Foreign Language Curriculum Literacy: Analysis of the Views of Teacher Candidates in Terms of the Needs of Teachers

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 74 - 88

Duygu İleritürk

https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1468227

Abstract

The curriculum functions as a pedagogical framework that provides guidance to educators in the facilitation of the educational process. The curriculum provides guidance to educators regarding the methods and degree to which desired learning objectives would be attained, as well as the specific learning artifacts that would be produced. Additionally, it furnishes details pertaining to the content, methodology, timing, and rationale behind pupils' learning outcome of knowledge. Curriculum literacy plays a crucial role in supporting educators in various aspects, such as designing and implementing new curriculums, as well as preparing for their execution. The objective of this study is to ascertain the necessary competencies for aspiring educators to enhance their comprehension and implementation of educational curricula, as well as to investigate the literacy requirements of potential teachers in educational curriculums. The research was structured as a case study. The convenience sampling approach was used for selecting participants. The researcher used a semi-structured interview form to gather comprehensive data for the study. According to the results of the study, the perspectives of prospective foreign language teachers indicate a heightened awareness of their own understanding, implementation, and adaptation of foreign language curriculums, hence highlighting opportunities for enhancing their skills in this field. Furthermore, the results derived from this study contribute to the enhanced awareness and expertise of prospective foreign language educators in the realm of curriculum literacy, hence enabling them to practice curriculum with greater efficacy.

Keywords

curriculum literacy, english as a foreign language teacher candidates, foreign language curriculum literacy, foreign language

References

• Adams, W. C. (2020). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492-505). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
• Anderson, K., Raikes, A., Kosaraju, S. & Solano, A. (2021). National early childhood care and education quality monitoring systems. https://www.edu-links.org/sites/default/files/media/file/global_20170427_early-childhood-care.pdf
• Aydın, R. & Kurt, S. (2022). Examination of teachers’ perceptions of self-efficiency and curriculum literacy. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1): 90-117. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.422
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2022). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
• Çetinkaya, S. & Tabak, S. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim curriculumı okuryazarlık yeterlilikleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1): 296-309. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.535482
• Demirel, O. (2011). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Kuramdan uygulamaya. (17.baskı). Pegem Akademi.
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
• Flores, M. A. & Swennen, A. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4): 453-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1824253
• Jonker, H., Marz, V. & Voogt, J. (2020). Curriculum flexibility in a blended curriculum. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4926
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Plöger, W., Scholl, D. & Seifert, A. (2018). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: The effective use of videos to assist the acquisition and application of pedagogical knowledge in pre-service teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.009
• Sarıgöz, O. & Bolat, Y. (2018). Examination of the competencies of the pre-service teachers studying at the education faculties about educational curriculum literacy. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 10(9): 103-110. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2018.0566
• Sönmez, V. (2018). Eğitim programları ve öğretim. (3.baskı) Pegem Akademi.
• Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. Vivar: Pearson Education.
• Pomerantz, F & Kaufman, D. (2020). Reflections on noticing research and implications for the future. In Developing Habits of Noticing in Literacy and Language Classrooms: Research and Practice Across Professional Cultures, eds. Alyson Simpson, Francesca Pomerantz, Douglas Kaufman dn Sue Ellis. Routledge Publications.
• Roslin, Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F. & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 12(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229
• Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Mpolomoka, D. L., Akpan, W. M. & Davy, M. (2024). Curriculum design for the digital age: Strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Research, 11(7), 185-201. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382648757_Curriculum_Design_for_the_Digital_Age_Strategies_for_Effective_Technology_Integration_in_Higher_Education
• Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2021). Characterizing and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri Güncelleştirilmiş Geliştirilmiş, (5th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publications.