Performance of a combined power and cooling system under solar, solar storage and storage mode of operations

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 18 - 32, 31.03.2022

Tapan Gogoi Utpal Dutta

https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.952032

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, the performances of a combined power and cooling system are compared at solar, solar storage (SS), and storage mode of operations using therminol–LT (TLT) and solar salt as storage media. In the solar mode, the entire water heated in a collector field is used to drive subsequently an organic Rankine cycle and an absorption cooling system. In the SS mode during high radiation (950 W/m2), thermal energy storage (TES) is used to store a fraction of hot water for later use during the storage mode at nighttime. The system produced 1.1 MW of power and 2.455 MW of cooling during the solar mode at low radiation (640 W/m2). At the SS mode, with TLT as a storage fluid, the power increased to double, however the cooling reduced by 12.22%. During the storage mode, the TLT based system produced 0.553 MW of cooling. During the SS mode with solar salt, the power and cooling increased, however, the nighttime cooling reduced significantly with solar salt. The total energy and the overall system efficiency was more with solar salt compared to those of TLT. The energy output and the system efficiency were the maximum at 950 W/m2 without TES.

Keywords

Combined power and cooling, Organic rankine cycle, Performance, Solar absorption cooling system

References

• [1]     Li, J., Pei, G., P, Jiie, J. Optimization of low temperature solar thermal electric generation with organic rankine cycle in different areas. Applied Energy 2010; 87(11):3355-–65.
• [2]     Prabhu E. Solar trough organic rankine electricity system (stores) stage 1: powerplant optimization and economics. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2006; California, USA: NREL/SR-550–39433.
• [3]     Delgado-Torres, A.M., García-Rodríguez, L. Analysis and optimization of the low temperature solar organic rankine cycle (ORC).Energy Conversion and Management 2010; 51:2846–2856.
• [4]     Bellos, E., Tzivanidis, C., Investigation of a hybrid ORC driven by waste heat and solar energy. Energy Conversion Management 2018; 156: 427–439.
• [5]     F. Assilzadeh, F., Kalogiro,S.A., Ali,Y., Sopian, K. Simulation and optimization of a LiBr solar absorption cooling system with evacuated tube collectors, Renewable Energy 2005;30:1143–1159.
• [6]     Liu, YL, Wang, R. Performance prediction of a solar/gas driving double effect LiBr–H2O absorption system. Renewable Energy2004; 29:1677–1695.
• [7]     Li, Z., Ye, X., Liu, J. Performance analysis of solar air cooled double effect LiBr/H2Oabsorption cooling system in subtropical city. Energy Conversion and Management 2004; 85:302–312.
• [8]     Al-Sulaiman, F.A., Hamdullahpur, F., Dincer, I. Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renewable Energy 2012; 48:161–172.
• [9]     Marin, A., Untea, A., Grosu, L., Dobrovicescu, A., Queiros-Conde, D. Performance evaluation of a combined organic Rankine cycle and an absorption refrigeration system. Termotehnica2013; 1: 81–90.
• [10] Eisavi, B., Khalilarya, S., Chitsaz, A., Rosen, M.A. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling, heating and power system driven by solar energy. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018; 129: 1219–1229.
• [11] Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., Deng, S., Ni, J., Xu, W., Maa, M., Lin, S., Yu, Z. Solar driven ORC based CCHP: comparative performance analysis between sequential and parallel system configurations. Applied Thermal Enggineering2018; 131:696–706.
• [12] Sharifishourabi, M., Chadegani, E.A. Performance assessment of a new organic Rankine cycle based multi generation system integrated with a triple effect absorption system. Energy Convers Manage 2017; 150: 787–99.
• [13] Gogoi, T.K., Saikia, S. Performance analysis of a solar heat driven organic rankine cycle and absorption cooling system. Thermal Science and Engineering Process 2019; 13: 100372.
• [14] Cioccolanti, L., Hamedani, S.R., Villarini, M. Environmental and energy assessment of a small-scale solar Organic Rankine Cycle trigeneration system based on Compound Parabolic Collectors. Energy Convers Manage 2019; 198: 111829.
• [15] Wang, S., Fu, Z. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of solar assisted CCHP-ORC system with DME as fuel. Energy Conversion and Management 2019; 186: 535–45.
• [16] Gogoi, T.K., Hazarika, P. Comparative assessment of four novel solar based triple effect absorption refrigeration systems integrated with organic Rankine and Kalina cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020; 226:113561.
• [17] Nondy, J., Gogoi, T.K. Comparative performance analysis of four different combined power and cooling systems integrated with a topping gas turbine plant. Energy Conversion and Management 2020; 223:113242.
• [18] Forristal, R. Heat transfer analysis and modelling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in Engineering Solver Equation. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2003, Golden, CO. (US); No. NREL/TP-550-34169.
• [19] Technical Manuel: THERMINOL LT: Heat Transfer Fluids by SOLUTIA, Combined Heating and Cooling Liquid and Vapour Phase Heat Transfer Fluid in the temperature range from C to 315 C, Applied Chemistry, Creative solution.
• [20] Modi, A., Pe´rez-Segarra, C.D. Thermocline thermal storage systems for concentrated solar power plants: One-dimensional numerical model and comparative analysis. Solar Energy 2014; 100: 84–93
• [21] Patek, J., Klomfar, J.A. computationally effective formulation of the thermodynamic properties of LiBr–H2O solutions from 273 to 500 K over full composition range. International Journal of Refrigeration2006; 29(4): 566–78.
• [22] Wagner, W., Cooper, J.R., Dittmann, A., Kijima, J., Kretzschmar, H.J., Kruse, A. IAPWS. The Industrial Formulation, for the thermodynamic properties of water and steam. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 2000; 122: 150–181.