Rekreasyonel erkek futbolcularda dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetmenin alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge ve çeviklik üzerine akut etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma; yalnız dinamik germe ile dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme yöntemlerinin alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge ve çeviklik üzerine akut etkilerini karşılaştırmak amacı ile gerçekleştirildi.

Yöntem: Çalışmaya 27 rekreasyonel erkek futbolcu (yaş 20,55±1,47 yıl; boy 174,70±4,42 cm; kilo 70,18±8,67 kg) dahil edildi. Çalışmanın birinci günü ilk 14 katılımcıya yalnız dinamik germe, son 13 katılımcıya dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme; çalışmanın ikinci günü ilk 14 katılımcıya dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme, son 13 katılımcıya ise yalnız dinamik germe uygulandı. Her iki günde de yöntemlerden önce ve sonra katılımcıların alt ekstremite sıcaklıkları termal kamera; esneklikleri otur-uzan; dengeleri Y denge ve çeviklikleri T testi ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Yalnız dinamik germenin alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik ve çevikliği; dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme yöntemlerinin ise alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge (anterior, postero-medial, postero-lateral) ve çevikliği artırdığı sonucuna ulaşıldı (p<0,05). Bununla birlikte dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme yöntemlerinin; alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge ve çevikliği arttırmada yalnız dinamik germe yöntemine göre üstünlüğü olmadığı sonucuna ulaşıldı (p>0,05).

Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonucunda yalnız dinamik germenin alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik ve çevikliği; dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme yöntemlerinin alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge ve çevikliği arttırdığı sonucuna ulaşıldı. Ayrıca dinamik germe ve miyofasyal gevşetme yöntemlerinin; alt ekstremite sıcaklığı, esneklik, denge ve çevikliği arttırmada yalnız dinamik germeye göre üstünlüğü olmadığı görüldü. Bu sonuçların performans öncesi ısınma protokolleri sırasında dikkate alınması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Germe
• Gevşetme
• Esneklik
• Denge.

Comparison of acute effects of dynamic stretching and myofascial release on lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance and agility in recreational male soccer players

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the acute effects of only dynamic stretching to dynamic stretching and myofascial release on lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance and agility.

Methods: Twenty-seven recreational male soccer players (age 20.55±1.47 years; height 174.70±4.42 cm; body weight 70.18±8.67 kg) were included in the study. The first 14 athletes performed only dynamic stretching and the last 13 athletes performed dynamic stretching and myofascial release on the first day. On the second day; the first 14 athletes performed dynamic stretching and myofascial release, and the last 13 athletes performed only dynamic stretching. Temperature with thermal camera, flexibility with sit-and-reach; balance with Y balance and agility with T test were assessed before and after the methods in both days.

Results: Dynamic stretching improved lower extremity temperature, flexibility and agility (p<0.05). Dynamic stretching and myofascial release improved lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral), and agility (p<0.05). However, dynamic stretching and myofascial release are not effective in increasing lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance and agility as compared to only dynamic stretching (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Dynamic stretching improved lower extremity temperature, flexibility and agility. Dynamic stretching and myofascial release improved lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance, and agility. Dynamic stretching and myofascial release had no superiority in increasing lower extremity temperature, flexibility, balance and agility as compared to only dynamic stretching. It should be considered for pre-performance warm-up protocols.

Keywords

• Stretching
• Release
• Flexibility
• Balance

References

1. 1. Rahnama N. Preventing sport injuries: improving performance. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3:143-144.
2. 2. Romaratezabala E, Nakamura FY, Castillo D, et al. Influence of warm-up duration on physical performance and psychological perceptions in handball players. Res Sports Med. 2018;26:230-243.
3. 3. Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:2633- 2651.
4. 4. Schleip R, & Müller DG. Training principles for fascial connective tissues: scientific foundation and suggested practical applications. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013;17:103-115.
5. 5. Yamaguchi T, Ishii K. Effects of static stretching for 30 seconds and dynamic stretching on leg extension power. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:677-683.
6. 6. Amiri-Khorasani M, Sahebozamani M, Tabrizi KG, et al. Acute effect of different stretching methods on Illinois agility test in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:2698-2704.
7. 7. Jaggers JR, Swank AM, Frost KL, et al. The acute effects of dynamic and ballistic stretching on vertical jump height, force, and power. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:1844-1849.
8. 8. Opplert J, Babault N. Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Sports Med. 2018;48:299-325.

9. 9. Chen CH, Chang CK, Tseng WC, et al. Acute effects of different warm-up protocols on sports performance in elite male collegiate handball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2020, doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003547
10. 10. Niles B, Sinclair P. The effects of self-myofascial release compared to dynamic warm-up on muscle performance (Doctoral dissertation, Azusa Pacific University), 2020.
11. 11. McKenney K, Elder AS, Elder C, et al. Myofascial release as a treatment for orthopaedic conditions: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2013;48:522-527.
12. 12. Beardsley C, Škarabot J. Effects of selfmyofascial release: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19:747-758.
13. 13. Patel DG, Vyas NJ, Sheth MS. Immediate effect of application of bilateral self myo- fascial release on the plantar surface of the foot on hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility: A quasi experimental study. Foot. 2016;3:7.
14. 14. Le Gal J, Begon M, Gillet B, et al. Effects of selfmyofascial release on shoulder function and perception in adolescent tennis players. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2018;27:530-535.
15. 15. Fairall RR, Cabell L, Boergers RJ, et al. Acute effects of selfmyofascial release and stretching in overhead athletes with Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21:648-52.
16. 16. Wiewelhove T, Döweling A, Schneider C, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Front Physiol. 2019;10:376.
17. 17. Debski P, Bialas E, Gnat R. The parameters of foam rolling, self-myofascial release treatment: a review of the literature. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2019;11:36-46.
18. 18. Fernández-Cuevas I, Sillero-Quintana M, Garcia-Concepcion MA, et al. Monitoring skin thermal response to training with infrared thermography. New Stud Athl. 2014;29:57-71.
19. 19. Holey LA, Dixon J, Selfe J. An exploratory thermographic investigation of the effects of connective tissue massage on autonomic function. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34:457-462.
20. 20. Ayala F, de Baranda PS, Croix MDS, et al. Absolute reliability of five clinical tests for assessing hamstring flexibility in professional futsal players. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:142-147.
21. 21. Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, et al. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4:92-99.
22. 22. Pauole K, Madole K, Garhammer J, et al. Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:443-450.
23. 23. Behm DG, Cavanaugh T, Quigley P, et al. Acute bouts of upper and lower body static and dynamic stretching increase non-local joint range of motion. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116:241-9.
24. 24. Richman ED, Tyo BM, Nicks CR. Combined effects of self-myofascial release and dynamic stretching on range of motion, jump, sprint, and agility performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:1795-1803.
25. 25. Rana KS, Lehri A, Ramteke S. Acute effects of dynamic versus static stretching on explosive agility of young football players. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy. 2018;14. DOI:10.18376/jesp/2018/v14/i1/111294.
26. 26. Chtourou H, Aloui A, Hammouda O, et al. Effect of static and dynamic stretching on the diurnal variations of jump performance in soccer players. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70534.
27. 27. Jeong Y, Park J, Yu J, et al. Immediate effects of release ball massage and self-stretching exercise on hamstring’s temperature, range of motion and strength in 20’s women. Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research. 2019;10:1739-1745.
28. 28. Murray AM, Jones TW, Horobeanu C, et al. Sixty seconds of foam rolling does not affect functional flexibility or change muscle temperature in adolescent athletes. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2016;11:765.
29. 29. Su H, Chang NJ, Wu WL, et al. Acute effects of foam rolling, static stretching, and dynamic stretching during warm-ups on muscular flexibility and strength in young adults. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26:469-477.
30. 30. Adams T, Carlson A, Hunt J, et al. Effect of dynamic stretching and self-myofascial release on muscle power and flexibility. International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings, 2016;8(4):36.
31. 31. Nichol L, Battey G, Mitchell S, et al. Effects on dynamic and static stretching and selfmyofascial release on muscle power and flexibility. International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings, 2017;8:51.
32. 32. De Benito AM, Valldecabres R, Ceca D, et al. Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue. PeerJ. 2019; 7: e8000.
33. 33. Grabow L, Young JD, Byrne JM, et al. Unilateral Rolling of the foot did not affect nonlocal range of motion or balance. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16:209-218.
34. 34. Leblebici H, Yarar H, Aydın EM, et al. The acute effects of different stretching on dynamic balance performance. International Journal of Sport Studies, 2017;7:153-159.
35. 35. Denerel N, Ergün M, Yüksel O, et al. The acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on dynamic balance performance. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 2019;54:148-157.
36. 36. Henning CJ, Stovern O, Porcari JP, et al. The acute effects of foam rolling on ankle and knee range of motion, hamstring flexibility, agility, and vertical jump height. International Journal of Research in Exercise Physiology, 2019;14:44-54.
37. 37. Peacock CA, Krein DD, Silver TA, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release in the form of foam rolling improves performance testing. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014;7:202.31
38. 38. Dallas G, Theodorou A, Paradisis G. The effect of different duration of dynamic stretching on sprint run and agility test on female gymnast. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2019;19:268-272.