A Sımulatıon-Based Interactive Learning Multimedia Development for Photosynthesıs and Respıratıon Practicum in Junior High Schools

Abstract

A practicum is beneficial in science learning to provide a concrete manifestation of a topic. This study aimed at creating a simulation-based interactive learning multimedia product to assist students’ practicum. The product was developed for the topic of cell metabolism process focusing on the energy in living systems. The study employed the Research and Development referring to the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model. During the development process, both product testing and users’ response testing were carried out. To reveal the product impact, students’ results of the pre-test and post-test were analyzed. The product was developed by using Macromedia Flash 8. The results of Alpha and Beta analysis showed that the results are ‘feasible’ and ‘very feasible’ for the product. Furthermore, based on the average value of 39.2 for the initial test and 82.5 for the final test it was obtained an N-gain value of 0.712 with the category of "High". Therefore, it proved that the developed interactive learning multimedia is effective in increasing students' analytical skills for the Science Learning materials in junior high schools.

Keywords

• ADDIE
• Analytical Skills
• Cell metabolism
• Interactive multimedia
• Science Learning

References

1. Abdorrakhman, Gintings. (2008). Esensi praktis belajar & pembelajaran. Bandung: Humaniora.
2. Altun, E., Baris. D., Burk. Alev. A., Ilker. C. (2009). Developing an interactive virtual chemistry laboratory enrich with constructivist learning activities for secondary school: Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 1.
3. Amer, A. (2005). Analytical thinking. Cairo: Cairo University.
4. Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing; a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.
5. Ariani, Niken & Dany, H. (2010). Pembelajaran multimedia di sekolah: pedoman pembelajaran interaktif, kontruktif, dan prospektif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
6. Ariesto, Sutopo. (2003). Multimedia interaktif dan flash. Yogyakarta: PT Graha Ilmu.
7. Arifah, Isnaeni. Maftukhin & Fatmaryanti, S.D. (2014). Pengembangan buku petunjuk praktikum berbasis guided inquiry untuk mengoptimalkan hands on mahasiswa semester II program studi pendidikan fisika universitas muhammadiyah purworejo tahun akademik 2013/2014. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 5 (1): 24-28.
8. Arsyad, Azhar. (2011). Media pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

9. Basri, Muhammad. (2012). Perancangan pembelajaran. Bandarlampung: Unila.
10. Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. Gall. (1989). Educational research: an introduction, fifth edition. New York: Longman.
11. Budiningsih, A. (2005). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
12. Campbell, N., Jane, B. Lawrence, G. (2002). Biologi: edisi kelima – jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
13. Crozat, S., Hu, O. & Trigano, P. (1999). A method for evaluating multimedia learning software. Florence: IEEE.
14. Darmawan, Deni. (2012). Teknologi pembelajaran edisi kedua. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
15. Darsana, I Wayan., I Wayan Sadia., dan I Nyoman Tika. (2014). Analisis Standar Kebutuhan Laboratorium Kimia dalam Implementsi Kurikulum 2013 Pada SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Bangli. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendiikan Ganesha, 4.
16. David, H., Robet Resnick. (1996). Fisika jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
17. Departemen Pendidikan Indonesia (2008). Kamus besar bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
18. Depdiknas . (2006). Permendiknas no 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
19. Deporter, B & Hernacki, M. (2002). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: KAIFA.
20. Erikson, H.E. (1963). Childhood and society. New York : W.W. Norton & Company Inc.
21. Fogarty, R. (1991). The mindful school: how to integrate the curricula. Palatine: Skylight Publishing.
22. Fogarty, Robin. (1991). How to integrated the curricula. Palatine, Ilinois; IRI/Skylight Publishing, Inc.
23. Gunawan, A. W. (2003). Genius learning strategy: petunjuk praktis untuk menerapkan accelerated learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
24. Heong, Y. M., et al. (2011). The level of marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students. International journal of social and humanity, 1 (2): 121-125.
25. Hotimah & Ali, M. (2017). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif IPA untuk meningkatkan pemahaman siswa pada materi mikroorganisme SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4 (2): 212.
26. Hurlock, Elizabeth B. (1980). Psikologi perkembangan: suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
27. Hurlock, Elizabeth B. (2002). Psikologi perkembangan: suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. Jakarta: Gramedia. Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA, US: EdITS Publishers.
28. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational Technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
29. Kemendiknas. (2011). Panduan pengembangan pembelajaran IPA secara terpadu. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
30. Khoirun Nisak, E.S. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA terpadu tipe connected pada materi pokok sistem ekskresi untuk kelas IX SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (Jps), 1 (1).
31. Krajcik, Joseph S. & Czerniak Charlene M. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: a project based approach. New York: Routledge.
32. Larasati, D.S., & M. Sukisno. (2014). Penggunaan media simulasi berbasis teknologi informasi dalam pembelajaran fisika pada siswa lintas minat di SMA Negeri 3 Pekalongan. Unnes Physics Eduction Journal, 3 (3): 50-51.
33. Leacock, T. L. & Nesbit, J. C. (2007). A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources. Educational technology & society, 10(2): 44-59.
34. Lewy, Zulkardi. & Nyimas Aisyah. (2009). Pengembangan soal untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pokok bahasan barisan dan deret bilangan di kelas IX akselerasi SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3 (2).
35. Montaku, Sudji., dkk. (2012). The model of analytical thinking skill training process. Research journal of applied science, 7 (1): 17-20.
36. Muhammad, Nur., dan Muslimin. (2007). Hakikat Sains. Yogyakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana UNY.
37. Mulyatiningsih, Endang. (2012). Metode penelitian terapan bidang pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
38. Muna, Izza A. (2016). Optimalisasi fungsi laboratorium IPA melalui kegiatan praktikum pada prodi PGMI jurusan tarbiyah STAIN Ponorogo. Kodifikasia, 10 (1).
39. Mutveia, A. & Mattssonb, J. (2014). Big ideas in science education in teacher training program. IOSTE BORNEO 2014. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, (167).
40. Nasution. (2005). Teknologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
41. Nesbit, J. C., Belfer, K. & Vargo, J. (2002). A convergent participation model for evaluation of learning objects. Canadian journal of learning and technology, 28(3): 105–120.
42. Nurkamilah, Siti. (2018). Penggunaan multimedia interaktif model simulasi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan analisis mahasiswa di IPI Garut. Jurnal PETIK, 4 (1).
43. Prastowo, Andi. (2014). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik. Jakarta: Kencana
44. Putra, Sitiavata. R., (2013). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakrta: Diva Press
45. Roblyer, M. & Doering, A.H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Boston: Pearson.
46. Rusman, Deni Kurniawan & Cepi R. (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
47. Sadiman, Arief, R. Rahardjo, A.H., & Rahardjito. (2011). Media pendidikan: pengertian, pengembangan, dan pemanfaatannya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
48. Sadiman, dkk. (2007). Media pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
49. Santrock, J.W. (2003). Adolescent – Perkembangan Remaja. Jakarta: Erlangga.
50. Sardiman, A. M. (2004). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
51. Seels, Barbara B. & Richey, Rita C. (1994). Teknologi pembelajaran: definisi dan kawasannya. Jakarta: Unit Percetakan Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
52. Silitonga, AS., Husin I. (2020). Buku ajar energi baaru dan terbarukan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
53. Siregar, et al. (2019). EFL teachers’ perceived challenges in implementing the 21st-century pedagogical competence: a case study. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research. (2) 6: 67-77.
54. Siregar, et al. (2020). The effective 21st-century pedagogical competence as perceived by pre-service english teachers. Pedagogy Journal of English Language Teaching, (8) 1: 1-12.
55. Slavin, R. (2006) Educational psychology; theory and practice (8th edition). Boston: Perason Education Inc.
56. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta.
57. Sunarto, Agung & Agung H. (2006). Perkembangan peserta didik. Jakarta: PT Asdi Mahasatya.
58. Sundayana, R. (2014). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Wacana Prima.
59. Surjono, Herman.D. (2017). Multimedia pembelajaran interaktif: konsep dan pengembangan, edisi pertama. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
60. Susilowati. (2014). IPA dan pembelajarannya. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
61. Sutopo, Ariesto Hadi. (2003). Multimedia interaktif dengan flash. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
62. Taopan, L. L., Drajati, N. A., & Sumardi. (2019). Discovering the teacher ’ s beliefs in TPACK framework for teaching English in high school. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 3(1).
63. Taopan, L. L., Drajati, N. A., & Sumardi. (2020). TPACK Framework: Challenges and Opportunıtıes ın EFL Classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3 (1)(January), 1–22. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/RILL%0ATPACK
64. Toharudin, Uus. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora
65. Trianto, (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
66. Wahono, Romi. S. (2006). Aspek dan kriteria penilaian media pembelajaran. [Online] diakses pada 20 Agustus 2019 dari https://romisatriawahono.net/2006/06/21/aspek-dan-kriteria-penilaian-media-pembelajaran/.
67. Warsita, Bambang. (2008). Teknologi pembelajaran (landasan dan aplikasinya). Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
68. Widodo, W., Fida, R., Siti, N. (2016). Ilmu pengetahuan alam: edisi revisi untuk SMP/ MTs kelas VII semester 1. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
69. Yaumi, M. & Hum, M. (2014). Prinsip-prinsip desain pembelajaran disesuaikan dengan kurikulum 2013, edisi kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group.
70. Young, Hugh D. (2002). Fisika universitas: jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
71. Yudhiantoro, Dhani. (2006). Membuat animasi web dengan macromedia flash professional 8. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.