teaching in Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 40, 445-462.
• Al-Shahrani, F. (2002). The contributions of the school administration in the identification of gifted students (Unpublished Master's thesis). Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.
• Al-Shehri, M., Al-Zoubi, S., & Bani Abdel Rahman, M. (2011). The effectiveness of gifted students centers in developing geometric thinking. Educational Research, 2(11), 1676-1684.
• Al-Zoubi, S. (2014). Effects of enrichment programs on the academic achievement of gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 2(2), 22-27.
• Al-Zoubi, S. (2011). Problems faced by talented students at pioneer centers in Jordan. College of Education Journal, 145, 311-334.
• Al-Zoubi, S., & Bani Abdel Rahman, M. (2011).The Effectiveness of gifted center as perceived by gifted students. Arab Journal for Talent Development, 2(2), 61-82.
• Ashwal, A. (2013). Problems of gifted and talented students. Arab Journal for Talent Development, 4(6), 109-136.
• Awamleh, H., & Blawi, A. (2008). The level of educational competencies among gifted teachers in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education at Assiut University, 24(1), 267-296.
• Azam, D. (2002). The effectiveness of the administration of King Abdullah II for Excellence schools from the perspective of the staff (Unpublished Master's thesis). Yarmouk University, Jordan.
• Bain, S., Choate, S., & Bliss, S. (2006). Perceptions of developmental, social, and emotional issues in giftedness: Are they realistic? Roeper Review, 29(1), 41-48.
• Bakhit, S., & Hassan, Z. (2011). Burnout among teachers of gifted students in the Sudan. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 3(1), 12-68.
• Bangel, N., Enersen, D., Capobianco, B., & Moon, S. (2006). Professional development of preservice teachers: Teaching in the Super Saturday program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(3), 339–361
• Bani Abdel Rahman, M., & Al-Zoubi, S., (2014).The problems faced by teachers of Pioneer Centers in Jordan. Arab Journal for Talent Development, 5(9), 165-186.
• Berger, S. (2006). College planning for gifted students: Choosing and getting into the right college. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
• Brulles, D., Saunders, R., & Cohn, S. (2010). Improving performance for gifted students in a cluster-grouping model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(2), 327–350.
• Budair, N., & Bahabri, M. (2010). The experience of Saudi Arabia in the talented and gifted education. Paper presented at the first Gulf Forum for the Gifted, Oman.
• Chan, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence, social coping, and psychological distress among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 16(2), 163-178.
• Chessor, D., & Whitton, D. (2005). The impact of grouping gifted primary school students on self-concept, motivation and achievement from parents' perspectives. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1), 93-104
• Chessor, D., & Whitton, D. (2007). The impact of grouping gifted primary school students on self-concept and achievement. TalentEd, 25(2), 7-22.
• Cho, S., & Lee, M. (2006). Effects of the enrichment program for the economically disadvantaged gifted and their aspirations and satisfaction with the program. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 3(2), 81-97.
• Cross, T., & Swiatek, M. (2009). Social coping among academically gifted adolescents in a residential setting: A longitudinal study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 25-33.
• Davis, G., Rimm, S., & Siegel, D. (2010). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Delcourt, M., Cornell, D., & Goldberg, M. (2007). Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 359-381.
• Gaith, S., Banat, S., & Tagash, H. (2009). Psychological stress among gifted and talented students at pioneering centers. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 10(1), 246-268.
• Gavin, M., Casa, T., Adelson, J., Carroll, S., & Sheffield, L. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 188-202.
• Gentry, M., & MacDougall, J. (2008). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center: Creative Learning Press.
• Hertzog, N. (2003). Impact of gifted programs from the students’ perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 131–143.
• Jarwan, F. (2013, a). Giftedness and talent. Amman, Jordan: Daralfiker.
• Jarwan, F. (2013, b). Assessment of admission of gifted students, enrichment curricula and selection of teachers at Jordanian Excellence Schools according to international standards for gifted education. Ain Shams University Journal for Education & Psychology, 3(35), 493-515.
• Jarwan, F., & Maharmah, L. (2009). Assessment of King Abdullah II of Excellence Schools programs according to international standards of gifted education. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference for gifted and talented, Amman, Jordan.
• Jin, S., & Moon, K. (2006). A Study of well-Being and school satisfaction among academically talented students attending a science high school in Korea. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 169-184.
• Johnson, S. (2013). National challenges in providing services to gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 5-6.
• Juhani, F. (2008). The roles of gifted teachers in the planning and evaluation of enrichment curriculum in the gifted program (Unpublished Master's thesis). Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.
• Kaminsky, H. (2007). The effects of an enrichment program on the academic self-perceptions of male and female culturally diverse minority gifted learning-disabled students (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Fairleigh Dickinson University. New Jersey.
• Kesner, J. (2005). Gifted children’s relationships with teachers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 218-223.
• Khawaldah, H. (2006). Assessment of gifted curriculum from the perspective of teachers and students (Unpublished Master's thesis). Amman Arab University, Jordan.King Faisal University (2015). The National Research Center for Giftedness and Creativity. Retrieved from http://www.kfu.edu.sa.
• Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32– 42.
• Maharmah , L., &, Mahmoud, A. (2012).The competences of King Abdullah II Schools for Excellence teacher in the light of international standards of gifted education, International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education,1(8), 418-432.
• Maharmah , L., &, Mahmoud, A. (2013). The competences of gifted teachers at Pioneer Centers and Giftedness Resource Rooms in light of Council of Exceptional Children standards. Paper presented at the Tenth Conference for gifted and talented, Amman, Jordan.
• Matthews, D., & Foster, J. (2006). Mystery to mastery: Shifting paradigms in gifted education. Roeper Review, 28(2), 64-69.
• Miller, R., & Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 594–627.
• Ministry of Education. (2015). Educating gifted and talented students at the Kingdome of Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from http:// www.moe.gov.sa.
• Momani, S. (2006). Evaluation of gifted students programs in Jordan (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Jordan, Jordan.
• Montashari, A. (2007). Quality requirements at gifted programs in the Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the conference of the quality in public education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
• Morgan, A. (2007). Experiences of gifted and talented enrichment cluster for pupils aged five to seven. British Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 144-153.
• National Association for Gifted Children .(2015). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for gifted and talented students. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org.
• National Association for Gifted Children and the National Council of Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (2009). 2008-2009 state of the states in gifted education. Washington, DC: Author.
• Needham, V. (2012). Primary teachers’ perceptions of the social and emotional aspects of gifted and talented education. APEX. The New Zealand Journal of Gifted Education, 17(1), 1-18.
• Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock.
• Nugent, S. (2005). Affective education: Addressing the social and emotional needs of gifted students in the classroom. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed.) (pp. 409–438). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Oakland, T., & Rossen, E. (2005). A 21st –Century model for identifying students for gifted and talented programs in light of national condition. Gifted Child Today, 28, 56-63.
• O'Donovan, E. (2007). Is your gifted and talented program giving you headaches? District Administration, 43(11), 70.
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 219–228). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Laubscher, L. (1996). The impact of a college counseling program on economically disadvantaged gifted students and their subsequent college adjustment. Roeper Review, 18(3), 202-208.
• Owoeye, J., & Yara, P. (2011). School facilities and academic achievement of secondary school agricultural science in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Asian Social Science, 7(7), 64-74.
• Peterson, J. (2008). The essential guide for talking with gifted teens: Ready to use discussions about identity, stress, relationships, and more. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.
• Quraiti, A. (2005). Gifted and talented. Cairo: Dar Elfikre Alarabi.
• Reis, S. (2007). No child left bored. School Administrator, 64(2), 22-26.
• Rhoades, B., Warren, H., Domitrovich, C., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Examining the link between preschool social–emotional competence and first grade academic achievement: The role of attention skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 182-191.
• Rogers, K. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396.
• Rogers, K. (2002). Grouping the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 21(4), 103-107.
• Sastre-Riba, S. (2013). High intellectual ability: Extracurricular enrichment and cognitive management. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(1), 119-132.
• Sauce, F. (2010). Teachers` strategies in dealing with academically talented students from the perspective of teachers and principals (Unpublished Master's thesis). An-Najah National University, Palestine.
• Shields, C. (2002). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classroom. Roeper Review, 24(3), 115-119.
• Shurman, M. (2003). The performance of Pioneer Centers in Jordan from the perspective of administrators, teachers and students (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Yarmouk University, Jordan.
• Srour, N. (2010). Introduction to gifted and talented education. Amman: Daralfiker.
• Synder, K., Nietfeld, J., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Giftedness and metacognition: A short term longitudinal investigation of metacognitive monitoring in the classroom. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 181-193.
• Szymanski, T., & Shaff, T. (2013). Teacher perspectives regarding gifted diverse students. Gifted Children, 6(1). Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.
• Tawalbeh, A, & Mahadeen, O. (2013). The psychological status of talented students before and after enrollment of Gifted School. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 40(1), 107-119.
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2008). What works in curriculum for the gifted? Paper presented at the Tenth Asia Pacific Conference on the Gifted, Singapore.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2004). Working with gifted students with special needs: A curriculum and program challenge. Gifted Education Communicator, 35(2), 4-7.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted Learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 211–217.
• Vialle, W., Heaven, P., & Ciarrochi J. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 569-586.
• Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.
• Woolfolk, A. (2005). Educational Psychology. Boston: Lyn, Bacon.
• Wynn, J. (2010). Attributes of effective elementary principals who lead successful gifted programs: A case study (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Mercer University, Macon.
• Youssef, H. (2010). Analytical vision for methods and scales used for identifying gifted and talented in the Libyan. Culture and Development, 11(38), 154 –195.