Research Article

Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization

Volume: 9 Number: 3 September 30, 2026
EN

Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization

Abstract

Adaptive gamification has emerged as a prominent strategy for addressing engagement and motivation challenges in higher education and distance learning. Recent research has increasingly framed adaptivity as a run-time, algorithmic process driven by artificial intelligence and learning analytics. While such systems offer computational efficiency, they frequently reduce adaptivity to parameter optimization within fixed instructional structures, resulting in limited transparency and superficial personalization. This article argues that adaptive gamification should be reconceptualized as a design-time pedagogical architecture rather than a reactive algorithmic feature. Drawing on a conceptual synthesis of adaptive gamification literature, the study distinguishes between the temporal locus of adaptivity (run-time versus design-time) and the scope of adaptation (element-level versus scenario-level), foregrounding a structural imbalance: adaptation has been elaborated almost entirely at the element level, while scenario-level alternatives remain largely untheorized. Grounded in self-determination theory and informed by systemic gamification theory, the article proposes scenario-level design-time adaptive gamification as a coherent alternative that foregrounds learner agency, pedagogical transparency, and instructional integrity. By embedding adaptivity into pre-authored pedagogically equivalent scenarios, this approach accommodates motivational diversity while preserving assessment equivalence. The study concludes by positioning adaptivity as a pedagogical responsibility rather than a purely technical capability.

Keywords

References

  1. Alalgawi, D., & Sadkhan, S. B. (2022). Adapt gamification to learners' preferences. 2022 Fifth College of Science International Conference of Recent Trends in Information Technology (CSCTIT), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCTIT56299.2022.10145630
  2. Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., & Specht, M. (2019). The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032
  3. Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19–33.
  4. Benkhalfallah, F., Laouar, M. R., & Benkhalfallah, M. S. (2024). Examining adaptive e-learning approaches to enhance learning and individual experiences. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 13(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.240
  5. Bennani, S., Maalel, A., & Ben Ghezala, H. (2022). Adaptive gamification in e-learning: A literature review and future challenges. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22477
  6. Böckle, M., Micheel, I., Bick, M., & Novak, J. (2018). A design framework for adaptive gamification applications. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1227–1236). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.151
  7. Bozkurt, A., & Durak, G. (2018). A systematic review of gamification research: In pursuit of Homo Ludens. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 8(3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2018070102
  8. Brandl, L. C., & Schrader, A. (2024). Student player types in higher education: Trial and clustering analyses. Education Sciences, 14(4), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040352

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Instructional Design, Instructional Technologies, Educational Technology and Computing

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2026

Submission Date

March 24, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 5, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Uzun, S. (2026). Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 9(3), 410-432. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1915276
AMA
1.Uzun S. Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization. JETOL. 2026;9(3):410-432. doi:10.31681/jetol.1915276
Chicago
Uzun, Sercan. 2026. “Reclaiming Pedagogical Architecture in Adaptive Gamification: Design-Time Scenario-Level Adaptivity Beyond Algorithmic Personalization”. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 9 (3): 410-32. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1915276.
EndNote
Uzun S (September 1, 2026) Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 9 3 410–432.
IEEE
[1]S. Uzun, “Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization”, JETOL, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 410–432, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.31681/jetol.1915276.
ISNAD
Uzun, Sercan. “Reclaiming Pedagogical Architecture in Adaptive Gamification: Design-Time Scenario-Level Adaptivity Beyond Algorithmic Personalization”. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 9/3 (September 1, 2026): 410-432. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1915276.
JAMA
1.Uzun S. Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization. JETOL. 2026;9:410–432.
MLA
Uzun, Sercan. “Reclaiming Pedagogical Architecture in Adaptive Gamification: Design-Time Scenario-Level Adaptivity Beyond Algorithmic Personalization”. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, vol. 9, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 410-32, doi:10.31681/jetol.1915276.
Vancouver
1.Sercan Uzun. Reclaiming pedagogical architecture in adaptive gamification: Design-time scenario-level adaptivity beyond algorithmic personalization. JETOL. 2026 Sep. 1;9(3):410-32. doi:10.31681/jetol.1915276