Lab-scale biogas production from co-digestion of super-intensive shrimp sludge and potential biomass feedstocks

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 131 - 142, 31.03.2022

Nam Tran Thao Huynh Van Khanh Huynh Luan Nguyen Ngan Nguyen Diem Huynh Danh Dinh Cong Nguyen

https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.973569

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study evaluated biogas production potentials from local biomass feedstocks comprising of rice straw (RS), steamed lemongrass (SL), bagasse (BA) and desiccated coconut (DC) on super-intensive shrimp sludge (SS) anaerobic digestion. A series of batch anaerobic digestion experiments was conducted at an organic loading rate of 50 g-VS L-1 and a C/N ratio of 25 under mesophilic conditions. The results indicate that co-digested biomass substrates are more suitable than single sludge except for DC supplementation, which exhibited a severe pH inhibition for methanogenesis activities. A reactor supplemented with BA achieved the highest overall biogas production (126.78 L kg-VSadded-1), which increased biogas yields 53.70% compared to a mono-sludge reactor. Furthermore, reactors with RS and SL increased biogas yields by 26.40% and 29.21%, respectively. Irrespective of initial materials, the H2S concentration in biogas compositions was measured at very high levels (23,710 - 65,040 ppm) after 10-15 days of digestion, while a decreasing trend was recorded for the remaining digestion period (16 - 60 days), yet still maintained relatively high levels (5,873 - 9,155 ppm). The study suggests that future works should focus on pH neutralization within the reactor with DC substrates and H2S removal in biogas composition.

Keywords

Batch anaerobic digestion, Biogas production, Biomass feeding, Co-digestion, Shrimp sludge, Super-intensive shrimp cultivation

Supporting Institution

YUKO-KEISO CO. LTD. JAPAN

Thanks

The authors are very thankful to YUKO-KEISO CO., LTD, JAPAN for funding this research. We also thank Dr. Nigel K. Downes (Researcher - CMI Integrated Expert at Can Tho University) for proofreading the manuscript.

References

• [1] Ye, J, Li, D, Sun, Y, Wang, G, Yuan, Z, Zhen, F, Wang, Y. Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure. Waste Management 2013; 33: 2653–2658 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.014.
• [2] Li, J, Wei, L, Duan, Q, Hu, G, Zhang, G. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with three crop residues for biogas production, Bioresource Technology 2014; 156: 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.064.
• [3] Luo, G, Ma, N, Li, P, Tan, H, Liu, W. Enhancement of Anaerobic Digestion to Treat Saline Sludge from Recirculating Aquaculture Systems. The Scientific World Journal 2015; 2015:1–5. DOI: 10.1155/2015/479101.
• [4] Srisertpol, J, Srinakorn, P, Kheawnak, A, and Chamniprasart, K. Estimation of Biogas Production from Shrimp Pond Sediment Using the Artificial Intelligence. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2012; 260–261: 695–700. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.260-261.695.
• [5] Srivichai, P, Chavalparit, O. Co-digestion of modified tapioca starch sludge and shrimp pond sediment as a method to improve system stability and biogas production. ScienceAsia 2020; 46:1-9. DOI: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2020.017.
• [6] Chen, Y, Cheng, JJ, Creamer, KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology 2007; 99:4044–4064. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057.
• [7] Zhang, J, Zhang, R, He, Q, Ji, B, H, Wang, Yang, K. Adaptation to salinity: Response of biogas production and microbial communities in anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste to salinity stress. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 2020. 130:173–178. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.11.011.
• [8] Wang, X, Lu, X, Li, F, Yang, G. Effects of Temperature and Carbon-Nitrogen (C/N) Ratio on the Performance of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure, Chicken Manure and Rice Straw: Focusing on Ammonia Inhibition. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:1-7. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097265.
• [9] Yan, L, Liu, C, Zhang, Y, Liu, S, Zhang, Y. Effects of C/N ratio variation in swine biogas slurry on soil dissolved organic matter: Content and fluorescence characteristics. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2021; 209:111804. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111804.
• [10] Yadvika, S, Sreekrishnan, TR, Kohli, S, Rana, V. Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques––a review. Bioresource Technology 2004; 95:1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010.
• [11] Shahbaz, M, Ammar, M, Korai, RM, Ahmad, N, Ali, A, Khalid, MS, Zou, D, Li, X. Impact of C/N ratios and organic loading rates of paper, cardboard and tissue wastes in batch and CSTR anaerobic digestion with food waste on their biogas production and digester stability. SN Applied Sciences 2020; 2: 1436. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03232-w.
• [12] Shiratori, Y, Yamakawa, T, Sakamoto, M, Yoshida, H, Kitaoka, T, Tran, QT, Doan, DCT, Dang, MC. Biogas Production from Local Biomass Feedstock in the Mekong Delta and Its Utilization for a Direct Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2017; 5: 25. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00025.
• [13] Diep, NQ, Sakanishi, K, Nakagoshi, N, Fujimoto, S, Minowa, T. Potential for rice straw ethanol production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Renewable Energy 2015; 74: 456–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.051.
• [14] Yamakawa, T, Matsubara, H, Shimizu, H, Sakamoto, M, Giang, TT, Shiratori, Y. Lab–scale Methane Fermentation Using Shrimp Pond Sludge and Some Available Biomass on Bên Tre in Vietnam. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 2020; 65: 249–255. DOI: 10.5109/4103700.
• [15] Nam, TS, Thao, HV, Ngan, NVC, Kjeld, I. Bio-pretreatment Enhances Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Pig Manure. International Energy Journal 2021; 21:457-466.
• [16] APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation, Washington DC, USA.
• [17] Zahan, Z, Othman, MZ, Muster, TH. Anaerobic digestion/co-digestion kinetic potentials of different agro-industrial wastes: A comparative batch study for C/N optimisation. Waste management 2018; 71:663-674. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.014.
• [18] Karthikeyan, OP, Visvanathan, C. Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophilic dry anaerobic digester. Bioresource Technology 2012; 113:294-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.028.
• [19] Park, S, Li, Y. Evaluation of methane production and macronutrient degradation in the anaerobic co-digestion of algae biomass residue and lipid waste. Bioresource Technology 2012; 111:42–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.160.
• [20] Lin, J, Zuo, J, Gan, L, Li, P, Liu, F, Wang, K, Chen, L, Gan, H. Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2011. 23: 1403–1408. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60572-4.
• [21] Wang, F, Hidaka, T, Tsuno, H, Tsubota, J. Co-digestion of polylactide and kitchen garbage in hyperthermophilic and thermophilic continuous anaerobic process. Bioresource Technology 2012; 112: 67–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.064.
• [22] Pöschl, M, Ward, S, Owende, P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Applied Energy 2010; 87:3305–3321. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011.
• [23] Nam, TS, Hong, LND, Thao, HV, Chiem, NH, Viet, LH, Kjeld, I, Ngan, NVC. Enhancing biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and pig manure. Journal of Vietnamese Environment 2016; 8: 195-199. DOI: 10.13141/jve.vol8.no3.pp195-199.
• [24] Chen, Y, Jiang, X, Xiao, K, Shen, N, Zeng, RJ, Zhou, Y. Enhanced volatile fatty acids (VFAs) production in a thermophilic fermenter with stepwise pH increase – Investigation on dissolved organic matter transformation and microbial community shift. Water Research 2017; 112: 261–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.067.
• [25] Ye, J, Dong, L, Yongming, S, Guohui, W, Zhenhong, Y, Feng, Z, Yao, W. Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure. Waste Management 2013; 33: 2653. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.014.
• [26] Mao, C, Zhang, T, Wang, X, Feng, Y, Ren, G, Yang, G. Process performance and methane production optimizing of anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and corn straw. Scientific Report 2017; 79379. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09977-6.
• [27] Srisowmeya, G, Chakravarthy, M, Devi, GN. Critical considerations in two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020; 119: 109587. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109587.
• [28] Keramati, M, Beiki, H. The effect of pH adjustment together with different substrate to inoculum ratios on biogas production from sugar beet wastes in an anaerobic digester. Journal of Energy Management and Technology 2017; 1:1705-1016. DOI: 10.22109/jemt.2017.87623.1016.
• [29] Hajji, M, A, Rhachi, M, M, Garoum, M, Laaroussi, N. The effects of pH, temperature and agitation on biogas production under mesophilic regime. In: REDEC 2016 3rd International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries; 13-15 July 2016: IEEE, pp. 4. DOI: 10.1109/REDEC.2016.7577510.
• [30] Vongvichiankul, C, Deebao, J, Khongnakorn, W. Relationship between pH, Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) and Biogas Production in Mesophilic Screw Anaerobic Digester. Energy Procedia 2017; 138: 877–882. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.113.
• [31] Zhong, B, An, X, Shen, F, An, W, Zhang, Q. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Rice Straw and Pig Manure Pretreated With a Cellulolytic Microflora: Methane Yield Evaluation and Kinetics Analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021; 8: 579405. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.579405.
• [32] Callaghan, FJ, Wase, DAJ, Thayanithy, K, Forster, CF. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2002; 22: 1-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5.
• [33] Comino, E, Riggio, VA, Rosso, M. Biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and cheese whey. Bioresource Technology 2012; 114: 46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.090.
• [34] Ameen F, Ranjitha, J, Ahsan, N, Shankar, V. Co-digestion of microbial biomass with animal manure in three-stage anaerobic digestion. Fuel 2021; 306: 121746. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121746.
• [35] Ogata, Y, Ishigaki, T, Nakagawa, M, Yamada, M. Effect of increasing salinity on biogas production in waste landfills with leachate recirculation: A lab-scale model study. Biotechnology Reports 2016; 10: 111–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2016.04.004
• [36] Lee, C, Kim, J, Shin, SG, O’Flaherty, V, Hwang, S. Quantitative and qualitative transitions of methanogen community structure during the batch anaerobic digestion of cheese-processing wastewater. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010; 87:1963–1973. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2685-1.
• [37] Singh, TS, Sankarlal, P. A Review on Advancements in Biogas Technologies. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2015. TTTCON-2015 Conference Proceedings.
• [38] Weiland, P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010; 85: 849-860. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7.
• [39] Rajendran, K, Aslanzadeh, S, Taherzadeh, MJ. Household Biogas Digesters—A Review. Energies 2012; 5: 2911-2942. DOI: 10.3390/en5082911.
• [40] Ngan, NVC, Francis, M, MSC, Nam, TS, Thao, HV, Monet, CMD, Hung, DV, Cuong, DM, Hung, NV. Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw for Biogas Production in Sustainable Rice Straw Management, M. Gummert, N. V. Hung, P. Chivenge, and B. Douthwaite, Eds. Cham. Springer International Publishing 2020; 65–92. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_5.
• [41] Monteleone, G, Francesco, MD, Galli, S, Marchetti, M, Naticchioni, V. Deep H2S removal from biogas for molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) systems. Chemical Engineering Journal 2011; 173:407–414. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.078..
• [42] Cristiano, DM, Mohedano, R, Nadaleti, WC, de Castilhos Junior, AB, Lourenço, VA, Gonçalves, DFH, Filho, PB. H2S adsorption on nanostructured iron oxide at room temperature for biogas purification: Application of renewable energy. Renewable Energy 2020; 154:151–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.054.
• [43] Fortuny, M, Gamisans, X, Deshusses, MA, Lafuente, J, Casas, C, Gabriel, D. Operational aspects of the desulfurization process of energy gases mimics in biotrickling filters. Water Research 2011; 45: 5665–5674. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.029.