Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 449 - 458, 15.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.531412

Abstract

References

  • ALI A. Alsaaw, (I2013) To what extent guessing the meaning from the context, is helpful in teaching vocabulary. ARECLS, , Vol.10, 130-146. Andrew. P. Johnson. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing a Guide Book for Tutoring and Remediating Students. USA : Rowman Littlefield PublisherAnnisa, A., (2013) Techniques in presenting vocabulary to young EFL learners. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 11-20 International Journal of Teaching and Education Vol. III, No. 3 / 2015 31 Arnaud, P. &Bejoint, H. (1992).Vocabulary and Applied Linguistic. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Brown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principle and classroom practices. San Fransisco, California: Pearson Education.Barr, R., Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Katz, C., & Kaufman, B. (2001). Reading diagnosis for teachers: An instructional approach. White Plains, NY: Longman. (Includes useful chapter on individual assessment of vocabulary) Beck , I. , & McKeown , M. ( 2007 ). Increasing young low- income children ’ s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction . Elementary School Journal , 107 ( 3 ), 251 – 271.Biancarosa, G. and Snow, C. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. Report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Berne, J. I., &Blachowicz, C. L. Z.,(2008)What reading teachers say about vocabulary instruction: Voices from the classroom. The Reading Teacher 62 (4).314-323.Bailey, A. (ed.) (2007). The Language Demands of School: Putting Academic Language to the Test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Beck, I. L. and McKeown, Cooter, R. B. (1990). The teacher’s guide to reading tests. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch. (A concise guide to commercial and standardized assessment tools) Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coady, J., &Huckin, T. (Eds.).(1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.).(1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman. Clark, A. M., Anderson, R. C., Archodidou, A., et al. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review 15, 181–198. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los angeles, LA: Sage.Colaner , S. ( 2012 , January 16). On Digital Textbooks: Fun facts, projections, and possibilities . Retrieved from http://hothardware.com/ News/On-Digital-Textbooks-Fun-FactsProjections-and-Possibilities/ October 20, 2013.Dubin, F. (1993).Predicting word meanings from contextual clues: Evidence from L1 readers.In Huckin, T., Haynes, M., and Coady, J (Ed.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 181-202). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to ClassroomTeaching. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling. Reading Teacher 56(3), 286– 291. Moje, E. B., Dillon, D. R., and O’Brien, D. (2000). Reexamining roles of learner, text and context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research 93(3), 165–180. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach english (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pearson Education.Gairns, R. & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary.USA: Cambridge University Press.I.S.P. Nation. (2009). Teaching ESL / EFL Reading and Writing. New York : RoutledgeGrinshaw , S. , Dungworth , N. , McKnight , C. , & Morris , A. ( 2007 ). Electronic books: Children ’ s reading and comprehension . British Journal of Educational Technology , 38 ( 4 ), 583 – 589 . Johnson, D. D. (2000). Vocabulary in the elementary and middle school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Jennifer A.Moon. (2004). A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning : Theory and Practice. New York : Routledge FalmerM. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read aloud experiences for young children. Reading Teacher 55(1), 10–20. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ :Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesFraenkel.Snow, C. E. (2003). Assessment of reading comprehension: Researchers and practitioners helping themselves and each other. In Sweet, A. P. And Snow, C. (eds.) Rethinking Reading Comprehension, pp 192–206. New York: Guilford. Syafrizal. (2017). Code Mixing in Students’ Twitter Status at Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University in Banten. Volume 2, Issue 1. Serang: Untirta Press.Syafrizal. (2017). Digital Storytelling: Teaching Aid for E-Learning to Improve the Quality of Nonformal Students of Teacher Trainingand Education. 3rd NFE Conference on Lifelong Learning. Serang: Untirta Press.Neuman, Susan & Dwyer, Julie. (2009). Missing in Action: Vocabulary Instruction in Pre-K. The Reading Teacher International Reading Association. 62. 384-392. 10.1598/RT.62.5.2.P. and Snow, C. E. (eds.) (2003). Rethinking Reading Comprehension. New York: Guilford.Ozek, Y., & Civelek, M. (2006). A study on the use of cognitive reading strategies by elt students. The Asian EFL Journal, 14(1), 1-26. Retrieved from asian-efl-journal.comSiberman Mel. (2007). The Hndbook of Experiential Learning. United States of America : John Willey Son Inc.Rober. J. Marzano, Katie. Rogers., Julia A. Sims. (2015) Vocabulary for The New Science StandardsSyafrizal. (2017). Digital Storytelling: Teaching Aid for E-Learning to Improve the Quality of Nonformal Students of Teacher Trainingand Education. 3rd NFE Conference on Lifelong Learning. Serang: Untirta Press.Syafrizal, C. R. (2017). Teacher's Speaking Strategies At Vocational High School. The Journal Of English Language Studies, 66-83.Syafrizal, A. R. (2017 ). Code Mixing In Students’ Twitter Status At Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University In Banten, Indonesia . European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching , Volume 2 │ Issue 1 .Wallen, & Hyun. (2012). How to desing and evaluate research in educaton (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students' Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 449 - 458, 15.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.531412

Abstract

The
aim of the research is to know
the influenced of using experiential learning and animation video as a method
toward students’ reading comprehension and vocabulary mastery.
The researcher used quantitative experiment used survey Technic. The instrument using test validity and realibility. The respondents of
the research is all of students grade 7
th in Al Inayah Islamic
Junior High School at Cilegon city they are 86 students in Stratefied Random
Sampling.
Reading comprehension is
an intentional, active, interactive process that occurs before, during and
after a person reads a particular piece of writing. Therefore
vocabulary
mastery is not only knowing the words and its meanings, but also knowing about
how the words sound and how the words are used in the context. It is that
knowing a word by sight and sound and knowing its dictionary definition are not
the same as knowing how to use the word correctly and understanding it when it
is heard or seen in various contexts. This research combaining the method and
media toward reading comprehension and vocabulary mastery. There are
experiential learning method and animation video as media
.Based
on the results of data processing using SPSS 17.0, obtained the value of t
count for experiential learning method (X1) of 1.416 and the value of sig.
0.001. And t table is T (α / 2; n-k-1) = T (0.05 / 2; 21-2-1) = T (0.025; 19) =
0.475. Because the value of t count (0.475) is larger t table (1.416), then H0
is rejected and H1 is accepted. 
Therefore  the value of t count
for animation video (X3) of 1.078 and the value of sig. 0.000. And t table is T
(α / 2; n-k-1) = T (0.05 / 2; 21-2-1) = T (0.025; 19) = 0.475. Because the
value of t count (0.475) is larger t table (1.078) Therefore  the value of t count for vocabulary mastery
(X2) of 1.161 and the value of sig. 0.000. And t table is T (α / 2; n-k-1) = T
(0.05 / 2; 21-2-1) = T (0.025; 19) = 0.475. Because the value of t count
(0.475) is larger t table (1.161), so it can be conclude  that there is
significant influence of
experiential learning method and animation video toward  students’ 
reading comprehension and students’ vocabulary mastery.

References

  • ALI A. Alsaaw, (I2013) To what extent guessing the meaning from the context, is helpful in teaching vocabulary. ARECLS, , Vol.10, 130-146. Andrew. P. Johnson. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing a Guide Book for Tutoring and Remediating Students. USA : Rowman Littlefield PublisherAnnisa, A., (2013) Techniques in presenting vocabulary to young EFL learners. Journal of English and Education, 1(1), 11-20 International Journal of Teaching and Education Vol. III, No. 3 / 2015 31 Arnaud, P. &Bejoint, H. (1992).Vocabulary and Applied Linguistic. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Brown, D. H. (2004). Language assessment: Principle and classroom practices. San Fransisco, California: Pearson Education.Barr, R., Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Katz, C., & Kaufman, B. (2001). Reading diagnosis for teachers: An instructional approach. White Plains, NY: Longman. (Includes useful chapter on individual assessment of vocabulary) Beck , I. , & McKeown , M. ( 2007 ). Increasing young low- income children ’ s oral vocabulary repertoires through rich and focused instruction . Elementary School Journal , 107 ( 3 ), 251 – 271.Biancarosa, G. and Snow, C. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. Report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Berne, J. I., &Blachowicz, C. L. Z.,(2008)What reading teachers say about vocabulary instruction: Voices from the classroom. The Reading Teacher 62 (4).314-323.Bailey, A. (ed.) (2007). The Language Demands of School: Putting Academic Language to the Test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Beck, I. L. and McKeown, Cooter, R. B. (1990). The teacher’s guide to reading tests. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch. (A concise guide to commercial and standardized assessment tools) Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coady, J., &Huckin, T. (Eds.).(1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.).(1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman. Clark, A. M., Anderson, R. C., Archodidou, A., et al. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review 15, 181–198. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los angeles, LA: Sage.Colaner , S. ( 2012 , January 16). On Digital Textbooks: Fun facts, projections, and possibilities . Retrieved from http://hothardware.com/ News/On-Digital-Textbooks-Fun-FactsProjections-and-Possibilities/ October 20, 2013.Dubin, F. (1993).Predicting word meanings from contextual clues: Evidence from L1 readers.In Huckin, T., Haynes, M., and Coady, J (Ed.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 181-202). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to ClassroomTeaching. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling. Reading Teacher 56(3), 286– 291. Moje, E. B., Dillon, D. R., and O’Brien, D. (2000). Reexamining roles of learner, text and context in secondary literacy. Journal of Educational Research 93(3), 165–180. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach english (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pearson Education.Gairns, R. & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary.USA: Cambridge University Press.I.S.P. Nation. (2009). Teaching ESL / EFL Reading and Writing. New York : RoutledgeGrinshaw , S. , Dungworth , N. , McKnight , C. , & Morris , A. ( 2007 ). Electronic books: Children ’ s reading and comprehension . British Journal of Educational Technology , 38 ( 4 ), 583 – 589 . Johnson, D. D. (2000). Vocabulary in the elementary and middle school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Jennifer A.Moon. (2004). A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning : Theory and Practice. New York : Routledge FalmerM. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read aloud experiences for young children. Reading Teacher 55(1), 10–20. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ :Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesFraenkel.Snow, C. E. (2003). Assessment of reading comprehension: Researchers and practitioners helping themselves and each other. In Sweet, A. P. And Snow, C. (eds.) Rethinking Reading Comprehension, pp 192–206. New York: Guilford. Syafrizal. (2017). Code Mixing in Students’ Twitter Status at Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University in Banten. Volume 2, Issue 1. Serang: Untirta Press.Syafrizal. (2017). Digital Storytelling: Teaching Aid for E-Learning to Improve the Quality of Nonformal Students of Teacher Trainingand Education. 3rd NFE Conference on Lifelong Learning. Serang: Untirta Press.Neuman, Susan & Dwyer, Julie. (2009). Missing in Action: Vocabulary Instruction in Pre-K. The Reading Teacher International Reading Association. 62. 384-392. 10.1598/RT.62.5.2.P. and Snow, C. E. (eds.) (2003). Rethinking Reading Comprehension. New York: Guilford.Ozek, Y., & Civelek, M. (2006). A study on the use of cognitive reading strategies by elt students. The Asian EFL Journal, 14(1), 1-26. Retrieved from asian-efl-journal.comSiberman Mel. (2007). The Hndbook of Experiential Learning. United States of America : John Willey Son Inc.Rober. J. Marzano, Katie. Rogers., Julia A. Sims. (2015) Vocabulary for The New Science StandardsSyafrizal. (2017). Digital Storytelling: Teaching Aid for E-Learning to Improve the Quality of Nonformal Students of Teacher Trainingand Education. 3rd NFE Conference on Lifelong Learning. Serang: Untirta Press.Syafrizal, C. R. (2017). Teacher's Speaking Strategies At Vocational High School. The Journal Of English Language Studies, 66-83.Syafrizal, A. R. (2017 ). Code Mixing In Students’ Twitter Status At Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University In Banten, Indonesia . European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching , Volume 2 │ Issue 1 .Wallen, & Hyun. (2012). How to desing and evaluate research in educaton (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Differentiated Instruction
Authors

Syafrizal Syafrizal

Masrupi Masrupi

İstiqomatul Mauludah This is me

Publication Date September 15, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Syafrizal, S., Masrupi, M., & Mauludah, İ. (2019). The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.531412
AMA Syafrizal S, Masrupi M, Mauludah İ. The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video. JEGYS. September 2019;7(3):449-458. doi:10.17478/jegys.531412
Chicago Syafrizal, Syafrizal, Masrupi Masrupi, and İstiqomatul Mauludah. “The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7, no. 3 (September 2019): 449-58. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.531412.
EndNote Syafrizal S, Masrupi M, Mauludah İ (September 1, 2019) The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7 3 449–458.
IEEE S. Syafrizal, M. Masrupi, and İ. Mauludah, “The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video”, JEGYS, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 449–458, 2019, doi: 10.17478/jegys.531412.
ISNAD Syafrizal, Syafrizal et al. “The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 7/3 (September 2019), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.531412.
JAMA Syafrizal S, Masrupi M, Mauludah İ. The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video. JEGYS. 2019;7:449–458.
MLA Syafrizal, Syafrizal et al. “The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019, pp. 449-58, doi:10.17478/jegys.531412.
Vancouver Syafrizal S, Masrupi M, Mauludah İ. The Impact of Experiential Learning Method and Vocabolary Mastery Toward Indonesiaon Students’ Reading Comprehension Though Animation Video. JEGYS. 2019;7(3):449-58.