Research Article

Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing

Volume: 32 Number: 1 March 31, 2020
EN TR

Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Polyamide, commonly used in engineering plastics, has wear resistance and high strength. Hybrid manufacturing, using a combination of more than one production technique to benefit from the superiority of the manufacturing. In this study, polyamide, which is produced with casting and three-dimensional printer, has been drilled and reamed in numerical controlled machine. Thus, the effect of production technique, machining allowance and tool feed rate on hole surface and size quality was investigated. In general, the surface quality of the holes in the polyamide material produced by the two production techniques was directly affected by the machining allowance and the increased feed rate. In addition, the size of the holes created with the three-dimensional printer has reached the desired level after reaming process.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM F2792-12. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing Technologies, ASTM International, 2012.
  2. Guo N, Leu MC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, ; 8(3): 215-243.
  3. Wohlers T. Wohler’s Report 2016, Wohlers Associates, Inc., 2016.
  4. Petrick IJ, Simpson TW, 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research-Technology Management, 2013, 56(6): 12-16.
  5. Amanullah ANM, Murshiduzzamana, Saleha T, Khana R. Design and Development of a Hybrid Machine combining Rapid Prototyping and CNC Milling Operation. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 184: 163 – 170.
  6. Sealy MP, Madireddy G, Williams RE, RAO P, Toursangsaraki M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2018, 140, 6.
  7. Deopura BL, Lagirusamy R, Joshi M, Gupta B. Polyesters and polyamides. Cambridge, England, 2008.
  8. Kuram E. Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 88 : 85-100.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2020

Submission Date

April 18, 2019

Acceptance Date

December 10, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 32 Number: 1

APA
Tezel, T. (2020). Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 32(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453
AMA
1.Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32(1):1-7. doi:10.7240/jeps.555453
Chicago
Tezel, Tuğçe. 2020. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
EndNote
Tezel T (March 1, 2020) Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 1 1–7.
IEEE
[1]T. Tezel, “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”, JEPS, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.7240/jeps.555453.
ISNAD
Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32/1 (March 1, 2020): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
JAMA
1.Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32:1–7.
MLA
Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 1-7, doi:10.7240/jeps.555453.
Vancouver
1.Tuğçe Tezel. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020 Mar. 1;32(1):1-7. doi:10.7240/jeps.555453

Cited By