Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places

Year 2025, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 147 - 159

Derya Sönmez

Abstract

In the rapidly changing world of the 21st century, technology-focused skills are reflected in educational environments in order to help individuals achieve success. Augmented reality applications are among the most important applications used in education. The aim of this research is to examine the social validity by determining the opinions of gifted students on augmented reality–supported differentiated instruction about historical places. In this research, a case study design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The hypothesis of the research is expressed as “the opinions of gifted students regarding augmented reality-supported teaching of historical places are positive.” The participants of the research consist of 12 gifted primary school 3rd grade students studying in a science and art center located in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Türkiye in the 2024-2025 academic year. The activity self-assessment form was used as the data collection tool. Descriptive analysis was used in the analysis of the data. The data obtained from the self-assessment form was transferred to writing without changing the student opinions. It was determined that the students had positive opinions regarding the teaching of historical places supported by augmented reality. It was determined that it provided permanent, fun and concrete learning for the students. Having different options while downloading the augmented reality application was seen as a difficulty. Activities can be designed for different lessons, topics and contents related to augmented reality, especially in teaching abstract concepts.

Keywords

Augmented reality Gifted students Teaching historical places Differentiated instruction Social validity

References

  • Akın, Ö., & Kızılaslan Tuncer, B. (2024). The effects of activities organized by augmented reality applications on the academic success of mathematics 4th grade course students. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(38), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29228/INESJOURNAL.75292
  • Aktaş, A. (2023). The effect of augmentation reality supported instructional activities on gifted students’ attitudes towards astronomy [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Akyol, A., & Anıl, Ö. (2024). Analysis of the effect of augmented reality applications in science course with mixed- meta method. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 91–125. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1197593
  • Aslan, S. (2021). The effect of augmented reality applications on students' success and learning retention in social studies course [Doctoral dissertation, Fırat University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47.
  • Basumatary, D., & Maity, R. (2023). Effects of augmented reality in primary education: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4695759
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). 30 essential skills for qualitative researchers (H. Özcan, Trans.). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Daniela, L., & Lytras, M. D. (2019). Editorial: Themed issue on enhanced educational experience in virtual and augmented reality. Virtual Reality, 23, 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00383-z
  • Demirbaş, İ., & Demir, F. B. (2018). Analysis of 2018 social studies course curriculum in terms of Turkey qualifications framework. Uşak University Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.1036175
  • Jamali, S., Shiratuddin, M. F., & Wong, K. (2014). A review of augmented reality (AR) and mobile-augmented reality (MAR) technology: Learning in tertiary education. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 20, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v20i02/48690
  • Karasar, Ş. (2004). New communication technologies in education: Internet and virtual higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 3(4), 117–125.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Life sciences course curriculum (Primary school 1st, 2nd and 3rd grades). https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=326
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2024a). Turkey century education model curriculum common text. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ortak-metin
  • Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2024b). Science and art centers support education framework curriculum.
  • Önal, N. T., & Önal, N. (2021). The effect of augmentation reality on the astronomy achievement and interest level of gifted students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4573–4599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 021-10474-7
  • Önal, N. (2017). Does augmented reality education application affect the academic motivation of primary school mathematics teacher candidates? Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research, 6(5), 2847–2857. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.347510
  • Özbey, D., & Arıcı, F. (2024). Examining the research on the use of augmented reality technology at primary school level. Anatolian Journal of Language and Education, 2(1), 29–46.
  • Özden Çınar, T. (2022). Attitudes of gifted students towards augmented reality and their views on its application in social studies course [Master’s thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  • Özeren, S., & Top, E. (2023). The effects of augmentation reality applications on the academic achievement and motivation of secondary school students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2023.11.1.425
  • Turan, Z., & Atila, G. (2021). Augmented reality technology in science education for students with specific learning hardships: Its effect on students’ learning and views. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1901682
  • Ünal, F., & Er, H. (2015). Evaluation of the views of gifted students on social studies course. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 16(1), 165–182. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59451/854136
  • Yeşilbursa, C. C. (2008). The use of historical places in social studies teaching. Turkish Science Studies, 23, 209– 222. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tubar/issue/16964/177166
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yıldırım, B., & Arıcıoğulları, S. (2024). The effect of using augmented reality applications in 6th grade science course on students' attitudes towards augmented reality applications. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 23(90), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1353803
  • Yılmaz, Z. A., & Batdı, V. (2016). A meta-analysis and thematic comparative analysis of the integration of augmented reality applications into education. Education and Science, 41(188), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6707
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education (Other)
Journal Section Differentiated Instruction
Authors

Derya Sönmez 0000-0003-1265-9059

Early Pub Date August 31, 2025
Publication Date September 3, 2025
Submission Date March 29, 2025
Acceptance Date July 4, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Sönmez, D. (2025). An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 13(3), 147-159.
AMA Sönmez D. An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places. JEGYS. August 2025;13(3):147-159.
Chicago Sönmez, Derya. “An Investigation into the Social Validity of Differentiated Instruction for Gifted Students Supported by Augmented Reality on the Topic of Historical Places”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 13, no. 3 (August 2025): 147-59.
EndNote Sönmez D (August 1, 2025) An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 13 3 147–159.
IEEE D. Sönmez, “An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places”, JEGYS, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 147–159, 2025.
ISNAD Sönmez, Derya. “An Investigation into the Social Validity of Differentiated Instruction for Gifted Students Supported by Augmented Reality on the Topic of Historical Places”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 13/3 (August2025), 147-159.
JAMA Sönmez D. An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places. JEGYS. 2025;13:147–159.
MLA Sönmez, Derya. “An Investigation into the Social Validity of Differentiated Instruction for Gifted Students Supported by Augmented Reality on the Topic of Historical Places”. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 13, no. 3, 2025, pp. 147-59.
Vancouver Sönmez D. An investigation into the social validity of differentiated instruction for gifted students supported by augmented reality on the topic of historical places. JEGYS. 2025;13(3):147-59.