Is Colposcopic Examination Necessary In Women With High Risk HPV Without HPV16/18?

Year 2018, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 102 - 105, 01.07.2018

İlknur Çöl Madendağ Yusuf Madendağ Erdem Şahin Mefkure Eraslan Şahin Gökhan Açmaz

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the results of colposcopy and biopsy between HPV16/18 infected patients and other high-risk HPV hr- HPV infected patients.Material and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in January 2016-December 2017 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients who were admitted to the gynecology clinic between the ages of 30-64 years and whose hr-HPV was detected in the cervical specimens after the evaluation were included in the study. Hr-HPV types were defined as HPV- 16,-18,-31,-45,-33,-35,-51,-52,-58,-59. Patients were divided into two groups as HPV16 /18 positive and other positive HPV types. Demographic features and histopathological findings were compared between the two groups.Result: A total of 530 patients were included in the study. 240 patients were in the HPV16/18 positive group; 290 patients were classified in the other hr-HPV positive group. There was no difference between the groups for age, gravidity, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use and systemic disease presence p=0.832,p=0.785,p=0.852,p=0.812 ,p=0.792 and p=0.880,respectively . LGSIL and HGSIL rates were significantly higher in the HPV16 /18 group than in the other hr-HPV group p=0.001,p=0.001, respectively . In the HPV16 /18 group, LGSIL rate was 25.8% and HGSIL rate was 25.4%. The rates were 19.6% for LGSIL and 12.4% for HGSIL in the other group, although not as much as in HPV16 /18 group. Cervical cancer was detected in 1 patient in both groups.Conclusion: The other hr-HPV positivity is associated with cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. The colposcopic examination and biopsy are a suitable approach for these patients.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus, LGSIL, HGSIL, cervical cancer

HPV 16 / 18 Dışındaki Yüksek Riskli HPV’li Kadınlarda Kolposkopik İnceleme Gerekli Midir?

Abstract

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı diğer yüksek riskli HPV yr-HPV enfeksiyonu varlığında, mevcut HPV tiplerinin servikal prekanseröz lezyonlar ve servikal kanser ile ilişkisini değerlendirerek kolposkopi ve biyopsi sonuçlarını, HPV16/18 pozitif hastalar ile karşılaştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma bir tersiyer merkezde Ocak 2016-Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya 30-64 yaş arasında jinekoloji kliniğine başvuran yapılan değerlendirme sonrasında servikal örneklerde yr-HPV tespit edilen hastalar dahil edildi. Yr-HPV tipleri HPV-16,-18,-31,-45,-33,-35,-51,-52,-58,-59 varlığı olarak tanımlandı. Hastalar HPV16/18 pozitif olanlar ve diğer yr-HPV tipleri pozitif olanlar olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Histopatolojik sonuçlar normal, metaplazi, servisit, LGSIL, HGSIL ve serviks kanseri olarak tanımlandı. İki grup arasındaki demografik özellikler ve histopatolojik bulgular karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 530 hasta dâhil edildi. 240 hasta HPV16/18 pozitif grupta olup; 290 hasta da diğer yr-HPV pozitif grupta sınıflandırıldı. Yaş, gravida, vücut kitle indeksi, sigara kullanımı, alkol kullanımı ve sistemik hastalık varlığı açısından gruplar arasında farklılık saptanmadı p=0.832, p=0.785, p:0.852, p=0.812, p=0.792 ve p=0.880, sırasıyla . LGSIL ve HGSIL oranı HPV16/18 grubunda, diğer yr-HPV grubuna oranla anlamlı derecede yüksek saptadı p=0.001,p=0.001,sırasıyla . HPV16/18 grubunda LGSIL oranı %25.8 ve HGSIL oranı %25.4 olarak tespit edildi. Oranlar her ne kadar HPV16/18 grubundaki kadar olmasa da diğer grupta LGSIL oranı %19.6 ve HGSIL oranı %12.4 idi. Servisit oranı diğer yr-HPV grubunda, HPV16/18 grubuna oranla yüksek saptandı p=0.001 . Serviks kanseri her iki grupta 1’er hastada tespit edildi.Sonuç: Diğer yr-HPV pozitifliğinin, her ne kadar HPV16/18 kadar olmasa da, servikal prekanseröz lezyonlar ve servikal kanser ile ilişkili olduğunu ve mevcut hastalar için kolposkopik incelemenin uygun bir yaklaşım olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus, LGSIL, HGSIL, servikal kanser

References

• Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal rela- tion between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J ClinPathol 2002;55:244-65.
• Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Globocan 2010 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10. Lyon, France: IARC; 2014.
• Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2011;61:69-90.
• Dehn D, Torkko KC, Shroyer KR. Human papillomavirus testing and mo- lecula rmarkers of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma. Cancer 2007;111: 1-12.
• De Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, Lloveras B et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1048-56.
• Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, Davey DD, Goulart RA, Garcia, FA et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical can- cer screening: interim clinical guidance. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136:178.
• Einstein MH, Garcia FA, Mitchell AL, Day SP. Age-stratified performance of the Cervista HPV 16/18 genotyping test in women with ASC-US cyto- logy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:1185-89.
• Castellsagué X. Natural history and epidemiology of HPV infection and cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;110:4-7
• Bansal N, Wright JD, Cohen CJ, Herzog TJ. Natural history of establis- hed low grade cervical intraepithelial (CIN 1) lesions. Anti Cancer Res 2008;28:1763-66.
• Chan JK, Monk BJ, Brewer C, et al. HPV infection and number of life time sexual partners are strong predictors for ‘natural’ regression of CIN 2 and 3. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1062.
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin number 66, September 2005. Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:645.
• Gustafsson L, Adami HO. Natural history of cervical neoplasia: con- sistent results obtained by an identification technique. Br J Cancer 1989;60:132.
• Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004;364:249-56.
• McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohor tstudy. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:425-34.