Assessment and improvement plan of the sustainability index in the development of palm bioenergy for Riau province electricity in Indonesia as a case study
Year 2025,
Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 12 - 22
Afdhol Rinaldi
Nasrullah Djamil
Nazruddin Safaat Harahap
,
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Nadia Sandi Putri
Abstract
Riau province in Indonesia plays an essential role in meeting the nation's energy needs with its rich biodiversity and significant agricultural potential, particularly in palm oil. Palm oil cultivation, which spans vast areas in Riau, contributes substantially to plant-based fuel production. However, energy challenges persist, especially in remote areas lacking of reliable electricity. This research assesses the sustainability of palm oil-based bioenergy focusing on PT Perkebunan Nusantara V (PTPN-V). The study evaluates environmental, social, and economic dimensions using sustainability indicators such as GHG emissions, soil quality, and income changes. Methods include literature reviews, field surveys, and system analysis using Fuzzy AHP and MDS for sustainability index evaluation. Results show a moderately sustainable development score of 56.14%, balancing environmental, social, and economic performances. The analysis identifies five key sensitive attributes that inform the overall sustainability status of 56.41% for PKS Terantam, serving as a benchmark for future improvements.
Thanks
We express our sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to the successful completion of this research project, "Plan for Assessment and Improvement of the Sustainability Index in the Development of Palm Bioenergy for Electricity (Case Study: PT. Perkebunan Nusantara – 5, Riau Province)."
First and foremost, we thank the management and staff of PT. Perkebunan Nusantara – 5 for their invaluable cooperation and support throughout the research process. Their willingness to share insights and data has been instrumental in the comprehensive understanding of the palm bioenergy development scenario in Riau Province.
We are also grateful to Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim for their financial support, which made this research possible. Their commitment to advancing sustainable practices in bioenergy development aligns with the goals of our study.
Lastly, we acknowledge our colleagues and research team members who contributed tirelessly to data collection, analysis, and the overall execution of this research. This research would not have been possible without the collective efforts and support of everyone mentioned above. Thank you for being an integral part of this endeavor.
References
- [1] BPS. Riau Dalam Angka Tahun 2019. 2019.
- [2] PLN. Statistik PLN Tahun 2020. 2020.
- [3] PTPN-5. PTPN 5 Targets Four Biogas Generators in 2021 [Internet]. https://ptpn5.com/
- [4] Caroko W, Komarudin H, Obidzinski K, Gunarso P. Policy and institutional frameworks for the development of palm oil-based biodiesel in Indonesia. CIFOR. 2011;1–40.
- [5] Lee JSH, Abood S, Ghazoul J, Barus B, Obidzinski K, Koh LP. Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conserv Lett. 2014;7(1):25–33. doi: 10.1111/conl.12039
- [6] Obidzinski K, Andriani R, Komarudin H, Andrianto A. Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. 2012. doi: 10.5751/ES-04775-170125
- [7] Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012
- [8] Havlík P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Böttcher H, Fritz S, Skalský R, et al. Global land-use implications of first and second-generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy. 2011;39(10):5690–702. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.030
- [9] Alwarritzi W, Nanseki T, Chomei Y. Analysis of the factors influencing the technical efficiency among oil palm smallholder farmers in Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015;28:630–8. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.074
- [10] Papilo P, Marimin, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS. Sustainability index assessment of palm oil-based bioenergy in Indonesia. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:808–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.072
- [11] Popp J, Lakner Z, Harangi-Rákos M, Fári M. The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056
- [12] Meyer MA, Priess JA. Indicators of bioenergy-related certification schemes - An analysis of the quality and comprehensiveness for assessing local/regional environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;65:151–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.041
- [13] Fritsche UR, Iriarte L. Sustainability criteria and indicators for the bio-based economy in Europe: State of discussion and way forward. Energies (Basel). 2014;7(11):6825–36. doi: 10.3390/en7116825
- [14] Lee JSH, Garcia-Ulloa J, Koh LP. Impacts of biofuel expansion in biodiversity hotspots. In: Biodiversity Hotspots. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. p. 277–93. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_15
- [15] Janaun J, Ellis N. Perspectives on biodiesel as a sustainable fuel. 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.12.011
- [16] Gosens J, Lu Y, He G, Bluemling B, Beckers TAM. Sustainability effects of household-scale biogas in rural China. Energy Policy. 2013;54:273–87. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.032
- [17] Kemausuor F, Bolwig S, Miller S. Modelling the socio-economic impacts of modern bioenergy in rural communities in Ghana. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2016;14:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.007
- [18] Papilo P, Marimin, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS. Palm oil-based bioenergy sustainability and policy in Indonesia and Malaysia: A systematic review and future agendas. Heliyon. 2022;8(10). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10919
- [19] Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP. Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation. J Clean Prod. 2006;14(18):1593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.021
- [20] Wichaisri S, Sopadang A. Sustainable supply chain performance measurement: A case study of the sugar industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operation Management. IEOM Society International; 2017.
Year 2025,
Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 12 - 22
Afdhol Rinaldi
Nasrullah Djamil
Nazruddin Safaat Harahap
,
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Nadia Sandi Putri
References
- [1] BPS. Riau Dalam Angka Tahun 2019. 2019.
- [2] PLN. Statistik PLN Tahun 2020. 2020.
- [3] PTPN-5. PTPN 5 Targets Four Biogas Generators in 2021 [Internet]. https://ptpn5.com/
- [4] Caroko W, Komarudin H, Obidzinski K, Gunarso P. Policy and institutional frameworks for the development of palm oil-based biodiesel in Indonesia. CIFOR. 2011;1–40.
- [5] Lee JSH, Abood S, Ghazoul J, Barus B, Obidzinski K, Koh LP. Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conserv Lett. 2014;7(1):25–33. doi: 10.1111/conl.12039
- [6] Obidzinski K, Andriani R, Komarudin H, Andrianto A. Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. 2012. doi: 10.5751/ES-04775-170125
- [7] Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl CA, Donald PF, et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012
- [8] Havlík P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Böttcher H, Fritz S, Skalský R, et al. Global land-use implications of first and second-generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy. 2011;39(10):5690–702. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.030
- [9] Alwarritzi W, Nanseki T, Chomei Y. Analysis of the factors influencing the technical efficiency among oil palm smallholder farmers in Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015;28:630–8. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.074
- [10] Papilo P, Marimin, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS. Sustainability index assessment of palm oil-based bioenergy in Indonesia. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:808–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.072
- [11] Popp J, Lakner Z, Harangi-Rákos M, Fári M. The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056
- [12] Meyer MA, Priess JA. Indicators of bioenergy-related certification schemes - An analysis of the quality and comprehensiveness for assessing local/regional environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;65:151–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.041
- [13] Fritsche UR, Iriarte L. Sustainability criteria and indicators for the bio-based economy in Europe: State of discussion and way forward. Energies (Basel). 2014;7(11):6825–36. doi: 10.3390/en7116825
- [14] Lee JSH, Garcia-Ulloa J, Koh LP. Impacts of biofuel expansion in biodiversity hotspots. In: Biodiversity Hotspots. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. p. 277–93. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_15
- [15] Janaun J, Ellis N. Perspectives on biodiesel as a sustainable fuel. 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.12.011
- [16] Gosens J, Lu Y, He G, Bluemling B, Beckers TAM. Sustainability effects of household-scale biogas in rural China. Energy Policy. 2013;54:273–87. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.032
- [17] Kemausuor F, Bolwig S, Miller S. Modelling the socio-economic impacts of modern bioenergy in rural communities in Ghana. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2016;14:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.007
- [18] Papilo P, Marimin, Hambali E, Sitanggang IS. Palm oil-based bioenergy sustainability and policy in Indonesia and Malaysia: A systematic review and future agendas. Heliyon. 2022;8(10). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10919
- [19] Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP. Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation. J Clean Prod. 2006;14(18):1593–602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.021
- [20] Wichaisri S, Sopadang A. Sustainable supply chain performance measurement: A case study of the sugar industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operation Management. IEOM Society International; 2017.