The human face of innovative teaching: EFL teachers’ emotional vulnerability in AI-assisted teaching through the lens of Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

This narrative inquiry explored the emotional vulnerability experienced by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers in the context of AI-assisted teaching, informed by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The narratives and interviews of twenty-one EFL teachers were analyzed, focusing on their accounts of emotional vulnerability as they integrated AI into their teaching practices. Specifically, the analysis examined positive emotional vulnerability, characterized by openness to risks and challenges in a supportive AI-assisted teaching environment, and negative emotional vulnerability, defined by distress arising from AI implementation challenges in anxiety-provoking teaching contexts. A deductive thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes related to emotional vulnerability and TAM constructs. Findings revealed that EFL. Findings revealed that teachers’ perceived usefulness of AI technologies significantly contributes to their willingness to take risks in implementing AI in their classrooms. Moreover, it was shown that EFL teachers’ self-disclosure in safe working environments facilitates the quality of their AI integration and contributes to their perceived ease of use. In contrast, their negative vulnerability is characterized by a sense of powerlessness when encountering AI and a tendency to withdraw. It was concluded that EFL teachers’ acceptance of technology plays a crucial role in shaping their openness to the challenges associated with AI implementation, particularly by addressing their emotional vulnerabilities. This study has implications for EFL teacher education programs, which should address teachers’ technology acceptance to foster greater willingness to embrace the challenges of AI integration and ultimately enhance positive vulnerability.

Keywords

• AI-assisted teaching
• EFL teacher
• Emotional vulnerability
• Technology Acceptance Model

References

1. Al-Awidi, H. M., & Aldhafeeri, F. M. (2017). Teachers’ readiness to implement digital curriculum in Kuwaiti schools. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.28945/3685
2. Acquah, B. Y. S., Arthur, F., Salifu, I., Quayson, E., & Nortey, S. A. (2024). Preservice teachers’ behavioural intention to use artificial intelligence in lesson planning: A dual staged PLS SEM ANN approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100307.
3. Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.261888
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press.
6. Chen, J., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Teachers’ coping strategies and emotional well-being in digital learning environments. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104149
7. Chiu, T. K. F., Lim, C. P., & Wang, Q. (2023). Artificial intelligence in second language learning: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1235–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10154-2
8. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.

9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
10. Edmond, N., & Kennedy, J. (2017). Integrated practice in education and social work: Interprofessional learning and practice development. SAGE Publications.
11. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
12. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
13. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
14. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149
15. Hsu, L. (2016). The acceptance of technology among EFL teachers: Exploring anxiety, workload, and job satisfaction. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0288-2
16. Jang, J. (2024). Exploring emotional vulnerability and sense of agency in the digital realm: A three-year case study of an EFL teacher in South Korea. Education Sciences, 14(9), 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090950
17. Joshi, S., Pandey, K., & Maheta, D. (2025). The role of perceived trust and technology anxiety in intention to use technology tools in HEI: Applying the modified UTAUT from user behavior context. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2597051
18. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
19. Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerability, and reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.009
20. Khoo, W. C., & Jamaludin, K. (2025). Understanding school teachers’ acceptance of AI in education: Insights from the technology acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i3/25196
21. Klykken, A. (2021). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
22. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023).ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
23. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
24. Kuran, K., Aktas, F., & Dolker, M. (2020). Ethical issues in qualitative research: A case study on semi-structured interviews. International Journal of Social Research, 13(2), 45–58.
25. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency, and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
26. Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
27. Lin, X., Wang, Y., & Xing, W. (2024). The mediating role of technology acceptance and moderating role of emotion regulation in faculty’s online professional development. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.906
28. Liu, Y., Gong, S., Zhang, H., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2022). Teachers’ occupational stress and burnout in the digital age: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 866859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866859
29. Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers’ perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: The importance of the academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
30. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
31. Oh, S.-Y., & Ahn, Y. (2024). Exploring teachers’ perception of artificial intelligence: The socio-emotional deficiency as opportunities and challenges in human-AI complementarity in K–12 education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.13065
32. Papadakis, S., Striuk, A. M., Kravtsov, H. M., Shyshkina, M. P., Marienko, M. V., & Danylchuk, H. B. (2024). Embracing digital innovation and cloud technologies for transformative learning experiences. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (CTE 2023). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org
33. Papadakis, S., Lytvynova, S. H., Ivanova, S. M., & Selyshcheva, I. A. (2024). Advancing lifelong learning with AI enhanced ICT: A review of 3L Person 2024. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Professional Retraining and Life Long Learning Using ICT: Person Oriented Approach (3L Person 2024). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org
34. Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2023). Understanding teacher acceptance of AI in education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(4), 1022–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13324
35. Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: An ongoing and continuous journey. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563–566. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1070
36. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE Publications.
37. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta analytic structural equation modeling approach explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
38. Shen, L., Qiu, N., & Wang, Z. (2025). Psychological safety and trust as drivers of teachers’ continued use of AI tools in classrooms. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 12345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13789-4
39. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
40. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
41. Valiao, A. (2025). Technostress and its impact on the job performance of teachers. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0692
42. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
43. Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Tømte, C., Wasson, B., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). What explains teachers’ trust of AI in education across six countries? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.01627
44. Xu, L., Liu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2024). Language teachers’ emotions in online classrooms: Relations among teachers’ appraisals of classroom events, emotional responses, and instructional practices. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00301-0
45. Zawacki Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
47. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7