Article Review Process
1. The manuscripts should not be previously published work or should not be under consideration or peer review for publication elsewhere. Papers presented in congresses –on the condition that it has not been published as a full text in congress books– and manuscripts from dissertations with a footnote including the necessary information may be sent to the JER. Author(s) have the responsibility of all contents in the manuscripts.
2. All manuscripts submitted to the JER are subjected to a screening by the editorial board in terms of scope and writing rules. Editorial Board may reject the submissions which do not comply with the principles of the JER. After the screening screening, all manuscripts are sent to at least two external/independent referees for blind review. The referees are given 30 days and a new referee is appointed if any one of them does not express an opinion in the given period of time. Manuscripts are required to have an “issuable” report by at least two referees in order to be published. In case of any rejection from one of the referees, a third referee is appointed. Author(s) are responsible with the revisions (if any) recommended by the referee(s) in 30 days. The accepted manuscripts proceed to the publication process. After the proofreading process, a DOI number is assigned and the work is published in an upcoming issue depending on the decision of the Editorial Board.

Article evaluation criteria for reviewers
1. Narrative clarity
2. Presentation of aim, hypothesis and suggestions
3. Linking subject with related literature
4. Presentation of the emprical section
5. Sufficiency of analysis
6. Level of connection between subject and findings
7. Linking results with findings
8. Novelty/contribution level
9. Plagiarism/originality