Covid-19 effects on distance education in higher education: A comparison with bibliometric analysis before Covid-19 pandemic and the Covid-19 pandemic periods

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic, which emerged in the last months of 2019, spread rapidly and has affected the whole world. The pandemic also affected higher education significantly, and face-to-face education in higher education institutions were suspended. Most universities have changed the teaching method from traditional to online education. Thus, more and more researchers focused on COVID-19 and distance education in higher education. The aim of the research was to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on higher education studies in the field of distance education. For this reason, the changes in distance education research in the pre-pandemic and the pandemic period were analyzed in terms of some performance variables. Two different meta-data sets, consisting of 1322 articles for the pre-COVID-19 period and 2103 for the COVID-19 period, obtained by querying the Web of Science database, were used for analysis. Vosviewer software were used for bibliometric analysis, while Harzing’s Publish or Perish software was used for h-index calculation. Publications from the two different periods were compared according to researcher(s), publication, journal, institution, and country criteria using citation analysis. The citation analysis showed that the most cited researchers of the pre-pandemic period were A.Bozkurt, B. Rienties, and D. U. Bolliger, while the most cited researchers of the post-pandemic period were C. Herodotou, J. C. Bonk and M.Y. Doo. Computer & Education ranked among the most-cited journal in the pre-pandemic period, while in the post-pandemic period, the most cited journal was Education and Information Technologies The most cited studies in the pre-pandemic period were conducted by researchers working at King Saud University and the University of South Africa, while in the post-pandemic period Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and Indiana University were in the leading position. The results clearly show that Covid-19 has given a new direction to distance education.

Keywords

• Higher Education
• Distance Education
• COVID-19
• Pandemic

References

1. Amoozegar, A., Khodabandelou, R., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2018). Major Trends in Distance Education Research: A Combination of Bibliometric and Thematic Analyze. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 5(2), 5352-5359. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3173980.
2. Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: a multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34(4), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.12.002 .
3. Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması [The coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic process and evaluations on education in the post-pandemic world: New normal and new education paradigm]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 112-142. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1215818
4. Clarivate Analytics. (2020). Journal Citation Reports. https://jcr.clarivate.com/
5. Demirbilek, Y., Pehlivantürk, G., Özgüler, Z. Ö., & Alp Meşe, E. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 50(SI-1), 489-494. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-187 .
6. El Mohadab, M., Bouikhalene, B., & Safi, S. (2020). Bibliometric method for mapping the state of the art of scientific production in Covid-19. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139, 110052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110052 .
7. Goktas, Y., Arpacik, O., Kucuk, S., Yildirim, G., Aydemir, M., Reisoğlu, İ., & Telli, E. (2012). Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 191-196. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978439.pdf .
8. Google Scholar (2021). Google Scholar Metrics. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=tr&vq=eng_educationaltechnology

9. Gurcan, F., Ozyurt, O., & Cagitay, N. E. (2021). Investigation of Emerging Trends in the E-Learning Field Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5358 .
10. Harzing, A. W. (2016). Publish or Perish. Harzing.com Research in International Management. Retrieved from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish .
11. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B. Trust, T.& Bond, A. (2021) The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
12. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—article, author, or journal?. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159868 .
13. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—article, author, or journal?. Academy of management journal, 50(3), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159868 .
14. Karaköse, T., & Demirkol, M. (2021). Exploring the emerging COVID-19 research trends and current status in the field of education: a bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(2), 7-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.102.1 .
15. Laato, S., Islam, A. N., Farooq, A., & Dhir, A. (2020). Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102224 .
16. Martí‐Parreño, J., Méndez‐Ibáñez, E., & Alonso‐Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: a bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of computer assisted learning, 32(6), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161 .
17. Mashroofa, M. M., Jusoh, M., & Chinna, K. (2019). Research trend on the application of “E-Learning Adoption Theory”: A scientometric study during 2000-2019, based on Web of Science and SCOPUS. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 13(2), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2020.1729072.
18. Open University. (2021). https://www.open.ac.uk/
19. Park, H., & Shea, P. (2020). A review of ten-year research through co-citation analysis: Online learning, distance learning, and blended learning. Online Learning, 24(2), 225–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2001.
20. Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161 .
21. Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M., & Dündar, H. (2014). Tendencies of the Researches Published in Education and Science Journal: Content Analysis. Egitim ve Bilim, 39, 428-449. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/3278 .
22. Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
23. Talwar, M., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., Tripathy, N., & Dhir, A. (2021). Has financial attitude impacted the trading activity of retail investors during the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102341
24. UNESCO (2020). Guidance on Open Educational Practices during School Closures: Utilizing OER under COVID-19 Pandemic in line with UNESCO OER Recommendation. https://educacion.udd.cl/aprendizaje180/files/2020/12/UNESCO-IITE-Guidance-on-Open-Educational-Practices-during-School-Closures-2020.pdf .
25. Yavuz, M., Kayalı, B., & Tutal, Ö. (2021). Trend of distance education research in the covid-19 period: A bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(2), 256-279. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.922682 .
26. Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E. M. ve Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741.