Research Article

Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market

Volume: 4 Number: 4 December 31, 2020
EN

Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market

Abstract

Recently, feed-in-tariff (FIT) is no longer under government’s preference due to fiscal support limits and reluctance of utility to purchase RE-based electricity at higher price. Indeed, the absence of any incentives will significantly impact to renewable market growth. Therefore, net metering/billing implemented, but sometimes its price is unfairly offered in comparison with utility retail price. To seek more interesting model that can benefit to government utility and people, a so-called mechanism peer-to-peer (P2P) is proposed as alternative solution in this study. This study investigates an applicability of this new energy trading mechanism in vertically integrated unit electricity market (regulated market), by comparing this mechanism with the existing mechanism e.g. net metering/billing. The P2P was studied using a built-own optimization tool (in excel base) to determine its economic analysis, its market price and cost-benefit for utility and P2P participants. As a result, using P2P, each participant which install solar photovoltaic (solar PV) can fasten their payback period up to 2 years from its net metering payback, raise internal rate of return (IRR) by 2-3%, obtain 500 US$ net present value (NPV) for prosumer only (a consumer with electricity generator such as solar PV) and 3,000 US$ for prosumer with storage system in comparison with its analysis with existing net metering. Besides, P2P also brings monetized benefits for a single-buyer utility than its lost market. This study also show that P2P is institutionally feasible for regulated market with any restriction to sell electricity from non-utility entities.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Universitas Indonesia

Project Number

NKB-0460/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019

Thanks

University of Indonesia and Tropical Renewable Energy Center

References

  1. [1] World Energy Council. World Energy Trilemma 2017. London: World Energy Council, 2017.
  2. [2] Long, C, Wu, J, Zhang, C, Cheng, M, Al-Wakeel, A. Feasibility of peer-to-peer energy trading in low voltage electrical distribution networks. Energy Procedia 2017; 105: 2227-2232. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.632
  3. [3] Long, C, Wu, J, Zhou, Y, Jenkins, N. Peer-to-peer energy sharing through a two-stage aggregated battery control in a community Microgrid. Applied Energy 2018; 226: 261-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.097
  4. [4] Zhang, C, Wu, J, Long, C, Cheng, M. Review of existing Peer-to-peer energy trading projects. Energy Procedia 2017; 105: 2563-2568. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.737
  5. [5] Sousa, T, Soares, T, Pinson, P, Moret, F, Baroche, T, Sorin, E. Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019; 104: 367-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.036
  6. [6] Roy, A, Bruce, A, MacGill, I. The potential value of peer-to-peer energy trading in the Australian national electricity market. In: APSRC 2016 Asia Pacific Solar Research Conference; 29 November- 1 December 2016: Australian PV Institute
  7. [7] IRENA. Electricity Storage and Renewables: Costs and Markets to 2030. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2017.
  8. [8] Park, C, Yong, T. Comparative review and discussion on P2P electricity trading. Energy Procedia 2017; 128: 3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.003

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2020

Submission Date

June 4, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 17, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 4 Number: 4

APA
Pranadi, A. D., & Setiawan, E. (2020). Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market. Journal of Energy Systems, 4(4), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.748138
AMA
1.Pranadi AD, Setiawan E. Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market. Journal of Energy Systems. 2020;4(4):179-195. doi:10.30521/jes.748138
Chicago
Pranadi, Aloysius Damar, and Eko Setiawan. 2020. “Cost Benefit Analysis for Peer-to-Peer Mechanism in Residential Sector of a Single Buyer Electricity Market”. Journal of Energy Systems 4 (4): 179-95. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.748138.
EndNote
Pranadi AD, Setiawan E (December 1, 2020) Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market. Journal of Energy Systems 4 4 179–195.
IEEE
[1]A. D. Pranadi and E. Setiawan, “Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market”, Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 179–195, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.30521/jes.748138.
ISNAD
Pranadi, Aloysius Damar - Setiawan, Eko. “Cost Benefit Analysis for Peer-to-Peer Mechanism in Residential Sector of a Single Buyer Electricity Market”. Journal of Energy Systems 4/4 (December 1, 2020): 179-195. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.748138.
JAMA
1.Pranadi AD, Setiawan E. Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market. Journal of Energy Systems. 2020;4:179–195.
MLA
Pranadi, Aloysius Damar, and Eko Setiawan. “Cost Benefit Analysis for Peer-to-Peer Mechanism in Residential Sector of a Single Buyer Electricity Market”. Journal of Energy Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, Dec. 2020, pp. 179-95, doi:10.30521/jes.748138.
Vancouver
1.Aloysius Damar Pranadi, Eko Setiawan. Cost benefit analysis for peer-to-peer mechanism in residential sector of a single buyer electricity market. Journal of Energy Systems. 2020 Dec. 1;4(4):179-95. doi:10.30521/jes.748138

Cited By

Journal of Energy Systems is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0