STUDY OF BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DENTAL IMPLANTS

Abstract

Dental implantology that become a predictable and highly acceptable treatment modality for the restoration of the human dental and oral apparatus, has need not even for a series of surgical, prosthetics and periodontal skills of the dentists, but also synthetic substance for tissue replacements that combine different design and materials concepts for surgical implants. Our aim was to study implant biomaterials that, for optimal performance, should have suitable mechanical strength and biocompatibility, that induce predictable, control-guided and rapid healing of the interfacial tissues both hard and soft.

Keywords

• -

STUDY OF BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DENTAL IMPLANTS

Abstract

Dental implantology that become a predictable and highly acceptable treatment modality for the restoration of the human dental and oral apparatus, has need not even for a series of surgical, prosthetics and periodontal skills of the dentists, but also synthetic substance for tissue replacements that combine different design and materials concepts for surgical implants. Our aim was to study implant biomaterials that, for optimal performance, should have suitable mechanical strength and biocompatibility, that induce predictable, control-guided and rapid healing of the interfacial tissues both hard and soft.

Keywords

• Biocompatibility
• Bioinert materials
• Bioactive materials
• Modulus of elasticity
• Corrosion
• Tissue response

References

1. Binnon P.P. (2000)Implantsand components: entering
2. the new millennium,Int.J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15(1):76-95
3. Curtis R., Watson T., (2008) Dental Biomaterials. Imaging, testing and modeling, Woodhead Publishing and Maney Publishing on behalf of The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Minning, Cambridge, England, ISBN 978-1-84569-296-4
4. Lang N.P., Karring T., Lindhe J., (1990), Proceeding of the 3rdWorkshop on Periodontology: Implant Dentistry, Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc
5. Matsushite Y., et al., (1990), Triodimensional FEM analysis of hydroxiapatite implants: diameter effect on stress distribution, J.Oral Implantol., 16(1):6:11
6. Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath GS, Tripathi S., Dikshit S., Divy MS, Biomaterials for Dental Implants: An
7. Implantology and Clinical Researc, January-April 2011;2(1):13-24 Journal
8. OfOral Naert L., et al., (1992), A study of 59 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses Part II, 68(6):949-56

9. Palacci P., Ericsson I., Engstrand P., Rangert B., (1995), Optimal Implant Positioning and Soft Tissue Management for the Branemark System, Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc
10. Spriano S., Bosetti M., Brenzoni M., Verne E., Maine G., Bergo V., Cannas M., (2005), Surface properties and cellresponse of low metal ion release Ti-6Al-Nb alloy after multi-step chemical and thermal treatments, Biomaterials 25 (11):1219-1229 Tanimoto
11. Matinlinna,Osamu Komiyama, Masaru Yamaguchi, Advanced Biomaterials and Technologies in Implantology, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, International Journal of Biomaterials, Volume 2012, Article ID 302825, 2 pages: 10,1155/2012/302825
12. Williams Df, Ed., (1987), Definitions in Biomaterials, Proceeding of a Consesus Conference of the European Society for Biomaterials, Chester, UK, March 3-5 1986, Elsevier, The Netherlands