Research Article

DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?

Volume: 19 Number: 1 March 25, 2022
TR EN

DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?

Abstract

Aim: We aim to evaluate fetal cardiac output in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Material and Method: Thirty-two patients with ICP and 42 healthy pregnant women were included in the study. The diagnosis of ICP was made by detecting fasting bile acid value >10 µmol/L in symptomatic pregnant women. Fetal echocardiographic evaluations were performed >34 weeks of gestation. Demographic data, fetal cardiac output, and perinatal outcomes of the patients were compared between the groups. Results: In the ICP group aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were higher than the control group (p<0.001 and p<0.001). The left cardiac output (LCO), right cardiac output (RCO) and combine cardiac output (CCO) were similar between the groups (p=0.430, p=0.054, and p=0.134 respectively). Patients with ICP were divided into two groups as patients with serum bile acid (SBA) >40 µmol/L, severe disease, and others mild disease. Although right, left, and combined cardiac output was decreased in the severe disease of the ICP group, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.666, p=0.188, and p=0.236 respectively). Conclusion: In our study, we did not observe any adverse effect of ICP on fetal cardiac output, but more studies with severe ICP should be conducted.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Paus TC, Schneider G, van de Vondel P, Sauerbruch T, Reichel C. Diagnosis and therapy of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie 2004;42:623–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-2004-813165.
  2. 2. Smith DD, Rood KM. Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020;63:134–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000495.
  3. 3. Piechota J, Jelski W. Intrahepatic Cholestasis in Pregnancy: Review of the Literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM9051361.
  4. 4. Kenny JF, Plappert T, Doubilet P, Saltzman DH, Cartier M, Zollars L, et al. Changes in intracardiac blood flow velocities and right and left ventricular stroke volumes with gestational age in the normal human fetus: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation 1986;74:1208–16. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.74.6.1208.
  5. 5. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Mancuso S, Romanini C. Longitudinal assessment of blood flow velocity waveforms in the healthy human fetus. Prenatal Diagnosis 1987;7:613–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/PD.1970070902.
  6. 6. Bouscarel B, Kroll SD, Fromm H. Signal transduction and hepatocellular bile acid transport: cross talk between bile acids and second messengers. Gastroenterology 1999;117:433–52. https://doi.org/10.1053/GAST.1999.0029900433.
  7. 7. Williamson C, Miragoli M, Sheikh Abdul Kadir S, Abu-Hayyeh S, Papacleovoulou G, Geenes V, et al. Bile acid signaling in fetal tissues: implications for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2011;29:58–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000324130.
  8. 8. Gorelik J, Harding SE, Shevchuk AI, Koralage D, Lab M, de Swiet M, et al. Taurocholate induces changes in rat cardiomyocyte contraction and calcium dynamics. Clinical Science 2002;103:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs1030191.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 25, 2022

Submission Date

February 7, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 10, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 19 Number: 1

APA
Turgut, E., Denizli, R., Farisoğulları, N., Sakcak, B., Göncü Ayhan, Ş., & Sahin, D. (2022). DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT? Jinekoloji-Obstetrik Ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, 19(1), 1159-1163. https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1069557
AMA
1.Turgut E, Denizli R, Farisoğulları N, Sakcak B, Göncü Ayhan Ş, Sahin D. DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT? Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi. 2022;19(1):1159-1163. doi:10.38136/jgon.1069557
Chicago
Turgut, Ezgi, Ramazan Denizli, Nihat Farisoğulları, Bedri Sakcak, Şule Göncü Ayhan, and Dilek Sahin. 2022. “DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?”. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik Ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 19 (1): 1159-63. https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1069557.
EndNote
Turgut E, Denizli R, Farisoğulları N, Sakcak B, Göncü Ayhan Ş, Sahin D (March 1, 2022) DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT? Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 19 1 1159–1163.
IEEE
[1]E. Turgut, R. Denizli, N. Farisoğulları, B. Sakcak, Ş. Göncü Ayhan, and D. Sahin, “DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?”, Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1159–1163, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.38136/jgon.1069557.
ISNAD
Turgut, Ezgi - Denizli, Ramazan - Farisoğulları, Nihat - Sakcak, Bedri - Göncü Ayhan, Şule - Sahin, Dilek. “DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?”. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi 19/1 (March 1, 2022): 1159-1163. https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1069557.
JAMA
1.Turgut E, Denizli R, Farisoğulları N, Sakcak B, Göncü Ayhan Ş, Sahin D. DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT? Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi. 2022;19:1159–1163.
MLA
Turgut, Ezgi, et al. “DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT?”. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik Ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 1159-63, doi:10.38136/jgon.1069557.
Vancouver
1.Ezgi Turgut, Ramazan Denizli, Nihat Farisoğulları, Bedri Sakcak, Şule Göncü Ayhan, Dilek Sahin. DOES INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY CAUSE A DIFFERENCE IN FETAL CARDIAC OUTPUT? Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi. 2022 Mar. 1;19(1):1159-63. doi:10.38136/jgon.1069557