Research Article

Comparison of the anxiety levels of teacher candidates during actual and 360° video virtual reality presentations

Volume: 5 Number: 4 December 10, 2022
EN

Comparison of the anxiety levels of teacher candidates during actual and 360° video virtual reality presentations

Abstract

This study considers if the 360° video Virtual Reality (VR) environment is a less stressful alternative to giving actual presentations, and thus better able to support the development of the presentation skills of teacher candidates. Mixed method research was conducted in which 12 teacher candidates gave an average of 5 minutes of presentations on different days, both in a virtual and in a face-to-face school environment, before a group of listeners whom they hadn’t seen before. The candidates’ pulses were compared during presentations conducted in both environments, and the audio recordings were analysed with the PRAAT program. Further evaluation was conducted at the end of the process using an opinion form and interviews. No significant differences were found between the two groups, except in 2 of the 9 different voice analysis variables related to anxiety and the pulse of the candidates. The candidates generally felt that the 360° video VR experience was quite realistic, and that it could be an effective method of addressing concerns about giving presentations. It was therefore concluded that 360° video VR environments could be effectively used in teacher education as an alternative to the actual presentation experience.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, P. L., Price, M., Edwards, S. M., Obasaju, M. A., Schmertz, S. K., Zimand, E., & Calamaras, M. R. (2013). Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Sychology, 81(5), 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033559
  2. Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., & Kaufman, J. (2022). Are we ready for virtual reality in K-12 classrooms?. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2033307
  3. Arbit, B., & Leibzon, R. (2020). Wearable devices in arrhythmia detection. Proceedings of UCLA Health, 24, 1-2.
  4. Billingsley, G., Smith, S., Smith, S., & Meritt, J. (2019). A systematic literature review of using immersive virtual reality technology in teacher education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(1), 65-90.
  5. Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903443849
  6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.1.05. http://www.praat.org./
  7. Brenner, M., & Shipp, T. (1988). Voice stress analysis, in Proceedings of the NASA Technical Report, Williamsburg, VA.
  8. Brinia, V., & Psoni, P. (2021). Online teaching practicum during COVID-19: The case of a teacher education program in Greece. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 610-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2020-0223

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 10, 2022

Submission Date

August 18, 2022

Acceptance Date

October 24, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 4

APA
Atal, D., & Kızılışıkoğlu, G. (2022). Comparison of the anxiety levels of teacher candidates during actual and 360° video virtual reality presentations. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 981-999. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1164117

Cited By