Developing design principles for 3D tactile books for visually impaired students: A design and development research approach

Abstract

This study addresses the limited availability of standardized and pedagogically grounded tactile learning materials for students with visual impairments by focusing on the design of 3D tactile books. The purpose is to develop evidence-based design principles through a design and development research approach. A mixed-method, iterative methodology was employed, structured around the ADDIE model and involving analysis, design, development, and evaluation phases. The study group consisted of teachers of visually impaired students and field experts selected through purposive sampling across different phases. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions and analyzed through content analysis. Findings indicate that effective 3D tactile books should integrate multisensory elements, ensure durability and usability, align with learner characteristics, and support independent and collaborative learning. The developed prototype, refined through iterative cycles, demonstrated strong usability, motivational impact, and cognitive support potential. The study concludes by proposing comprehensive design principles to guide future development of accessible, scalable, and instructionally effective tactile learning materials.

Keywords

• 3D tactile books
• visual impairment education
• multisensory learning

References

1. American Foundation for the Blind. (2020). What is visual impairment? https://www.afb.org/blindness-and-low-vision/what-is-blindness.
2. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813.
3. Anđić, B., Lavicza, Z., Ulbrich, E., Cvjetićanin, S., Petrović, F., & Maričić, M. (2024). Contribution of 3D modelling and printing to learning in primary schools: A case study with visually impaired students from an inclusive biology classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 58(4), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2118352
4. Ataman, A. (2003). Görme yetersizliğinin çocuklar üzerindeki etkileri. In Ü. Tüfekçioğlu (Ed.), İşitme konuşma ve görme sorunu olan çocukların eğitimi (ss. 235–256). Anadolu Üniversitesi.
5. Archambault, D., Negrerie, S., and Blain, S. (2022). Design of augmented tactile books for blind children. The Journal on Technology and Persons witht Disabilities, 10, 219-231.
6. Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). (2024). CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org.
7. Cavkaytar, A., & Diken, İ. H. (2012). Özel eğitim: Özel eğitim ve özel eğitim gerektirenler (1. bs.). Vize Basın Yayın.
8. Coşkunserçe, O. (2025). The use of 3D-printed instructional materials in active learning activities within science lessons. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 8(3), 351-367.

9. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Çağıltay, K., & Göktaş, Y. (Eds.). (2013). Öğretim teknolojilerinin temelleri: Teoriler, araştırmalar, eğilimler. Pegem Akademi.
11. Dzhurynskyi, Y., Mayik, V., & Mayik, L. (2024). Enhancing Accessibility: Automated Tactile Graphics Generation for Individuals with Visual Impairments. Computation, 12(12), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation12120251.
12. Esplendori G.F., Kobayashi R.M., & Püschel V.A.A. (2022). Multisensory integration approach, cognitive domains, meaningful learning: reflections for undergraduate nursing education. Journal of School of Nursing – University of São Paulo, 56, e20210381. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0381.
13. Göksu, V., & Çevik, M. (2004). Görme engelli öğrencilerin kavram öğrenme süreçleri. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15, 45–60.
14. Günbaş, N. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ approaches to designing technology-based activities in anchored instruction framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 5(2), 270-296.
15. Hatlen, P. (2010). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students. RE:view, 32(1), 25–32.
16. Heller, M. A., McCarthy, M., & Clark, A. (2005). Pattern perception and pictures for the blind. Psicologica, 26, 161–171.
17. Holloway, L., Butler, M., & Marriott, K. (2022). 3D printed street crossings: Supporting orientation and mobility training with people who are blind or have low vision. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502072.
18. Holloway, L., Butler, M., & Marriott, K. (2023). TactIcons: Designing 3D printed map icons for people who are blind or have low vision. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581359.
19. Jones, K., & Mendez, J. D. (2021). Enhancing learning with 3D print technology: A case study of problem based learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1774735.
20. Kelly, S.M. & Smith, D.W. (2011). The Impact of Assistive Technology on the Educational Performance of Students with Visual Impairments: A Synthesis of the Research. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(2), 73-83. Retrieved May 6, 2026 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/109821/.
21. Lahav, O., & Mioduser, D. (2008). Haptic-feedback support for cognitive mapping of unknown spaces by people who are blind. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.08.001.
22. Lozano, O. R. (2022). Prind3d, a service-learning project for improving visually impaired accessibility through educational 3D printing. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 12(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1324.
23. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Montusiewicz, J., Barszcz, M., & Korga, S. (2022). Cultural heritage models. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 11910.
25. Mukhiddinov, M., & Kim, S.-Y. (2021). A systematic literature review on the automatic creation of tactile graphics for the blind and visually impaired. Processes, 9(10), 1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101726.
26. Phutane, M., Wright, J., Castro, B. V., Shi, L., Stern, S. R., Lawson, H. M., & Azenkot, S. (2022). Tactile materials in practice: Understanding the experiences of teachers of the visually impaired. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 15(3), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508364.
27. Putri, P. & Sofyan, H. (2020). A simulation-based interactive learning multimedia development for photosynthesis and respiration practicum in junior high schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 3(3), 311-339.
28. Ramadan, D. (2019). Transadaptation and prototyping of an audio-tactile book for blind children (Doctoral dissertation). Hamad Bin Khalifa University.
29. Raynal, M., Ducasse, J., Macé, M. J.-M., Oriola, B., & Jouffrais, C. (2024). The FlexiBoard: Tangible and tactile graphics for people with vision impairments. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(3), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8030017.
30. Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). Routledge.
31. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473.
32. Sargsyan, E., Oriola, B., Macé, M. J.-M., Serrano, M., & Jouffrais, C. (2023). 3D printed interactive multi-storey model for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581304.
33. Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006.
34. Stangl, A., Kim, J., & Yeh, T. (2014). 3D printed tactile picture books for children with visual impairments: A design probe. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 321–324).
35. Tekgül, E. (2024). Views on distance education visually impaired students receiving professional music education. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 7(3), 346-357.
36. Tusitala. (2024). 3D-printed tactile storybooks: Creating books for visually impaired children. Tusitala Blog. https://tusitala.sg/3d-printed-tactile-storybooks/.
37. Valente, D., Chennaz, L., Archambault, D., Négrerie, S., Blain, S., Galiano, A. R., & Gentaz, E. (2024). Comprehension of a multimodal book by children with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 42(1), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231172071.
38. Wang, F., and Hannafin, M.J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682.
39. Yazıcı, F., & Sözbilir, M. (2020). 6. sınıf görme engelli öğrencilere solunum sistemi kavramlarının öğretimi. Erciyes Journal of Education, 4(2), 68–97.
40. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. bs.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
41. Zorluoğlu, S., & Sözbilir, M. (2017). Birbiri içinde çözünmeyen sıvılarda yoğunluk kavramının görme yetersizliğinden etkilenen öğrencilere öğretimi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 13(2), 211–231.