Reading, Mind Mapping, and Sharing(RMS): Innovation of New Learning Model on Science Lecture to Improve Understanding Concepts

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 323 - 340, 27.06.2019

Ahmad Muhlisin

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.570501

Cited By: 10

Abstract

The course of science is considered to boring
and difficult course to be understood by
students of science education program. The
aims of this research are examine the effect of  RMS learning model in mastering the students
concepts; 2) examine the effect of difference academic ability in mastering
students concept; 3) examine the effect of interaction between RMS learning
model and different academic abilities on mastering students concepts. The
method of this research is using quasi experimental
design method with pretest and postest of non equivalent group design with factorial 2x2. The instrument of this study was essay test with high
level of reliability 0.712. The Essay Test was developed
based on Bloom’s taxonomy i.e. remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate,
and create. The data analysis used ANCOVA. The result
showed that the average score for posttest in RMS learning model with high and
low academic level are higher than posttest in conventional class with high and
low academic level.  The result of
mastery of students concepts are higher, 16.233 compared to conventional
learning models

Keywords

RMS Learning Model, Understanding Concepts, Basic Concepts of Science

References

• Ajaja, O., & Eravwoke, O. (2010). Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy on Junior Secondary School Students Achievement in Integrated Science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14 (1): 1-18.
• Bahri. A., Azis, A., & Amin, N. (2012). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Question Student Have dan academic skills on the cognitive learning results of the class VIII junior high school Camba (the implementation of Learning Strategies Have Question Student and Academic ability Against Cognitive Learning Outcomes Grade SMPN 2 Camba). Journal Sainmat, 1 (1): 41-51.
• Fraser, B.J. and Walberg, H.J. (1995). Improving Science Education. Chicago: The National Society for Study of Education.
• Fu, Y., Chen, S., Wey, S., & Chen, S. (2014). The Effects of Reading Strategy Instruction via Electronic Storybooks on EFL Young Readers’ Reading Performance. International Journal of Contemporary Education Research, 1 (1): 9-20.
• Gan, S & Hong, K. (2010). The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in the Teaching of Mathematics. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7 (2010): 113-132.
• Hadi, A., Corebima, A., & Saptasari, M. (2013). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Malang (the effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model on the Critical Thinking Ability and understand Biology for Senior High School in Malang). Journal Online UM , 1-11. (Online), (karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id ), accessed on December 29, 2014. Imaduddin, M., & Utomo, U. (2012). Efektifitas Metode Mapping untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Fisika pada Siswa Kelas VIII (the effect of mind mapping on increasing Physics Learning Achievement in Class 8. Humanitas, 9 (1): 62-75.
• Ismawati, F., Nugroho, S., & Dwijananti, P. (2014). Application of Conceptual Understanding Procedures for Improving Student Curiosity and Understanding Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10 (2014): 22-27.
• Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun, E. (2011). Model of Teaching Model-Model Pengajaran. Edisi Kedelapan (Model of Teaching Models of Teaching. Eighth Edition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
• Kirmizi, O. (2015). The Influence of Learner Readiness on Student Satisfaction and Academic Achievement in an Online Program at Higher Education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14 (1): 133-142.
• Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T., & Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the Effects of Representational Tools in Collaborative and Individual Inquiry Learning. Computer Supported Collaborative learning, 6 (1): 223-251.
• Komalasari, K. (2011). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
• Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (4): 212-218.
• Lee, P & Pang, V. (2015). Motivational Factors in Continuing Education an Academic Achievement of Adult Learners. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 10 (2015): 55-77.
• Long, D & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the Map: How Thinking Maps Affect Student Achievement. Networks, 13 (2): 1-7.Marzano, R.J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classrooms: Teaching with Dimension of Learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Mauke, M. (2013). Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and learning terhadap Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran IPA Fisika di MTs Negeri Negara. E-Journal Program pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA. 3; 1-12.
• Morrison, A. (2012). Professional Standards for Lecturers in Scotland’s Colleges. Initial Teacher Training/Education Standards for Lecturers in Scotland’s Colleges. Edinburgh: The Scottish Goverment by APS Group Scotland.
• Muhlisin, A. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Berbasis Contextual Teaching And learning (CTL) dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Achievement Division (STAD) Tema Polusi Udara. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, ISSN 2252-6420, 2 (2012): 139-145.
• Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2015). Analysis of Method or Learning Model and Skill Qualification of Students’ Critical Thinking in The Natural Science Basic Concept Lecture. 8th International Conference on Science, Mathematics&Technology Education (SMTE) UNJ. Jakarta, November 21-24, 2015.
• Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2016a). Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda pada Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar IPA. Seminar Nasional Biologi FMIPA Unesa. Surabaya, 20 Februari 2016.
• Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2016b). An Analysis of University Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Retention on Science Basic Concepts. Conference Proceedings 7th International Conference on Educational Technology (ICETA7) of Adi Buana. Graduate Program University of PGRI Adi Buana. Surabaya. 13 March 2016.
• Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2016). Improving Critical Thinking Skills of College Students Through RMS Model for Learning Basic Concepts in Science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17 (1): Article 12.
• Muhlisin, A., Susilo, H., Amin, M., & Rohman, F. (2018). The Effectiveness of RMS Learning Model in Improving Metacognitive Skills on Science Basic Concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15 (4): 1-14.
• Mumpuni, K., Prayitno, B., Karyanto, P., & Sugiharto, B. (2012). Pemberdayaan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Biologi Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran INSTAD Pada Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda. Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 281-285. (Online), (jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id), diakses pada 14 Desember 2014.
• Murdani, S. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif dengan Tutor Sebaya pada Pokok Bahasan Rangkaian Seri paralel Hambatan Listrik. JRKPF UAD, 1 (2): 42-46.
• Nor, M & Mahamod, Z. (2014). Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan Guru Bahasa IBAN yang Baharu dengan yang Berpengalaman di Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah di Sarawak. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11 (2014): 2017-236.
• Oren, F. & Meric, G. (2014). Seventh Grade Students’ Perceptions of Using Concept Cartoons in Science and Technology Course. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2 (2): 116-137.
• Rohana. (2009). Penggunaan Peta Konsep dalam Pembelajaran Statistika Dasar di Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas PGRI Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2): 92-102.
• Siemens, G. (2005). Learning Development Cycle: Bridging Learning Design and Modern Knowledge Needs. (Online), (www.cedma-europe.org/), diakses pada 29 Desember 2014.
• Smarabawa, I., Arnyana, IB., Igan., & Setiawan. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Sains Teknologi Masyarakat Terhadap pemahaman Konsep Biologi dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 3 (1): 1-11.
• Sofiya, N. (2014). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar, Membaca Kritis dan Belajar terhadap Berpikir Kritis Siswa Jurusan Administrasi Perkantoran SMK Widya Praja Ungaran. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3 (3): 570-575.
• Sutami, N., Suharsono, N., & Warpala, I. (2013). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Scaffolding terhadap Keterampilan Menulis Teks Recount Berbahasa Inggris dan Kreativitas Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Manggis. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, 3 (1): 1-9.
• Tungprapa, T. (2015). Effect of Using the Electronic Mind Map in the Education Research Methodology Course for Master Degree Students in the Faculty of Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5 (11): 803-807.
• Umar, I & Ahmad, N. (2010). Trainee Teachers’ Critical Thinking in an Online Discussion Forum: A Content Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7 (2010): 75-91.
• Uzaimi, A. (2012). Ekspektasi, Motivasi, dan Kesiapan Mahasiswa untuk Belajar Studi pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji Tanjungpinang (Studi Komparatif Mahasiswa Pendatang dan Tempatan). JEMI, 3(1): 23-32.
• Wigiani, A., Ashadi., & Hastuti, B. (2012). Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran Problem Posing dan Mind Mapping terhadap Prestasi Belajar dengan Memperhatikan Kreativitas Siswa pada Materi Pokok Reaksi Redoks Kelas x Semester 2 Sma Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia,. 1 (1): 1-7.
• Zaibon, S & Shiratuddin, N. (2010). Mobile Game-Based Learning (mGBL): Application Developmen and Heuristics Evaluation Strategy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7 (2010): 37-73.