Climate emergency-focused economic model

Abstract

This paper deals with the existing carbon dioxide mitigation efforts toward the Paris agreement and shows that current economic rules and the first law of thermodynamics, all of which are linear, are necessary but not sufficient tools to solve the nonlinear problems of global warming. In this respect, the quasi-linear, Pareto principle-based green economy has been modified by the second law of thermodynamics, which deals with the useful work potential of energy systems and resources for added value in society, aka exergy. It is argued that the aged Pareto principle, which may only associate with the first law of thermodynamics, recognizes less than half of the total root causes of emissions. For example, fossil fuels are currently treated as a simple economic commodity in the stock market, subject to market rules rather than environmental parameters, whereas exergy destructions are the primary root causes of emissions. A new model was developed for evaluating and rating green energy systems, which calculates the exergy destruction-based emissions and optimizes systems for minimum emissions. Five cases are presented to quantify the face value of the Pareto principle against renewable energy resources and systems. These cases are, namely, solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy with organic Rankine cycle, heat pumps, and Fresnel lenses for photovoltaic panels. Sample results show that the Pareto principle may not rate these systems because its equivalent unit exergy value (0.21 kWh/kWh), also described as virtual Pareto temperature (363.9 K), is less than the unit exergy of renewable energy systems under their normal domain of operations. One of these results regarding wind energy is that the 80/20 Pareto principle has equivalent unit exergy of 0.21 kW hexergy/kW henergy, corresponding to a wind velocity of three meters per second, which is less than the practical cut-in speed of a conventional wind turbine. Therefore, the Pareto principle may not be a measuring stick for wind energy and other resources. It has also been shown why the global average of rational exergy management efficiency of 0.21 is not improving because the Pareto principle limits it.

Keywords

• Carbon mitigation
• Climate emergency
• Concentrating solar
• Exergy-based economic model
• Exergy destructions
• Fresnel lenses
• Geothermal cogeneration
• Pareto temperature

References

1. [1] Kölmek, M.A., Navruz, İ. Forecasting the Day-Ahead Price in Electricity Balancing and Settlement Market of Turkey by Using Artificial Neural Networks. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci. 2015; 23: 841- 852.
2. [2] Internet Web-Site: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/prices-and-factors-affecting-prices.php, EIA. 2022. Electricity Explained, Factors Affecting Electricity Prices, 13.09.2022
3. [3] NBI. Cost Study of the Building Decarbonization Code, An Analysis of The Incremental First Cost and Life Cycle Cost of Two Common Building Types. New York, USA: Natural Resources Defense Council, NDRC, 2022.
4. [4] Kilkis, B. Optimum Urban Land-Use Model for Minimum CO2 Emissions Responsibility Under Energy and Exergy-Based Constraints, in 5th SEE SDEWES Conference; 22-26 May 2022: Vlore, Albania.
5. [5] Kilkis, B. An Exergy-Based Minimum Carbon Footprint Model for Optimum Equipment Oversizing and Temperature Peaking in Low-Temperature District Heating Systems. Energy 2021; 236 (2021): 121339.
6. [6] Kılkış, Ş. Energy System Analysis of a Pilot Net-Zero Exergy District. Energy Conversion and Management 2014; 87: 1077-1092.
7. [7] Internet Web-Site: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/european-green-deal_en, EC. Climate Action. European Green Deal, 2022, 13.09.2022
8. [8] Internet Web-Site: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement, UN. Climate Change, The Paris Agreement, 13.09.2022

9. [9] Indig, K. Power Laws and the Pareto Principle - Powerful Ideas. Blog articles.
10. [10] Quaschning, V. Technical and economic system comparison of photovoltaic and concentrating solar thermal power systems depending on annual global irradiation. Solar Energy 2004; 77: 171-178. 10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.011.
11. [11] Wang, C, Kilkis, Ş, Tjernström, J, Nyblom, J, Martinac. I. Multi-Objective Optimization and Parametric Analysis of Energy System Designs for The Albano University Campus in Stockholm. Procedia Engineering 2017; 180: 621- 630. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.221
12. [12] Arsie, I, Marano, V, Nappi, G, Rizzo, G. A Model of a Hybrid Power Plant with Wind Turbines and Compressed Air Energy Storage. In: PWR2005 ASME Power; 5-7 April 2005: Chicago, Illinois, pp. 987-1000. DOI: 10.1115/PWR2005-50187
13. [13] Kılkış, B, Kılkış, Ş. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları ile Birleşik Isı ve Güç Üretimi [Combined Heat and Power with Renewable Energy Resources], Ankara, TURKEY: TTMD Technical Publication 32, 215.
14. [14] Kılkis, B, Altinsel, M. A Combination of Fresnel Technology and Next-Generation Solar PVT System with Phase-Change Material and TEG Modules: FLPVT. In: ODAK2023 Kick-Off Event; 26 February 2020: EU, Ankara, Turkey, EU Solar Twins Project.
15. [15] Fikri, A, Mahendra, S, Pandey, AK, Kadirgama, K. Recent Progress and Challenges in Cooling Techniques of the Concentrated Photovoltaic Thermal System: A Review with Special Treatment on Phase Change Materials (PCMs) Based Cooling. Solar Energy Materials Solar Cells 2022; 241: 111739.