BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Between The Right and Left Hips in Postmenopausal Women

Year 2014, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 37 - 40, 01.04.2014

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate diffrences in bone mineral density BMD between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women. Material and Methods: This wasa retrospective dual energy X- ray absorptiometry DEXA scan reanalysis of 207 postmenopausal women ≥45 years who had scans of both hips and spine using Hologic DEXA systems at the menopause department of a tertiary research and education hospital between April and December in 2013. Bone status was determined by the lowest T score. Age, menopause duration, height cm , weight kg and body mass index BMI kg/m² were recorded.Results: Two hundred and seven women were enrolled in this study. The mean maternal age was 55.5±0.44 years old 45-71 .There were no significant differences between the neck and total BMD measurements of the right and left hips p=0.302 and p=0.367 .BMI didn’t have a significant influence on T score between right and left hips p>0.05 . The lowest T score was concordant between hips in a total of %79.7 of the women. In our study, %78 of womenin whom spine measurements were osteoporotic had femoral measurements that were normal. Conclusion: Unilateral femoral and spine BMD measurements are enough to determine osteoporotic patients.

References

  • 1. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 8th edition. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  • 2. Nuti R, Martini G, Gennari C. Total body, spine and femur dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53: 388-93.
  • 3. Avioli LV. Diagnostic Aids. Stevenson P. Clinician’s Manual on Osteoporosis, London, 2002: 23-31.
  • 4. Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Herd R et al. Spine and femur KMY by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52: 263-8.
  • 5. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection, Osteoporosis Int1992; 2:285
  • 6. WHO. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva WHO, 1994, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994; 843:1-129
  • 7. Delaney MF, Leboff SM. Metabolic Bone Disaese. In:Shaun R, Edward DH, Clement BS, eds. Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology. Philadelphia, 2001:1635-53.
  • 8. Micheal T. MC Dermott. Metabolic bone diseases.Sterling West. Rheumatology secrets. Philadelphia 2002: 374-383.
  • 9. Sindel D. Osteoporozda tanı yöntemleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2002; 2: 1: 17-27.
  • 10. Melton JL, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM et al. Long term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1227-33.
  • 12. Hwang HJ, Park SY, Lee SH, Han SB, Ro KH. Differences in Bone Mineral Density between the Right and Left Hips in Postmenopausal Women. J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27: 686–690.
  • 11. Jergas M, Genant HK. Spinal and femoral DXA for the assesment of spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int1997; 61: 351-7.
  • 13. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z. Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 1992; 2:274–278.
  • 14. R. Hamdy & G. M. Kiebzak & E. Seier & N. B. Watts. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17:1772–1780.
  • 15. Petley GW, Taylor PA, Murrills AJ, Dennison E, Pearson G, Cooper C. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11:675–679
  • 16. MounachA, Rezgi A, GhozlaniI, AchemlalL, BezzaA, Magraoui A. Prevalanceand Risk Factors of Discordance between Left- and Right-Hip Bone Mineral Density Using DXA. ISRN Rheumatol 2012; 2012: 617535.
  • 17. Mazess RB, Nord R, Hanson JA, Barden HS. Bilateral measurement of femoral bone mineral density. J Clin Densitom. 2000; 3:133–140
  • 18. Wong JC, McEwan L, Lee N, Griffiths MR, Pocock NA. The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in lowimpact fractures. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14:339–344.
  • 19. Prince RL, Price RI, Ho S. Forearm bone loss in hemiplegia: a model for the study of immobilization osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:305–310.
  • 20. Yalıman A, Oral A, Sindel D. DXA ile ölçülen lomber vertebra ve femur boyun kemik mineral yoğunlukları arasındaki osteoporoz tanısı açısından uyum. Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2001; 6:15-8.

Post Menopozal Kadınlarda Sağ Ve Sol Femur Kemik Mineral Yoğunluğu Arasındaki Farkın Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2014, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 37 - 40, 01.04.2014

Abstract

Amaç: Postmenopozal kadınlarda sağ ve sol femur ve lomber kemik mineral yoğunluğu KMY ölçümleri arasındaki farklılığı belirlemek. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi menopoz polikliniğine 2013 Nisan ve Aralık ayları arasında başvuran, 45 yaş üzeri 207 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaşı, menopoz süresi, boy ve kilosu, vücut kitle indeksleri VKI ve menarş yaşı kaydedildi. Çalışmaya alınan hastaların L1-4 ve total lomber, femur boyun ve total femur kemik mineral yoğunlukları Hologic Discovery C dual enerji X ray absorptiyometri sistemi kullanılarak ölçüldü. KMYyorumu en düşük T skoruna göre yapıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza katılan 207 hastanın yaş ortalaması 55.5 ± 0.44 yıl 45-71 olarak bulundu. Bu olguların sağ ve sol femur boyun bölgesi ve total KMY ölçümleri arasında anlamlı fark izlenmedi p=0.362 ve p=0.367 . Belirtilen VKI gruplarında sağ ve sol femur KMY ölçümleri arasında farklılık gösterilememiştir p>0.05 . WHO sınıflandırmasına göre her iki femur en düşük T skorları arasındaki konkordans incelendiğinde %79.7 olguda uyum bulunmuştur. Femur bölgesinde yapılan KMY ölçümlerine göre osteoporoz düşünülmeyen hastaların %78’i lomber bölge T skorlarına göre osteoporoz tanısı almıştır. Sonuç: Unilateral femur ve lumbar KMY ölçümü osteoporoz tanısı için yeterli görülmektedir.

References

  • 1. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 8th edition. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  • 2. Nuti R, Martini G, Gennari C. Total body, spine and femur dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53: 388-93.
  • 3. Avioli LV. Diagnostic Aids. Stevenson P. Clinician’s Manual on Osteoporosis, London, 2002: 23-31.
  • 4. Ryan PJ, Blake GM, Herd R et al. Spine and femur KMY by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 52: 263-8.
  • 5. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection, Osteoporosis Int1992; 2:285
  • 6. WHO. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva WHO, 1994, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994; 843:1-129
  • 7. Delaney MF, Leboff SM. Metabolic Bone Disaese. In:Shaun R, Edward DH, Clement BS, eds. Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology. Philadelphia, 2001:1635-53.
  • 8. Micheal T. MC Dermott. Metabolic bone diseases.Sterling West. Rheumatology secrets. Philadelphia 2002: 374-383.
  • 9. Sindel D. Osteoporozda tanı yöntemleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2002; 2: 1: 17-27.
  • 10. Melton JL, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM et al. Long term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:1227-33.
  • 12. Hwang HJ, Park SY, Lee SH, Han SB, Ro KH. Differences in Bone Mineral Density between the Right and Left Hips in Postmenopausal Women. J Korean Med Sci 2012; 27: 686–690.
  • 11. Jergas M, Genant HK. Spinal and femoral DXA for the assesment of spinal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int1997; 61: 351-7.
  • 13. Lilley J, Walters BG, Heath DA, Drolc Z. Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 1992; 2:274–278.
  • 14. R. Hamdy & G. M. Kiebzak & E. Seier & N. B. Watts. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17:1772–1780.
  • 15. Petley GW, Taylor PA, Murrills AJ, Dennison E, Pearson G, Cooper C. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11:675–679
  • 16. MounachA, Rezgi A, GhozlaniI, AchemlalL, BezzaA, Magraoui A. Prevalanceand Risk Factors of Discordance between Left- and Right-Hip Bone Mineral Density Using DXA. ISRN Rheumatol 2012; 2012: 617535.
  • 17. Mazess RB, Nord R, Hanson JA, Barden HS. Bilateral measurement of femoral bone mineral density. J Clin Densitom. 2000; 3:133–140
  • 18. Wong JC, McEwan L, Lee N, Griffiths MR, Pocock NA. The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in lowimpact fractures. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14:339–344.
  • 19. Prince RL, Price RI, Ho S. Forearm bone loss in hemiplegia: a model for the study of immobilization osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:305–310.
  • 20. Yalıman A, Oral A, Sindel D. DXA ile ölçülen lomber vertebra ve femur boyun kemik mineral yoğunlukları arasındaki osteoporoz tanısı açısından uyum. Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2001; 6:15-8.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Runa Özelçi This is me

Berna Dilbaz This is me

Derya Akdağ Cırık This is me

Tuğba Zengin This is me

Pervin Demir This is me

Berrin Yeğenoğlu This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Cite

Vancouver Özelçi R, Dilbaz B, Akdağ Cırık D, Zengin T, Demir P, Yeğenoğlu B. Post Menopozal Kadınlarda Sağ Ve Sol Femur Kemik Mineral Yoğunluğu Arasındaki Farkın Değerlendirilmesi. JGON. 2014;11(2):37-40.