EĞİTİM KURUMLARINDA DOĞAL KAYNAKLAR VE ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ; ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2021, , 1121 - 1129, 20.12.2021

Kadir Doğanşahin , Kazım Onur Demirarslan

https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.959518

Abstract

10 Mart 2020 tarihinde Türkiye'de üniversitelerde örgün eğitime COVID19 önlemleri kapsamında ara verilmiştir. Bu çalışmada pandemi döneminin eğitim kurumlarında doğal kaynaklar ve elektrik tüketimi üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada elektrik, su ve kömür tüketimleri ele alınmıştır. Pandemi sürecinde, örgün eğitime ara verildiğinde ve kampüslerde öğrenci bulunmadığında gerçekleşen tüketim, kurumun temel tüketim değerleri olarak değerlendirildiğinde, pandemi öncesi tüketim değerleri ile pandemi dönemi arasındaki fark yorumlanabilir. örgün eğitim faaliyetleri sonucunda gerçekleşen tüketim olarak Bu tüketim farkı kayıtlı öğrenci sayısına bölünerek öğrenci başına tüketim değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Bu değerler bilimsel olarak kesin olmasa da ilerleyen dönemlerde değişen öğrenci sayılarına göre yaklaşık tüketim tahminleri yapmak açısından faydalı bilgiler vermektedir. Yapılan çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar, örgün eğitimde öğrenci başına düşen doğal kaynaklar ve elektrik tüketimi hakkında fikir vermekte ve ele alınan dönemlere ait veriler kullanılarak farklı kurumlarda tüketimin izlenmesine yönelik bir yaklaşım önermektedir.

Keywords

COVİD19 Salgını, Doğal kaynaklar, Eğitim kurumları, Elektrik enerjisi, Sera gazları.

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; ARTVIN ÇORUH UNIVERSITY CASE

Abstract

On March 10, 2020, formal education at universities in Turkey has been suspended by the scope of COVID19 measures. In this study, the effects of the pandemic period on natural resources and electricity consumption in educational institutions have been examined. In this study, the consumption of electricity, water, and coal consumptions are discussed. When the realized consumption during the pandemic, when formal education is suspended, and there is no student presence in the campuses, is evaluated as the base consumption values of the institution, the difference between the consumption values before the pandemic and the pandemic period can be interpreted as the consumption realized as a result of formal education activities. Consumption values per student have been calculated by dividing this consumption difference by the number of registered students. Although these values are not scientifically precise, they provide useful information in terms of making approximate consumption estimates according to the changing number of students in the upcoming semesters. The results obtained in the conducted study give an idea about the natural resources and electricity consumption per student in formal education and suggest an approach towards consumption monitoring in different institutions through the use of data from the considered periods.

Keywords

COVID19 Pandemic, Natural Sources, Educational institutions, Electric Energy, Greenhouse gases

References

• Ayres, R.U. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. 2005. A Theory of Economic Growth with Material/Energy Resources and Dematerialization: Interaction of Three Growth Mechanisms, Ecological Economics, 55, 96-118.
• Bernard, L. 2020. BP statistical review of world energy 2020,https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf, (05.05.2021).
• Brown to Green 2019. Berlin: Climate Transparency, 2019. https://www.climate-transparency.org/g20-climate-performance/g20report2019, (05.05.2021).
• Ekins, P. Hughes, N. Brigenzu, S. Arden Clark, C. Fischer-Kowalski, M. Graedel, T. Hajer, M. Hashimoto, S. et al. 2016. Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications. Report of the International Resource Panel, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Paris, https://www.resourcepanel.org/sites/default/files/documents/document/media/resour(05.05.2021)ce_efficiency_report_march_2017_web_res.pdf, (05.05.2021).
• EPA 2016, U.S. EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance Direct Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production /files/2016-03/documents/stationaryemission s_3_2016.pdf (27.05.2021).
• Global Status Report 2017. UN Environment, https://www.worldgbc.org/sites/default/files/UNEP%20188_GABC_en%20%28web%29.pdf, (05.05.2021).
• Islam, A. Khan, F. Imtiaz, S. and Ahmed, S. 2020. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries How can process safety and a risk management approach guide pandemic risk management ? J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 68, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104310.
• Mizrak, B. and Nur, E. 2021. The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey : A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 34, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.022.
• Muhammed, A. Karataş, K. 2020. Psychological Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Society and Its Reflections on Education. Turkish Stud. 15, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44336.
• OECD, 2008. Natural Resources of Natural Resources of. Nat. Resour. Pro-Poor Growth Econ. Polit. OECD, 29–33,https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/natural-resources-and-pro-poor-growth_9789264060258-en?_ga=2.242112577.257257097.1624964232-1010423968.1624964232#page3, (05.05.2021).
• Oyedepo, S.O. Leramo, R.O. Adekeye, T. Kilanko, O. Babalola, O.P. Balogun, A.O. Akhibi, M.O. 2015. A Study on Energy Demand and Consumption in Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria. Int. Conf. African Dev. Issues, 203–211.
• Yılmaz İnce, E. Kabul, A. and Diler, İ. 2020. Distance education in higher education in the COVID-19 pandemic process: A case of Isparta Applied Sciences University. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 343-351.
• Zaharia, C., Suteu, D., 2011. The Natural Resources and Sustainable Development. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, XLIV, 1(145), 93–101.