Research Article

Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location

Volume: 37 Number: 4 December 23, 2025
EN TR

Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location

Abstract

The rise of population volume not only affects the current non-renewable energy sources but also renewable sources. Wind is one of the cleanest source of renewable energy. The design decision encompasses complex and conflicting parameters so that an analytical solution methodology for the problem consideration is necessary. In this study, considering the complex character of wind farm location selection problem, a two-phase fuzzy goal programming approach is applied. The aim of the model is to determine the appropriate locations of wind farms by considering the maximization of technical, social and economic objectives. The process of proper location determination consists of three main stages. The first stage is the determination of potential 30 districts from the Marmara Region and data collection. The second stage is the establishment and application of a single objective form of the model (social, technical and economic objective) separately. The third stage is the implementation of a multi-objective form with two-phase fuzzy goal programming approach. The proposed model is applied to the Marmara Region of Turkey. The most suitable alternatives have been selected out of 30 candidate districts. The inclusion of fuzzy logic within multi-objective approach provides proper evaluation of objectives’ satisfaction values. The results of the applied models identify Bozüyük, Taraklı, and Malkara districts as suitable locations for wind farms, based on the fulfillment of objective functions related to technical, social, and economic factors. The findings point out that on average 25% of total electricity demand can be met by installing the determined wind farms in selected locations.

Keywords

References

  1. URL 1. Elektrik. https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-elektrik, accessed 07.04.2025.
  2. Konstantinos, I., Georgios, T., & Garyfalos, A.. (2019). A Decision Support System methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: Case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece. Energy Policy, 132, 232–246.
  3. Sediqi, K.J. (2015), GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach For Land-Use Suitabili ty Analysis of Wind Farms: The Case Study of Karaburun Peninsula, Izmir-Turkey
  4. Değirmenci, S., Bingöl, F., & Sofuoglu, S. C. (2018). MCDM analysis of wind energy in Turkey: decision making based on environmental impact. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(20), 19753
  5. Langer, J., Zaaijer, M., Quist, J., & Blok, K. (2023). Introducing site selection flexibility to technical and economic onshore wind potential assessments: New method with application to Indonesia. Renewable Energy, 202, 320-335
  6. Villacreses, G., Gaona, G., Martínez-Gómez, J., & Jijón, D. J. (2017). Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador. Renewable Energy, 109, 275–286.
  7. Badi, I., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Muhammad, L. J. (2023). Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African, 19, e01511.
  8. Salvador, C. B., Arzaghi, E., Yazdi, M., Jahromi, H. A., & Abbassi, R. (2022). A multi-criteria decision-making framework for site selection of offshore wind farms in Australia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 224, 106196.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Industrial Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 23, 2025

Submission Date

May 5, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 37 Number: 4

APA
Kurt, S., Karaçam, H., Kılıç, H. S., & Aglan, C. (2025). Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 37(4), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.1689238
AMA
1.Kurt S, Karaçam H, Kılıç HS, Aglan C. Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location. JEPS. 2025;37(4):309-318. doi:10.7240/jeps.1689238
Chicago
Kurt, Sena, Havva Karaçam, Hüseyin Selçuk Kılıç, and Canan Aglan. 2025. “Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 37 (4): 309-18. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.1689238.
EndNote
Kurt S, Karaçam H, Kılıç HS, Aglan C (December 1, 2025) Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 37 4 309–318.
IEEE
[1]S. Kurt, H. Karaçam, H. S. Kılıç, and C. Aglan, “Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location”, JEPS, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 309–318, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.7240/jeps.1689238.
ISNAD
Kurt, Sena - Karaçam, Havva - Kılıç, Hüseyin Selçuk - Aglan, Canan. “Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 37/4 (December 1, 2025): 309-318. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.1689238.
JAMA
1.Kurt S, Karaçam H, Kılıç HS, Aglan C. Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location. JEPS. 2025;37:309–318.
MLA
Kurt, Sena, et al. “Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 37, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 309-18, doi:10.7240/jeps.1689238.
Vancouver
1.Sena Kurt, Havva Karaçam, Hüseyin Selçuk Kılıç, Canan Aglan. Multi Objective Approach for The Selection of Wind Farms’ Location. JEPS. 2025 Dec. 1;37(4):309-18. doi:10.7240/jeps.1689238