YEŞİL KOZMETİKLER

Year 2023, , 667 - 686, 20.05.2023

Özge İnal

https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1230565

Abstract

Amaç: Son yıllarda, sentetik hammaddeler ile üretilen kozmetiklerin insan sağlığı ve çevre için oluşturduğu olumsuz etkiler, çevre bilinci doğrultusunda sürdürülebilir ürünleri tercih eden tüketicilerin sayısındaki artış ve üreticilerin kurumsal sorumluluğa verdiği önem nedeni ile yeşil kozmetiklere olan ilgi artmaktadır. Yeşil kozmetik ürünler, kontrollü veya organik tarımdan yola çıkılarak elde edilen doğal veya organik hammaddeler ile sürdürülebilir üretim metotları kullanılarak üretilen, geri dönüşümlü veya yeniden kullanılabilir ambalaj ile piyasaya sunulan ürünlerdir. Henüz hiçbir yönetmelikte bu ürün yelpazesi için yaptırım bulunmamaktadır. Ancak Amerika’da USDA/NOP ve Avrupa’da COSMOS, Ecocert, NaTrue, BDIH gibi standartlar ile ISO 16128 gibi harmonize standartlar aracılığıyla hammadde seçimi, üretim aşamaları ve ambalajlama, doğa ve insan sağlığı açısından ürünler kontrol altına alınmaya çalışılmaktadır. Türkiye İlaç Tıbbi Cihaz Kurumu-TİTCK tarafından yayınlanan doğal ve organik kozmetiklere yönelik yönetmelik eki uyarınca ülkemizde doğal ve organik kozmetiklerde ürün iddialarına yönelik sertifikasyon sağlanmalı ve sertifika logosu ambalajda yer almalıdır. Türkiye’de COSMOS sertifikaları ETKO ve IFC Global gibi sertifika sağlayıcıları aracılığı ile alınabilmektedir.
Sonuç ve Tartışma: Bu derlemede, doğal ve organik ürün standartlarının oluşum süreci ve şartları, yeşil formülasyonlarda tercih edilen hammaddeler, üretimde kullanılan yeşil kimya prensipleri ve sürdürülebilirlik açısından yeşil kozmetikler ele alınmıştır.

Keywords

COSMOS, doğal kozmetikler, ecocert, organik kozmetikler, sürdürülebilirlik

GREEN COSMETICS

Abstract

Objective: Recently, the interest in green cosmetics increased due to the negative effects of cosmetics produced with synthetic raw materials on human health and the environment, the increase in the number of consumers who prefer sustainable products in line with environmental awareness, and the importance given to corporate responsibility by manufacturers. Green cosmetics are the products produced sustainable production methods using natural or organic raw materials that comes from the controlled or organic agriculture, and offered to the market with recyclable or reusable packaging. No regulation has yet imposed sanctions for this product range. However, by means of standards such as USDA/NOP in the USA and COSMOS, Ecocert, NaTrue, BDIH in Europe and harmonized standards such as ISO 16128, products are tried to be controlled in terms of raw material selection, production stages and packaging, nature and human health. In accordance with the addendum to the regulation on natural and organic cosmetics published by the Turkish Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency-TİTCK, certification for product claims in natural and organic cosmetics should be provided and the certificate logo should be placed on the packaging. In TURKEY, COSMOS certificates can be obtained through certificate providers such as ETKO and IFC Global.

Keywords

COSMOS, ecocert, natural cosmetics, organic cosmetics, sustainability

References

• 1. Özden, S., Saygılı, M., Sütütemiz, N. (2019). Kozmetik ürünlerin tüketiminde sağlık bilincinin rolü. Conference: XI. IBANESS Congress Series Tekirdağ-Türkiye, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331982493.
• 2. https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/04/27/2429989/28124/en/Insights-on-the-Natural-and-Organic-Cosmetics-29-9-Billion-Global-Market-to-2027-Key-Drivers-Restraints-and-Trends.html/.Erişim tarihi: 01.01.2023.
• 3. Bozza, A., Campi, C., Garelli, S., Ugazio, E., Battaglia, L. (2022). Current regulatory and market frameworks in green cosmetics: The role of certification. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 30, 100851. [CrossRef]
• 4. Šniepienė, G., Jankauskienė, R. (2021). Organic personal care cosmetics: behavior of choice and consumption. International Conference on Innovatıons in Science and Education (Medicine and Pharmacy), Prague, Czech Republic www.iseic.cz proceedings of CBU in Medicine and Pharmacy Vol. 2. [CrossRef]
• 5. Nagasawa, S., Kizu, Y. (2012). Green action as a luxury strategy in the field of cosmetics. Waseda Business & Economic Studies, 48.
• 6. https://www.epa.gov/sustainability/sustainable-manufacturing/. Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2022.
• 7. https://www.cosmos-standard.org/en/cosmos-standard/. Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2022.
• 8. https://www.ecocert.com/en/about-us, Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2022.
• 9. Beerling, J., Sahota, A. (2014). Chapter 10:Green Standards, Certification and Indices. In A. Sahota (Ed.), How the Cosmetics Industry is Greening up (pp. 217-238). New York: John Wiley and Sons. [CrossRef]
• 10. Olson, A.B. (2011). The Mechanics of Developing a Natural/Organic Nongovernmental Cosmetic Standard. In N. Dayan, L. Kromidas (Eds.), Formulating, Packaging, and Marketing of Natural Cosmetic Products (pp. 27–47). New York: John Wiley and Sons. [CrossRef]
• 11. Lee, J., Kwon, K.H. (2022). Future perspective safe cosmetics: Focused on associated with ISO natural organic index. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 21, 6619-6627. [CrossRef]
• 12. Organic Cosmetics. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling-claims/organic-cosmetics, Erişim tarihi: 28.12.2022.
• 13. Organic Integrity Database, USDA Organic Web site (2022). from https://organic.ams.usda.gov/integrity/Certifiers/CertifiersLocationsSearchPage/. Erişim tarihi: 28.12.2022.
• 14. COSMOS Standard Certification bodies (2022). from https://www.cosmos-standard.org/en/certification/certification-bodies/. Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2022.
• 15. Romero, V., Khury, E., Aiello, L.M., Foglio, M.A., Leonardi, G.R. (2018). Differences between organic and natural cosmetics: clarifying literature for prescribers. Surgical and Cosmetic Dermatology, 10(3), 188-193. [CrossRef]
• 16. COSMOS STANDARD Criteria, Version 4.0 (2023). from https://media.cosmos-standard.org/filer_public/49/df/49dff58f-247a-4049-a84a-1177d6eca2c9/cosmos- standard_v40.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 01.01.2023.
• 17. NATRUE Label criteria:Requirements to be met by natural and organic cosmetics, Version 3.9 (2021). from https://www.natrue.org/uploads/2022/10/EN-NATRUE-Label_Requirements_v3.9-final-version.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 02.01.2023.
• 18. ISO 16128-2:2017 Cosmetics - Guidelines on technical definitions and criteria for natural and organic cosmetic ingredients - Part 2: Criteria for ingredients and products (2022) from https://www.iso.org/standard/65197.html, Erişim tarihi: 28.12.2022.
• 19. Doğal ve Organik Kozmetik Bileşen ve Ürün İddialarına İlişkin Kılavuz, Sürüm 1.0 (2005). from https://www.titck.gov.tr/mevzuat/dogal-ve-organik-kozmetik-bilesen-ve-urun-iddialarina-iliskin-kilavuz surum-1-0-27122018172905, Erişim tarihi: 01.01.2023.
• 20. Amberg, N., Fogarassy, C. (2019). Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics market resources. Resources, 8(3), 137. [CrossRef]
• 21. Beerling, J. (2014). Chapher 9: Green Formulations and Ingredients. In A. Sahota (Ed.), Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry is Greening up, (pp. 197-215.) London: Wiley. [CrossRef]
• 22. Fonseca-Santos, B., Corrêa, M.A., Chorilli, M. (2015). Sustainability, natural and organic cosmetics: consumer, products, efficacy, toxicological and regulatory considerations. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 51(1), 17-26. [CrossRef]
• 23. Barbaud, A., Lafforgue, C. (2021). Risks associated with cosmetic ingredients. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie, 148(2), 77-93. [CrossRef]
• 24. Garrison, M., Dayan, N. (2011). Formulating cosmetics with natural oils, fats, butters, and waxes. In N. Dayan, L. Kromidas (Eds.), Formulating, Packaging, and Marketing of Natural Cosmetic Products (pp. 215-238). New York: John Wiley and Sons. [CrossRef]
• 25. Sharmeen, J.B., Mahomoodally, F.M., Zengin, G., Maggi, F. (2021). Essential oils as natural sources of fragrance compounds for cosmetics and cosmeceuticals. Molecules, 26, 666. [CrossRef]
• 26. Metin, C., Baygar, T. (2018). Denizel kaynaklardan elde edilen biyoaktif maddeler ve kozmetik alanında kullanımı. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 14(4), 339–350. [CrossRef]
• 27. Bhattacharjee, D., Patil, A., Jain, V., Preethi.S. (2021). A comparison of natural and synthetic sunscreen agents: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 13, 524. [CrossRef]
• 28. Papageorgiou, S., Varvaresou, A., Tsirivas, E., Demetzos, C. (2010). New alternatives to cosmetics preservation. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 61(2), 107–123.
• 29. Resende, D.I.S.P., Ferreira, M., Magalhães, C., Sousa Lobo, J.M., Sousa, E., Almeida, I.F. (2021). Trends in the use of marine ingredients in anti-aging cosmetics. Algal Research, 55, 102273. [CrossRef]
• 30. Heinrich, U., Garbe, B., Tronnier, H. (2007). In vivo assessment of Ectoin: A randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 20, 211-218. [CrossRef]
• 31. Schagen, S., Overhagen, S., Bilstein, A. (2017). New data confirm skin revitalizing and stress protection by Glycoin® natural. Euro Cosmetics, 25(1/2), 24-27.
• 32. Pillai, R., Redmond, M., Röding, J. (2005). Anti-wrinkle therapy: Significant new findings in the non-invasive cosmetic treatment of skin wrinkles with beta-glucan. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 27(5), 292. [CrossRef]
• 33. Dini I., Laneri, S. (2019). Nutricosmetics: A brief overview, Phytotherapy Research, 33(12), 3054-3063. [CrossRef]
• 34. COSMOS STANDARD Technical Guide Version 4.0 1 January 2023 from https://media.cosmos-standard.org/filer_public/06/29/06298b4e-83cb-4064-ae46-f4578f9fc9f5/cosmos-standard_technical_guide_v40.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 05.01.2023
• 35. Siri Sindhura D.K., Jain, V. (2018). Challenges in formulating herbal cosmetics. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, 10(6), 47-53. [CrossRef]
• 36. Flanagan, J. (2011). Natural preservatives and preserving natural cosmetics. In N. Dayan, L. Kromidas (Eds.), Formulating, Packaging, and Marketing of Natural Cosmetic Products (pp 169-178). New York: John Wiley and Sons.[CrossRef]
• 37. Varvaresou, A., Papageorgiou, S., Tsirivas, E., Protopapa, E., Kintziou, H., Kefala, V., Demetzos, C. (2009). Self-preserving cosmetics. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 31(3), 163-175. [CrossRef]
• 38. Singh, A., Sharma, P.K., Malviya, R. (2011). Eco friendly pharmaceutical packaging material. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14(11), 1703-1716.
• 39. Beach, E.S., Cui, Z., Anastas, P.T. (2009). Green Chemistry: A design framework for sustainability. Energy and Environmental Science, 2(10), 1038-1049. [CrossRef]
• 40. Franca, C.C.V., Ueno, H.M. (2020). Green cosmetics: perspectives and challenges in the context of green chemistry. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 53, 133-150. [CrossRef]
• 41. Aguiar, J.B., Martins, A.M., Almeida, C., Ribeiro, H.M., Marto, J. (2022). Water sustainability: A waterless life cycle for cosmetic products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 35-51. [CrossRef]
• 42. Leslie, H.A. (2014). Review of microplastics in cosmetics. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies from https://assets.vu.nl/d8b6f1f5-816c-005b-1dc1-e363dd7ce9a5/702e44d9-2b00-43c9-8c6c-efce1179d2ad/Plastic_ingredients_in_Cosmetics_07-2014_FINAL_tcm296-409859.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 20.01.2023.
• 43. Zero waste Europe from https://zerowasteeurope.eu/, Erişim tarihi: 06.01.2023.