Potential of battery-electric buses in Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC): Emissions analysis and policy perspectives

Abstract

The Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) of Thailand, comprising Chonburi, Rayong, and Chachoengsao, is a major industrial hub where the public transport sector is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study assesses GHG emissions from fossil-fuel-powered buses and discusses the potential for transitioning to of battery-electric buses (BEBs). The assessment is conducted using a bottom-up approach compatible with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guideline principles. The assessment is based on 2019 activity data, disaggregated by route category (intra-provincial and inter-provincial) and by province. For inter-provincial routes, travel volumes were proportionally allocated to each province according to the distance traversed within its boundaries. Results indicate that inter-provincial routes account for approximately 89% of total emissions, with Chonburi alone contributing nearly half of the EEC total. Full electrification of these high-demand corridors, particularly when powered by renewable energy sources, offers substantial potential for emission reduction. Policy measures recommended include targeted infrastructure deployment, financial incentives, and integrated energy management strategies. The findings provide actionable insights for regional decarbonization planning and support Thailand’s broader sustainable transport goals.

Keywords

• Clean energy
• Decarbonization
• Electrification
• Policy
• Public transport

Supporting Institution

This work is partially supported by Chiang Mai University, Thailand, CMU Proactive Researcher.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank all relevant agencies for information in terms of data collection and technology details, especially the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO).

References

1. [1] Achariyaviriya, W, Suttakul, P, Fongsamootr, T, Mona, Y, Phuphisith, S, Tippayawong, KY. The social cost of carbon of different automotive powertrains: A comparative case study of Thailand. Energy Reports 2023; 9: 1144-1151. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.03.035
2. [2] Achariyaviriya, W, Suttakul, P, Phuphisith, S, Mona, Y, Wanison, R, Phermkorn, P. Potential reductions of CO2 emissions from the transition to electric vehicles: Thailand’s scenarios towards 2030. Energy Reports 2023; 9: 124-130. DOI: https: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.073
3. [3] Poolsawat, K, Wongsapai, W, Achariyaviriya, W, Tachajapong, W, Mona, Y, Wanison, R, Thawon, I, Suttakul, P. Cost-benefit analysis for transitioning Thailand’s passenger cars to electric drives. Journal of Energy Systems 2024; 8: 207-220. DOI: 10.30521/jes.1524048
4. [4] Suttakul, P, Wongsapai, W, Fongsamootr, T, Mona, Y, Poolsawat, K. Total cost of ownership of internal combustion engine and electric vehicles: A real-world comparison for the case of Thailand. Energy Reports 2022; 8: 545-553. DOI: 1016/j.egyr.2022.05.213
5. [5] Carbone, C, Sanzò, N, Dorsini, R, Nigliaccio, G, Di Florio, G, Cigolotti, V, Agostini, A. An economic and environmental assessment of different bus powertrain technologies in public transportation. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2025; 16: DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100250
6. [6] Chamier-Gliszczynski, N, Wyszomirski, A, Balewski, C, Kłodawski, M. Green Public Transport in Poland—Planning the Process of the Electrification of the Bus Fleet of Vehicles. Energies 2024; 17(24): DOI: 10.3390/en17246362
7. [7] Hensher, DA, Wei, E, Balbontin, C. Comparative assessment of zero emission electric and hydrogen buses in Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2022; 102: DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103130
8. [8] Chotanapund, V, Gheewala, SH, Strezov, V, Huda, N, Winijkul, E, Halog, A, Mungkalasiri, J, Prapaspongsa, T. Does the electric vehicle promotion policy drive Thailand's passenger transport towards environmental sustainability? Sustainable Production and Consumption 2024; 51: 23-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.029

9. [9] Alimujiang, A, Jiang, P. Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles—A case of Shanghai. Energy for Sustainable Development 2020; 55: 181-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.02.005
10. [10] Grijalva, ER, López Martínez, JM. Analysis of the Reduction of CO2 Emissions in Urban Environments by Replacing Conventional City Buses by Electric Bus Fleets: Spain Case Study. Energies 2019; 12(3): DOI: 10.3390/en12030525
11. [11] Ginting, MG, Reguyal, F, Cecilia, VM, Wang, K, Sarmah, AK. Electrification of public buses in Jakarta, Indonesia: A life cycle study. Sci Total Environ 2024; 914: 169875. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169875
12. [12] Blades, LAW, Matthews, T, McGrath, TE, Early, J, Cunningham, G, Harris, A. Predicting energy consumption of zero emission buses using route feature selection methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2024; 130: DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104158
13. [13] Achariyaviriya, W, Wongsapai, W, Janpoom, K, Katongtung, T, Mona, Y, Tippayawong, N, Suttakul, P. Estimating Energy Consumption of Battery Electric Vehicles Using Vehicle Sensor Data and Machine Learning Approaches. Energies 2023; 16(17): 6351. DOI: 10.3390/en16176351
14. [14] Achariyaviriya, W, Wongsapai, W, Rinchumphu, D, Tippayawong, N, Tippayawong, KY, Suttakul, P. A comparative study of vehicle powertrain efficiency: Data-driven analyzing energy consumption and environmental impact. Transportation Engineering 2024; 18: 100286. DOI: 10.1016/j.treng.2024.100286
15. [15] Janpoom, K, Suttakul, P, Achariyaviriya, W, Fongsamootr, T, Katongtung, T, Tippayawong, N. Investigating the influential factors in real-world energy consumption of battery electric vehicles. Energy Reports 2023; 9: 316-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.012
16. [16] Suttakul, P, Fongsamootr, T, Wongsapai, W, Mona, Y, Poolsawat, K. Energy consumptions and CO2 emissions of different powertrains under real-world driving with various route characteristics. Energy Reports 2022; 8: 554-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.216
17. [17] Szürke, SK, Saly, G, Lakatos, I. Analyzing Energy Efficiency and Battery Supervision in Electric Bus Integration for Improved Urban Transport Sustainability. Sustainability 2024; 16(18): DOI: 10.3390/su16188182
18. [18] Li, J-Q. Battery-electric transit bus developments and operations: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2014; 10(3): 157-169. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2013.872737
19. [19] Ribeiro, PJG, Dias, G, Mendes, JFG. Public Transport Decarbonization: An Exploratory Approach to Bus Electrification. World Electric Vehicle Journal 2024; 15(3): DOI: 10.3390/wevj15030081
20. [20] Logan, KG, Nelson, JD, Hastings, A. Electric and hydrogen buses: Shifting from conventionally fuelled cars in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2020; 85: DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102350
21. [21] Liu, X, Sun, X, Zheng, H, Huang, D. Do policy incentives drive electric vehicle adoption? Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2021; 150: 49-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.013
22. [22] Yánez, AH, González, CF, Yánez B, ER, Moreira B, K, Alvear D, J. Brief review on the implementation of charging stations for electric buses. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2024; 1434(1): 012014. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1434/1/012014
23. [23] Konečný, V, Gnap, J, Settey, T, Petro, F, Skrúcaný, T, Figlus, T. Environmental Sustainability of the Vehicle Fleet Change in Public City Transport of Selected City in Central Europe. Energies 2020; 13(15): DOI: 10.3390/en13153869
24. [24] Kistamah, H, Matsuo, M. The Mekong countries' land transport decarbonization and net-zero strategies: A comparative pilot study with the theory of change and text mining approach to policy analysis. Transport Policy 2025; 174: 103845. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103845
25. [25] Charoen-amornkitt, P, Nantasaksiri, K, Ruangjirakit, K, Laoonual, Y. Energy consumption and carbon emission assessment of battery swapping systems for electric motorcycle. Heliyon 2023; 9(12): e22887. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22887
26. [26] al Irsyad, MI, Inayah, I, Nugraheni, RD, Pandyaswargo, AH, Supriatna, NK, Purwanto, AJ, Firmansyah, AI, Harisetyawan, VTF, Gunawan, Y, Negara, IGNASP, Firman, FA. Research trends in the total cost of ownership for electric vehicles: A systematic literature review. Energy for Sustainable Development 2025; 87: 101746. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101746
27. [27] Ariyani, L, Aminullah, E, Hermawati, W, Febrianda, R, Rosadi, AHY, Dinaseviani, A. The global innovation system view for electric vehicles in Indonesia: Facilitating the transition to electric mobility in society. Sustainable Futures 2025; 9: 100741. DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100741
28. [28] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national GHG inventories: Volume 2 – Energy. 2006.
29. [29] Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) “Excellent hub for aircraft manufacturing and maintenance”.
30. [30]Department of Land Transport, Ministry of Transport, Thailand. DLT transport statistics webpage. URL: https://web.dlt.go.th/statistics
31. [31]Department of Land Transport, Ministry of Transport, Thailand. DLT official website. URL: https://www.dlt.go.th/
32. [32] Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization. TGO official website. URL: https://www.tgo.or.th/
33. [33] Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning, Ministry of Transport, Thailand. Summary of the study on tracking energy reduction from double-track railway development (in Thai). Bangkok, Thailand: Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning (OTP), 2022.
34. [34] Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Thailand. Energy Balance of Thailand 2022 (in Thai). Bangkok, Thailand: Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy (DEDE), 2022.