Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists
Research Article
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Cite

Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers

Year 2023, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1 - 13, 16.03.2023

Fatih DERELİ Tuğba TÜRK KURTÇA

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1215769

Abstract

This study is carried out within the scope of aim to determine the areas and courses of interest of gifted and talented students, using a survey research model among quantitative research design. Within this scope, data was obtained from 370 gifted students using stratified purposive sampling method with electronic forms created in two parts via Microsoft Forms. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS 22 packet data analysis program. Descriptive statistics and difference tests were utilized in the analysis of the data. As a result of the study, it was found that gifted and talented students are most interested in courses of chemistry, informatics and mathematics while courses of history, literature and philosophy were the least favored. Other findings of the study are significant differences in course interest of gifted children obtained according to the variables of gender, duration of education in SAC, type of identification area in SAC and type of program in SAC.

Keywords

Areas of interest, courses interests, gifted and talented student, lessons

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
  • Bakan, M. (2019). A study of developing course interest battery for gifted student [Unpublished master’s thesis], Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age. Learning & Leading With Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
  • Başar Daz, T. B., Karagölge, Z., & Ceyhun, İ. (2020). An investıgatıon of highly talented students' opinions about chemistry course: A sample of Erzurum SAC. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 41, 159-179. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.784362
  • Benbow, C.P. Lubinski, D., Shea, D.L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11 , 474-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00291
  • Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
  • Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in Math and Science: Do Mothers' Beliefs Matter 12 Years Later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97
  • Brigham, F. J. and Bakken, J. P. (2014). Assesment of individuals who are gifted and talented. In: A. F. Rotatori, J. P. Bakken and F. E. Obiakor (eds.). Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues. UK: Emerald, pp. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4013(2014)0000026002
  • Brown, E. F., & Stambaugh, T. L. (2014). Placement of students who are gifted. In J. P. Bakken, F. E. Obiakor & A. F. Rotatori (Eds.), Advances in Special Education. Vol. 26: Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues (pp. 41-69). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Castellano, J. A. (2011). Cultural competency: Implications for educational and instructionalleaders in gifted education. In J. A. Castellano & A. D. Frazier (Eds.),Special popula-tions in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds(pp. 383-400). Prufrock Press.
  • Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd Ed.). Pearson.
  • Çöllüoğlu Gülen, Ö. (2017). Analysis of gıfted students’ interest areas using data mining techniques [Unpublished doctoral disertation]. Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understand-ing gifted education. Teachers College Press.
  • Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Prufrock Press.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Ford, D. Y. (2011). Multicultural gifted education. Prufrock.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hall.
  • Güven Yıldırım, E. & Köklükaya, A.N. (2016). Güven Yıldırım, E. & Köklükaya, A.N. (2016). Determination of primary and secondary school students’ interest level toward the science topics. Amasya Education Journal, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17539/aej.20578
  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
  • Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
  • Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. InF. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.),Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 107-132). Prufrock.
  • Kaplan, S., & Hertzog, N. B. (2016). Pedagogy for Early Childhood Gifted Education. Gifted Child Today, 39(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516644637
  • Kelemen, G. (2020). Gifted children education in early childhood practical strategies. Journal Plus Education, 26(1), 165-170. https://doi>10.24250/JPE/1/2020/GK
  • Kenndy, D. M. (2002). Glimpses of a highly gifted child in a heterogeneous classroom. Roeper Review, 24(3), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554148
  • Kim, K. H., Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J. & Sriraman, B (Eds.) (2013). Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice. Sense Publishers.
  • Koshy, V. (2002). Teaching gifted children 4-7: A guide for teachers. David Fulton Publishers.
  • Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, (6)2, 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
  • Meador, K. (1996). Meeting the needs of young gifted students. Childhood Education, 73(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1996.10521891
  • National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC] (2006). Early childhood: Creating contexts for individualized learning in early childhood education: Early childhood position statement. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/Early%20Childhood%20Position%20Statement.pdf
  • National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC]. (2012).Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high-ability students. Author.
  • Němcová, M. (Ed.) (2016). Recognition and teaching gifted and talented children-good practice for Europe. Product of The Erasmus+ Project Talented Children. Retrieved from https://www.talentedchildrenproject.eu/images/zpravy/Recognition%20and%20Teaching%20Gifted.pdf
  • Nellis, L. M., & Gridley, B. E. (2000). Sociocultural Problem-Solving Skills in Preschoolers of High Intellectual Ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400104
  • OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. (2011). Gender and Other Group Differences in Performance on Off-Level Tests: Changes in the 21st Century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382574
  • Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2014). An Investigation of Gifted Students' Perceptions towards the Concept of Mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(2), 49-57.
  • Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls' and boys' achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208315834
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essential of gifted assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
  • Renkin, J. G. (2016). Engaging and challenging gifted students. ASCD.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). Cambridge University Press.
  • Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2019a). 2019-2020 Centers for Science and Arts Student Identification Booklet. Retrieved from https://orgm.MNE.gov.tr/MNE_iys_dosyalar/2019_11/15173608_TanYlama_KYlavuzu__YeYitek_Ekli_2.pdf
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2019b). Science and Arts Centers Directive. Retrieved from http://tebligler.MNE.gov.tr/index.php/tuem-sayilar/viewcategory/87-2019
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2020). National education statistics. Retrieved from https://sgb.MNE.gov.tr/MNE_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/04144812_MNE_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf
  • Sak, U. (2014). Üstün zekâlılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri (4th ed.). Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Schreglmann, S., & Öztürk, F. K. (2018). An evaluation of gifted students’ perceptions on critical thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.463711
  • Tomlinson, C. (2005). Quality curriculum and ınstruction for highly able students. Theory Into Practice, 44(2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10. 1207/s15430421tip4402_10
  • Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Year 2023, Volume 11, Issue 1, 1 - 13, 16.03.2023

Fatih DERELİ Tuğba TÜRK KURTÇA

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1215769

Abstract

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
  • Bakan, M. (2019). A study of developing course interest battery for gifted student [Unpublished master’s thesis], Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age. Learning & Leading With Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
  • Başar Daz, T. B., Karagölge, Z., & Ceyhun, İ. (2020). An investıgatıon of highly talented students' opinions about chemistry course: A sample of Erzurum SAC. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 41, 159-179. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.784362
  • Benbow, C.P. Lubinski, D., Shea, D.L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11 , 474-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00291
  • Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2
  • Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in Math and Science: Do Mothers' Beliefs Matter 12 Years Later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97
  • Brigham, F. J. and Bakken, J. P. (2014). Assesment of individuals who are gifted and talented. In: A. F. Rotatori, J. P. Bakken and F. E. Obiakor (eds.). Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues. UK: Emerald, pp. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4013(2014)0000026002
  • Brown, E. F., & Stambaugh, T. L. (2014). Placement of students who are gifted. In J. P. Bakken, F. E. Obiakor & A. F. Rotatori (Eds.), Advances in Special Education. Vol. 26: Gifted education: Current perspectives and issues (pp. 41-69). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Castellano, J. A. (2011). Cultural competency: Implications for educational and instructionalleaders in gifted education. In J. A. Castellano & A. D. Frazier (Eds.),Special popula-tions in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds(pp. 383-400). Prufrock Press.
  • Clark, B. (2013). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and at home (8th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd Ed.). Pearson.
  • Çöllüoğlu Gülen, Ö. (2017). Analysis of gıfted students’ interest areas using data mining techniques [Unpublished doctoral disertation]. Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understand-ing gifted education. Teachers College Press.
  • Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Prufrock Press.
  • Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th Ed.). Pearson.
  • Ford, D. Y. (2011). Multicultural gifted education. Prufrock.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hall.
  • Güven Yıldırım, E. & Köklükaya, A.N. (2016). Güven Yıldırım, E. & Köklükaya, A.N. (2016). Determination of primary and secondary school students’ interest level toward the science topics. Amasya Education Journal, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17539/aej.20578
  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001
  • Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
  • Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. InF. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.),Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed., pp. 107-132). Prufrock.
  • Kaplan, S., & Hertzog, N. B. (2016). Pedagogy for Early Childhood Gifted Education. Gifted Child Today, 39(3), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516644637
  • Kelemen, G. (2020). Gifted children education in early childhood practical strategies. Journal Plus Education, 26(1), 165-170. https://doi>10.24250/JPE/1/2020/GK
  • Kenndy, D. M. (2002). Glimpses of a highly gifted child in a heterogeneous classroom. Roeper Review, 24(3), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554148
  • Kim, K. H., Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J. & Sriraman, B (Eds.) (2013). Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice. Sense Publishers.
  • Koshy, V. (2002). Teaching gifted children 4-7: A guide for teachers. David Fulton Publishers.
  • Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, (6)2, 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
  • Meador, K. (1996). Meeting the needs of young gifted students. Childhood Education, 73(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1996.10521891
  • National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC] (2006). Early childhood: Creating contexts for individualized learning in early childhood education: Early childhood position statement. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/Early%20Childhood%20Position%20Statement.pdf
  • National Association for Gifted Children [NAGC]. (2012).Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high-ability students. Author.
  • Němcová, M. (Ed.) (2016). Recognition and teaching gifted and talented children-good practice for Europe. Product of The Erasmus+ Project Talented Children. Retrieved from https://www.talentedchildrenproject.eu/images/zpravy/Recognition%20and%20Teaching%20Gifted.pdf
  • Nellis, L. M., & Gridley, B. E. (2000). Sociocultural Problem-Solving Skills in Preschoolers of High Intellectual Ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400104
  • OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. (2011). Gender and Other Group Differences in Performance on Off-Level Tests: Changes in the 21st Century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382574
  • Öztürk, M., Akkan, Y., & Kaplan, A. (2014). An Investigation of Gifted Students' Perceptions towards the Concept of Mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(2), 49-57.
  • Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls' and boys' achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208315834
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essential of gifted assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302
  • Renkin, J. G. (2016). Engaging and challenging gifted students. ASCD.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). Cambridge University Press.
  • Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2019a). 2019-2020 Centers for Science and Arts Student Identification Booklet. Retrieved from https://orgm.MNE.gov.tr/MNE_iys_dosyalar/2019_11/15173608_TanYlama_KYlavuzu__YeYitek_Ekli_2.pdf
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2019b). Science and Arts Centers Directive. Retrieved from http://tebligler.MNE.gov.tr/index.php/tuem-sayilar/viewcategory/87-2019
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education [MNE] (2020). National education statistics. Retrieved from https://sgb.MNE.gov.tr/MNE_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/04144812_MNE_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf
  • Sak, U. (2014). Üstün zekâlılar: Özellikleri tanılanmaları eğitimleri (4th ed.). Vize Yayıncılık.
  • Schreglmann, S., & Öztürk, F. K. (2018). An evaluation of gifted students’ perceptions on critical thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.463711
  • Tomlinson, C. (2005). Quality curriculum and ınstruction for highly able students. Theory Into Practice, 44(2), 160-166. https://doi.org/10. 1207/s15430421tip4402_10
  • Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Education and Educational Research
Published Date March 2023
Journal Section Guidance and Counseling
Authors

Fatih DERELİ> (Primary Author)
TRAKYA UNIVERSITY
0000-0002-4102-1997
Türkiye

Tuğba TÜRK KURTÇA>
TRAKYA UNIVERSITY
0000-0002-4361-3769
Türkiye

Publication Date March 16, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023, Volume 11, Issue 1

Cite

Bibtex @research article { jegys1215769, journal = {Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists}, eissn = {2149-360X}, address = {editorjegys@gmail.com}, publisher = {Genç Bilge Yayıncılık}, year = {2023}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {1 - 13}, doi = {10.17478/jegys.1215769}, title = {Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers}, key = {cite}, author = {Dereli, Fatih and Türk Kurtça, Tuğba} }
APA Dereli, F. & Türk Kurtça, T. (2023). Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers . Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists , 11 (1) , 1-13 . DOI: 10.17478/jegys.1215769
MLA Dereli, F. , Türk Kurtça, T. "Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers" . Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 11 (2023 ): 1-13 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jegys/issue/75619/1215769>
Chicago Dereli, F. , Türk Kurtça, T. "Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers". Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 11 (2023 ): 1-13
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers AU - FatihDereli, TuğbaTürk Kurtça Y1 - 2023 PY - 2023 N1 - doi: 10.17478/jegys.1215769 DO - 10.17478/jegys.1215769 T2 - Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 13 VL - 11 IS - 1 SN - -2149-360X M3 - doi: 10.17478/jegys.1215769 UR - https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1215769 Y2 - 2023 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers %A Fatih Dereli , Tuğba Türk Kurtça %T Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers %D 2023 %J Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists %P -2149-360X %V 11 %N 1 %R doi: 10.17478/jegys.1215769 %U 10.17478/jegys.1215769
ISNAD Dereli, Fatih , Türk Kurtça, Tuğba . "Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers". Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 11 / 1 (March 2023): 1-13 . https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1215769
AMA Dereli F. , Türk Kurtça T. Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers. JEGYS. 2023; 11(1): 1-13.
Vancouver Dereli F. , Türk Kurtça T. Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2023; 11(1): 1-13.
IEEE F. Dereli and T. Türk Kurtça , "Turkish gifted students’ interests of courses and inclations of the talent fields: Example of Science and Art Centers", Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-13, Mar. 2023, doi:10.17478/jegys.1215769
 Download Cover Image

Submitted Articles: 589   Rejected Articles: 268 Published Articles: 320  Acceptance Rate:  %54   (Updated at February 9, 2022)

Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists indexed from SCOPUS June 2018- December 2020. SOBIAD Impact Factor Score (1,171) Top One of Turkey at SOBIAD Index at 2019. Thanks for the contributions. 3rd International Congress on Gifted Youth and Sustainability of the Education (ICGYSE) 10-11 December 2022 (Please click for attendance).

Dergimiz "Education Full Text (H.W.Wilson) Database Coverage List" tarafından dizinlenmektedir. HTML  PDF   JEGYS'nin kapsamı;  eğitim bilimleri, alan eğitimi (tüm alan eğitimleri), üstün zekalılar eğitimi, interdisipliner eğitim çalışmaları, eğitimde sürdürülebilirlik çalışmaları, yetenek eğitimi gibi konulardır. Yazarların, araştırmalarında; yeni yöntem, model, yaklaşım, yetenek gelişimi, ileri (advanced) eğitim yenilikleri, karakter eğitimi, eğitimde sürdürülebilirlik gibi yönlerinden birini ya da birkaçını vurgulamaları JEGYS'nin yayın hedeflerini gerçekleştirmesi açısından önemlidir. 

JEGYS NOT INDEXED citefactor

    21871  17854      25126  20742           17865                   22217           21870        SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) 25746257472574825749DHET Accredited Journal List (Department of Higher Education and Training of South Africa)
 

JOIN OUR EDITORIAL BOARD, PLEASE SEND YOUR CV TO EDITORJEGYS@GMAIL.COM



POPULARITY OF THE JEGYS OVER THE WORLD

                                                                 Free counters!

Note: Counter started on 28 February 2021

Giftedupoint.com Meeting point of the talent and giftedness

Young Wise Publishing/Genç Bilge Yayıncılık
Management-Publication Process-Office (Adress 1): 63 – 66 Hatton Garden, Fifth Floor, Suite 23, EC1N 8LE, London, UK
Web site: https://youngwisepub.com/ E-mail: info@youngwisepub.com

ISSN-Ownership-Office (Adress 2): Bahcelievler District 3015 St. No:9/1  Isparta, Turkey
Web site: http://gencbilgeyayincilik.com/ E-mail: gencbilgeyayincilik@gmail.com