The Architectural Project Experience Process for the Education Center of Gifted and Talented Children

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 26 - 48, 01.08.2017

A. Deniz Oktaç Beycan

Abstract

The instruction model for the children with different intelligence and talents should also be different. Therefore, after identifying the personal development line and the quality, the instruction model should be changed according to the development line executed by the children. Within the framework of these opinions, "gifted and talented children's educational center architectural project" was studied as 6th term Project at Selçuk University Faculty of Architecture Department of Architecture, ADOBE / Toprak Architectural Design Studio in 2015-2016 Spring Semester. The education center was formed as open, semi-open and closed spaces involving educational units, socio-cultural spaces, accommodation units, managerial and service units and the recreation arrangements for educational and relaxation purposes. Considering children as the basic users of the center, the project was provided to have sustainable ecologic and human-friendly spaces within the scope of today’s trends. The projects designed at the end of the education period are the products of architectural studio experience having the quality of being a student term project. This study has the purpose of being a clear invitation to the scientific collaborative studies that can be performed on this subject and sharing this architectural experience period with the science world.

Keywords

gifted and talented children, education center, architecture, gifted and talented children's training center building, children

References

• Al Zoubi, Suhail Mamoud and Abdel Rahman Majdoleen Sultan Bani. (2015). Talented Students Saticfaction with the Performance of the Gifted Centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scienctists, 4(1), 1-20.
• Ataman, A. (2012). “Üstün Yetenekli Çocuk Kimdir”, Geleceğin Mimarları Üstün Yetenekliler Sempozyumu 27 Nisan 2012. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu. 4-15. Tekirdağ.
• Ciravoğlu A. (2001). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Workshop-Stüdyo Paralelliği Üzerine, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
• Demirel, Ö. (2005) Öğretme Sanatı. Ankara.
• Fischer, C, Müller, K. (2014) “Gifted Education and Talent Support in Germany”, c e p s Journal. 4(3), 31-54. (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1129537.pdf)
• Gourley, T. J.; And Others. (1975) Programs for Gifted Students: A National Survey,Educational Improvement Center, Pitman, NJ.. (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED129000.pdf)
• Hollingsworth, P. (1996). The Center for Arts and Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Final Performance Report for Javits Grant. Office of Educational Research and Improvement(ED).Washington,DC.1-11.(http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED417520.pdf)
• İnceoğlu, N. (1994) Tasarım Stüdyolarının Dünü-Bugünü, Mimari Proje Dersinin Sorgulanması Semineri, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. 18-24. İstanbul.
• Koester, R.J. (2006), Centers for Regenerative Studies: Graduate Studio Experiences in Education for Sustainable Design, Proceedings of PLEA2006. 1:659-664. Switzerland.
• Korkmaz, (2014), “Üstün Zekalılar Eğitiminde En İyi Uygulamalar Kanıt Temelli Bir Klavuz”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scienctists, 2(2) November-2014, p.94-97.
• Kurnaz, A. (2012).“Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklarda Değer Eğitimi”, Geleceğin Mimarları Üstün Yetenekliler Sempozyumu 27 Nisan 2012, Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, s. 49-71. Tekirdağ.
• Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004), Differentiated instruction: Inclusives trategies for standards based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education. (http://differentiation.dbbcso.org/uploads/7/9/6/7/7967947/differentiating_instruction_-_lawrence_brown.pdf)
• Levent, F. (2012) Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Rehberlik İhtiyacına Yönelik Eğitim Politikaları, Geleceğin Mimarları Üstün Yetenekliler Sempozyumu 27 Nisan 2012. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, 35-40. Tekirdağ.
• Marland, S.P. (1972). Education of the Giftedand Talented. Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• MEB (2009) Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Üstün Zeka ve Özel Yetenekli Çocuklar. MEGEP (Mesleki Eğitim e Öğretim Sisteminin Güçlendirilmesi Projesi). Ankara.
• Şahin, A. (2013). Mimarlık Eğitiminde Bir Stüdyo Yöntemi: Tasarla-Yap Stüdyosu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Santeusanio, N. (1974). Talent Will Out! What Are We Doing "to" the Gifted. Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association 19th, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 1-4, 1-11. (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED094328.pdf)
• Tirri K., Pehkonen L. (2002). “The Moral Reasoning and Scientific Argumentation of Gifted Adolescents”. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, Spring 2002, 120, 129. (http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED449586.pdf)
• Yılmaz, E.M. ve Ulusoy, M. (2016) “Mimarlık Eğitimi Sürecinde Stüdyo İzlenimleri”. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Derğisi, 5, Özel Sayı, 327-337.
• Web1. http://www.necatebaykoc.com.tr/data/dokumanlar/ustun_ve_ozel_yetenekliler.pdf(31.03.2017)
• Web2. http://www.megep.meb.gov.tr/mte_program_modul/moduller_pdf/%C3%9Cst%C3%BCn%20Zek%C3%A2%20ve%20%C3%96zel%20Yetenekliler.pdf (31.03.2017)
• Web 3. http://www.nevzattarhan.com/ozel-yetenekli-cocuklarin-egitimi-nasil-olmali.html (31.03.2017)
• Web 4 https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/myths-about-gifted-students (31.03.2017)
• Web 5 http://www.talentcentrebudapest.eu/content/global-center-gifted-and-talented-children (31.03.2017)
• Web 6 http://www.asms.net/residential-life/campus-amenities/ (31.03.2017)
• Web 7 http://www.asms.net/residential-life/off-campus/(31.03.2017)
• Web 8 http://www.asms.net/students/clubs/(31.03.2017)
• Web 9 https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/gifted-state/statewide-public-high-schools-advanced-students (31.03.2017)