Research Article

A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils

Volume: 2 Number: 4 December 31, 2018
EN

A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils

Abstract

Wind energy has been seen as one of the most suitable sources of renewable energy. Wind energy is low cost when compared the other sources. Therefore, wind energy can gain an edge over the fossil-fired power plants. Aerodynamic efficiency of the airfoil is very crucial for aerodynamic efficiency of the wind turbine. The primary purpose of our study was to analyze the NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoil at various attack angles with constant Reynolds number and to examine the effects of the symmetrical and asymmetrical profiles of the airfoil. Analysis of aerodynamic performance of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoil were performed with using ANSYS Fluent program. Also, lift coefficients and drag coefficients were calculated at various attack angles.  According to calculations, optimum attack angles were found for each profile. Finally, NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils were discussed and reported in terms of their airfoil performances.

Keywords

References

  1. Chandrala, M., Aerodynamic Analysis of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2012; (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622. Vol. 2, Issue6, pp.1244-1248.
  2. Patil, S., Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade at Various Angles of Attack and Different Reynolds Number. International Conference on Computational Heat and Mass Transfer, Procesia Enginering. 2015; 127, pp.1363-1369.
  3. Dash, A., CFD Analysis of Wind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-334X. Volume 13, Issue 4 Ver. II, pp.18-24.
  4. Reddy, A., A Brief Research, Study, Design and Analysis on Wind turbine. Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), 2015; Vol. 5 Issue10.
  5. Rubel, R.I., Uddin, M.K. Islam, M.Z. and Rokunuzzaman, M., Comparison of Aerodynamics Characteristics of NACA 0015 & NACA 4415. Preprints 2016.
  6. Hossain, S., A Comparative Flow Analysis of Naca 6409 and Naca 4412 Aerofoil. IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2014; eISSN: 2319-1163 pISSN: 2321-7308. Volume 3, Issue 10.
  7. Najar, A., Blade Design and Performance Analysis of Wind Turbine. International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN, 2013; IJCRGG ISSN: 0974-4290. Vol.5, No.2, pp 1054-1061.
  8. Burton, T., Jenkins, N, Sharpe, D. and Bossanyi, E. Wind Energy Handbook. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2011; 65-67.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Mechanical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2018

Submission Date

August 17, 2018

Acceptance Date

September 24, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 4

APA
Yılmaz, M., Köten, H., Çetinkaya, E., & Coşar, Z. (2018). A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils. Journal of Energy Systems, 2(4), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.454193
AMA
1.Yılmaz M, Köten H, Çetinkaya E, Coşar Z. A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils. Journal of Energy Systems. 2018;2(4):145-159. doi:10.30521/jes.454193
Chicago
Yılmaz, Mustafa, Hasan Köten, Erkan Çetinkaya, and Ziya Coşar. 2018. “A Comparative CFD Analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 Airfoils”. Journal of Energy Systems 2 (4): 145-59. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.454193.
EndNote
Yılmaz M, Köten H, Çetinkaya E, Coşar Z (December 1, 2018) A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils. Journal of Energy Systems 2 4 145–159.
IEEE
[1]M. Yılmaz, H. Köten, E. Çetinkaya, and Z. Coşar, “A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils”, Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 145–159, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.30521/jes.454193.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Mustafa - Köten, Hasan - Çetinkaya, Erkan - Coşar, Ziya. “A Comparative CFD Analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 Airfoils”. Journal of Energy Systems 2/4 (December 1, 2018): 145-159. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.454193.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz M, Köten H, Çetinkaya E, Coşar Z. A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils. Journal of Energy Systems. 2018;2:145–159.
MLA
Yılmaz, Mustafa, et al. “A Comparative CFD Analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 Airfoils”. Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 2, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 145-59, doi:10.30521/jes.454193.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Yılmaz, Hasan Köten, Erkan Çetinkaya, Ziya Coşar. A comparative CFD analysis of NACA0012 and NACA4412 airfoils. Journal of Energy Systems. 2018 Dec. 1;2(4):145-59. doi:10.30521/jes.454193

Cited By

Journal of Energy Systems is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0