Navigating science education: motivations and challenges for primary school gifted children in Chinese science museums

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 13 - 22

Lu Zhou

Abstract

This paper delves into the motivations and challenges faced by parents in the context of science museum visits for primary school gifted children in China. The study aims to provide insights into why parents of primary school gifted children opt for science museums and examines the factors influencing their decision-making process. Conducting interviews with parents visiting a university-affiliated science museum, the research explores three key themes about science education for primary school children: situated learning, reliable information sources, and parent-child interaction. Besides, the study identifies the challenge of museum fatigue among primary school gifted children visitors, emphasizing the importance of addressing children's limited attention spans and cognitive abilities when designing science museum exhibitions. The paper concludes by proposing strategies to enhance the quality of public education activities in science museums affiliated with primary education institutions. In essence, this research provides valuable insights into the motivations and challenges faced by parents, offering guidance for improving science education activities within the context of primary school settings.

Keywords

Primary school, Gifted education, Science education, Out-of-school learning

References

• Andre, L., Durksen, T., & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: A decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20, 47-76.
• Andre, L., Tracy Durksen, & Volman, M. L. (2017). Museums as avenues of learning for children: A decade of research. Learning Environments Research, 20, 47-76.
• Bitgood, S. (2009). Museum fatigue: A critical review. Visitor Studies, 12(2), 93-111.
• Bourque, C. M., Houseal, A. K., Welsh, K. M., & Wenger, M. (2014). Free-choice family learning: a literature review for the National Park Service. Journal of Interpretation Research, 19(1), 7-29.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
• Falk, J. H. (2006). An identity‐centered approach to understanding museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(2), 151-166.
• Falk, J. H., Koran Jr, J. J., Dierking, L. D., & Dreblow, L. (1985). Predicting visitor behavior. Curator: The Museum Journal, 28(4), 249-258.
• Fender, J. G., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 28(3), 189-210.
• Feng, N., & Tang, S. (2021). A case study of family learning in a Chinese regional museum. Journal of Museum Education, 46(2), 216-231.
• Flewitt, R., Bangpan, M., Manyukhina, Y., & Wyse, D. (2023). Young children's engagement with objects in science museums: a rapid evidence assessment of research. Curator: The Museum Journal, 66(1), 129-148.
• Gilligan-Lee, K. A., Hawes, Z. C. K., Williams, A. Y., Farran, E. K., & Mix, K. S. (2023). Hands-On: Investigating the role of physical manipulatives in spatial training [Article]. Child Development, 94(5), 1205-1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13963
• Gong, X., Zhang, X., & Tsang, M. C. (2020). Creativity development in preschoolers: The effects of children’s museum visits and other education environment factors. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100932.
• Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Science Education, 94(4), 710-742.
• Henriksen, E. K., & Frøyland, M. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 393.
• Hou, H.-T., Wu, S.-Y., Lin, P.-C., Sung, Y.-T., Lin, J.-W., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). A blended mobile learning environment for museum learning. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 17(2), 207-218.
• Ji, J., Anderson, D., Wu, X., & Kang, C. (2014). Chinese family groups' museum visit motivations: a comparative study of Beijing and Vancouver. Curator: The Museum Journal, 57(1), 81-96.
• Kim, M., Dillon, J., & Song, J. (2020). The factors and features of museum fatigue in science centres felt by Korean students. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 419-436.
• Lacoe, J., Painter, G. D., & Williams., D. (2020). Museums as classrooms: The academic and behavioral impacts of “School in the Park”. AERA Open, 6(3), 2332858420940309.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
• Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69-119.
• Leyva, L. A., McNeill, T., Marshall, B. L., & Guzmán, O. A. (2021). It Seems like They Purposefully Try to Make as Many Kids Drop”: An Analysis of Logics and Mechanisms of Racial-Gendered Inequality in Introductory Mathematics Instruction. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(5), 784-814.
• Lichtman, M. (2012). Qualitative Research in Education: A User's Guide. SAGE Publications.
• Lv, J., & Li, S. (2011). Construction of humanized service of museums in the context of free opening: investigation and inspiration of free opening of Hubei Museum. Chinese Museum(4), 75-80.
• Maxwell, L. E., & Evans, G. W. (2002). Museums as learning settings: The importance of the physical environment. Journal of Museum Education, 27(1), 3-7.
• McLellan, H. (1994). Situated Learning: Continuing the Conversation. Educational Technology, 34(8), 7-8.
• Melber, L. M. (2003). Partnerships in science learning: Museum outreach and elementary gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 251-258.
• Moorhouse, N., Dieck, C., & Jung, T. (2019). An experiential view to children learning in museums with augmented reality. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(4), 402-418.
• Navas Iannini, A. M., & Pedretti, E. (2022). Museum staff perspectives about a sustainability exhibition: what do they tell us about scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1-21.
• Ozel, M., & Dogan, A. (2013). Gifted students’ perceptions of scientists. The New Educational Review, 31, 217-228.
• Rossano, M. J. (2012). The essential role of ritual in the transmission and reinforcement of social norms. Psychological bulletin, 138(3), 529.
• Sawyer, R. K. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
• Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., Liu, C. K., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile guide system using problem‐solving strategy for museum learning: a sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 106-115.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education: A vision of coherence for personnel preparation in the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 182-205.
• Willard, A. K., Busch, J. T., Cullum, K. A., Letourneau, S. M., Sobel, D. M., Callanan, M., & Legare, C. H. (2019). Explain this, explore that: A study of parent–child interaction in a children's museum. Child Development, 90(5), 598-617.