Predicting Therapeutic Alliance: Supervisory Alliance and Supervisee’s Attachment Style

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how attachment styles and supervisory alliance predict the therapeutic alliance. Data was collected using The Therapeutic Alliance Scale, the Working Alliance Inventory: Trainee Form, and Attachment Styles in Interpersonal Relationships Scale. The study administered measuring instruments to 361 undergraduate counseling students (i.e., supervisees) from seven different state universities who had completed at least three counseling and supervision sessions. The data was analyzed using Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient and Multiple Linear Regression analysis methods. The findings revealed that supervisees’ secure attachment styles positively and significantly predicted the therapeutic alliance. While the anxious-preoccupied attachment style did not significantly predict the goal and task sub-dimensions of the therapeutic alliance, it did significantly predict the bond sub-dimension and the total score of the therapeutic alliance. In contrast, the avoidant attachment style only significantly predicted the bond sub-dimension of the therapeutic alliance. Furthermore, the supervisory alliance was significantly predictor for all dimensions of the therapeutic alliance, as well as the total score.

Keywords

• Attachment Styles
• Counseling
• Supervision
• Supervisory Alliance
• Therapeutic Alliance

Ethical Statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards Ethics Approval “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.” Consent to participate “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”

Thanks

This study is based on the master's thesis completed by the first author in 2019 under the supervision of the second and third authors.

References

1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. An, M., Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., & Hill, C. E. (2023). Working alliance after transferring from one therapist to another in a training clinic: Influence of therapist attachment style. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 70(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000642
3. Aponte, H. J., & Carol Carlsen, J. (2009). An instrument for person-of-the-therapist supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00127.x
4. Areas, M., Babl, A. M., Fernandez-Alvarez, J., Roussos, A., Botella, C., García-Palacios, A., ... & Penedo, J. M. G. (2023). Therapeutic Alliance and Treatment Expectations: Predicting Outcomes in Exposure Treatments for Specific Phobia. Cognitive therapy and research, 47(2), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-022-10343-8
5. Arnow, B. A., Steidtmann, D., Blasey, C., Manber, R., Constantino, M. J., Klein, D. N., Markowitz, J. C., Rothbaum, B. O., Thase, M. E., Fisher, A. J., & Kocsis, J. H. (2013). The relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in two distinct psychotherapies for chronic depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(4), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031530
6. Bahrick, A. S. (1989). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance [Doctoral dissertation] The Ohio State University.
7. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
8. Balkin, R. S., & Kleist, D. M. (2017). Counseling research: A practitioner-scholar approach. American Counseling Association.

9. Berant, E. ve Obegi, J. H. (2009). Attachment-informed psychotherapy research with adults. Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults. Guilford Press.
10. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
11. Bernecker, S. L., Levy, K. N., & Ellison, W. D. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relation between patient adult attachment style and the working alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 24(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.809561
12. Black, S., Hardy, G., Turpin, G., & Parry, G. (2005). Self-reported attachment styles and therapeutic orientation of therapists and their relationship with reported general alliance quality and problems in therapy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608305X43784
13. Bordin, E.S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice,16, 252–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
14. Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00110 00083111007
15. Bourke, E., Barker, C., & Fornells‐Ambrojo, M. (2021). Systematic review and meta‐analysis of therapeutic alliance, engagement, and outcome in psychological therapies for psychosis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 94(3), 822–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12330
16. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Attachment. -1969.-(RUidnr.: M102591232). Basic books.
17. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. Routledge.
18. Bruck, E., Winston, A., Aderholt, S., & Muran, J. C. (2006). Predictive Validity of Patient and Therapist Attachment and Introject Styles. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2006.60.4.393
19. Burke, W. R. (1991). Weakenings and repairs of the working alliance in counselor supervision (Order No. 9136316). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304010169). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/weakenings-repairs-working-alliance-counselor/docview/304010169/se-2
20. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group
21. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
22. Cooper, M. L., Shaver, P. R., & Collins, N. L. (1998). Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1380–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1380
23. Daly, J. S. (2003). A qualitative analysis of the supervisory working alliance as perceived by the supervisee (Order No. 3100727). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305213576). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/qualitative-analysis-supervisory-working-alliance/docview/305213576/se-2
24. DePue, M. K., Lambie, G. W., Liu, R., & Gonzalez, J. (2016). Investigat-ing supervisory relationships and therapeutic alliances using structural equation modeling. Counselor Education & Supervision, 55(4), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12053
25. Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., Horvath, A. O., & Wampold, B. E. (2021). Examining therapist effects in the alliance–outcome relationship: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 89(5), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000637
26. Dunkle, J. H., & Friedlander, M. L. (1996). Contribution of therapist experience and personal characteristics to the working alliance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.456
27. Dykeman, C. (1995). An Introduction to Working Alliance Theory for Professional Counselors. ERIC veri tabanından ulaşılmıştır (Number: ED387755).
28. Eames, V., & Roth, A. (2000). Patient attachment orientation and the early working alliance: A study of patient and therapist reports of alliance quality and ruptures. Psychotherapy Research, 10(4), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/10.4.421
29. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(3), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322
30. Elvins, R. ve Green, J. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1167-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.002
31. Enlow, P. T., McWhorter, L. G., Genuario, K., & Davis, A. (2019). Supervisor–supervisee interactions: The importance of the supervisory working alliance. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(3), 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000243
32. Ertl, M. M., Ellis, M. V., & Peterson, L. P. (2023). Supervisor Cultural Humility and Supervisee Nondisclosure: The Supervisory Working Alliance Matters. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100002311593
33. Farber, B. A., & Metzger, J. A. (2009). The therapist as secure base. In J. H. Obegi & E. Berant (Eds.), Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults (pp. 46–70). The Guilford Press.
34. Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wlodasch, D., Horvath, A. O., Solomonov, N., & Wampold, B. E. (2020). Assessing the alliance–outcome association adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment processes: A meta-analytic summary of direct comparisons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(6), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000424
35. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Pearson.
36. Goldfried, M. R., & Davila, J. (2005). The role of relationship and technique in therapeutic change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.42.4.421
37. Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, Pearson Educational International.
38. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
39. Hedegaard, A. E. (2020). The supervisory alliance in group supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 36(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12495
40. Hill, C. E. (1991). Almost everything you ever wanted to know about how to do process research on counseling and psychotherapy but didn't know who to ask. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. & L. J. Schneider, Research in counseling (pp. 85–118). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186
42. Huppert, J. D., Kivity, Y., Barlow, D. H., Gorman, J. M., Shear, M. K., & Woods, S. W. (2014). Therapist effects and the outcome—alliance correlation in cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder with agoraphobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 52, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.11.001
43. Kaiser, J., Hanschmidt, F., & Kersting, A. (2021). The association between therapeutic alliance and outcome in internet-based psychological interventions: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106512
44. Kandemir, M. ve İlhan, T. (2019). Terapötik İttifak Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması: Psikolojik danışman formu. 28. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi 'nde sunulan bildiri. Ankara, Türkiye.
45. Kandemir, M. (2017). Psikolojik danışmanlar açısından terapötik ittifakın incelenmesi. [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi.
46. Kandemir, M. ve İlhan, T. (2017, 12-14 Mayıs). Kişilerarası İlişkilerde Bağlanma Stilleri Ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 2. Avrasya Pozitif Psikoloji Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
47. Levy, K. N., & Kelly, K. M. (2009). Using interviews to assess adult attachment. In J. H. Obegi & E. Berant (Eds.), Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults (pp. 121–152). The Guilford Press.
48. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Que, J. (2009). Relationship dimensions in the professional supervision of psychology graduates: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927451
49. Meydan, B., & Denizli, S. (2018). Turkish undergraduate supervisees’ views regarding supervisory relationship. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 1-24.
50. Meydan, B., & Koçyiğit-Özyiğit, M. (2016). Süpervizyon ilişkisi: Psikolojik danışma süpervizyonunda kritik bir öğe. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 225-257.
51. Meyer, B., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2001). Attachment style. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.466
52. Milne, D., Aylott, H., Fitzpatrick, H., & Ellis, M. V. (2008). How does clinical supervision work? Using a "best evidence synthesis" approach to construct a basic model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325220802487915
53. Mohr, J. J., Gelso, C. J., & Hill, C. E. (2005). Client and Counselor Trainee Attachment as Predictors of Session Evaluation and Countertransference Behavior in First Counseling Sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.298
54. Norcross, J. C. (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. Oxford University Press.
55. Petrowski, K., Nowacki, K., Pokorny, D., & Buchheim, A. (2011). Matching the patient to the therapist: The roles of the attachment status and the helping alliance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(11), 839–844. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182349cce
56. Priebe, S. ve McCabe, R. (2006). The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric settings. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113(429), 69−72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00721.x
57. Rizou, E., & Giannouli, V. (2020). An exploration of the experience of trainee integrative psychotherapists on therapeutic alliance in the light of their attachment style. Health Psychology Research, 8(3).
58. Sarıkaya, Y. ve İlhan, T. (2016, 2-4 June). Terapötik ittifak envanteri aday danışman formunun türkçe uyarlama çalışması. International congress on education’da sunulmuş bildiri, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
59. Sarıkaya, Y., & İlhan, T. (2022). Supervısory roles styles and counseling self efficacy: Mediatıng role of the supervisory working alliance. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 10(1), 455-473
60. Sauer, E. M., Lopez, F. G., & Gormley, B. (2003). Respective contributions of therapist and client adult attachment orientations to the development of the early working alliance: A preliminary growth modeling study. Psychotherapy Research, 13(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/kpg027
61. Schauenburg, H., Buchheim, A., Beckh, K., Nolte, T., Brenk-Franz, K., Leichsenring, F., Strack, M., & Dinger, U. (2010). "The influence of psychodynamically oriented therapists’ attachment representations on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy": Erratum. Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2010.481516
62. Schweitzer, R. D., & Witham, M. (2018). The supervisory alliance: Comparison of measures and implications for a supervision toolkit. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 18(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12143
63. Shaver, P., Hazan, C., & Bradshaw, D. (1988). Love as attachment. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 68–99). Yale University Press.
64. Trangucci, K. A. (2013). The supervisory working alliance and self-efficacy of school psychology graduate interns (Doctoral dissertation). ETD Collection for Fordham University. AAI3560864. Retrieved from https://fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI3560864
65. Totura, C. M. W., Fields, S. A., & Karver, M. S. (2018). The role of the therapeutic relationship in psychopharmacological treatment outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychiatric Services, 69(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700114
66. Tschuschke, V., Koemeda-Lutz, M., von Wyl, A., Crameri, A., & Schulthess, P. (2020). The impact of patients' and therapists' views of the therapeutic alliance on treatment outcome in psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 208(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001111
67. TÜİK. (2018). Sınıflamalar: Türkiye istatistiki bölge birimleri sınıflaması. Retrieved March 23, 2018, from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/MicroVeri/GYKA_2014/turkce/metaveri/siiniiflamalar/index.html
68. Wampold, B. E. (2013). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings (Vol. 9). Routledge.
69. Yusof, Y. ve Carpenter, J. (2016). Family therapists’ adult attachment styles and the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Family Therapy, 38(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12079