Fiziksel Aktivite Değerlendirmesi: Subjektif ve Objektif Yöntemler

Year 2021, , 53 - 60, 30.09.2021

İsmet Tümtürk , Fatih Özden , Mehmet Özkeskin

https://doi.org/10.29228/JOHSE.12

Abstract

Fiziksel aktivite genel sağlık durumu ile ilişkili önemli bir parametredir. Son zamanlarda, karantina önlemlerinin alındığı Covid-19 pandemisi sebebiyle artan bir fiziksel inaktivite eğilimi söz konusudur. Fiziksel aktivitenin çeşitli bulaşıcı olmayan kronik hastalıkları önlediği, Covid-19 hastalığında sağ kalım oranlarını yükselttiği, hastalık sonrası genel iyilik halini koruduğu ve genel sağlık düzeyini artırarak yaşam kalitesine büyük katkı sağladığı yadsınamaz bir gerçektir. Bu sebeplerden dolayı fiziksel aktivitenin değerlendirilmesi de büyük önem arz etmektedir. Birçok objektif ve subjektif fiziksel değerlendirme yönteminin olması, bu yöntemlerin protokolleri, avantaj ve dezavantajlarını detaylı irdelenme ihtiyacı oluşturmaktadır. Fiziksel aktivite değerlendirmesinin güncel ve kapsamlı bir literatür derlenmesi ile ele alınması, klinisyenlerde oluşabilecek bazı kafa karışıklıklarının ve değerlendirme yöntemi ile ilgili seçim zorluklarının üstesinden gelinmesini mümkün kılacaktır.

Keywords

Anket, Covid-19, fiziksel aktivite, sensör

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

-

Thanks

Yok

Physical Activity Assessment: Subjective and Objective Methods

Abstract

Physical activity is an essential parameter associated with general health status. Recently, there has been an increasing trend of physical inactivity due to the Covid-19 pandemic, where quarantine measures have been taken. It is an undeniable fact that physical activity prevents various non-communicable chronic diseases, increases survival rates in Covid-19 disease, maintains general well-being after illness, and contributes significantly to the quality of life by increasing the general health level. For these reasons, the evaluation of physical activity is also of great importance. Many objective and subjective physical evaluation methods led to the need for examination in detail; the protocols, advantages and disadvantages detail. Addressing physical activity assessment with a current and comprehensive literature review will make it possible to overcome some of the confusions that may occur in clinicians and the selection difficulties related to the assessment method.

Keywords

Questionnaire, Covid-19, physical activity, sensor

Project Number

-

References

• Dishman RK, Heath GW, Schmidt MD, Lee IM. Physical Activity Epidemiology. 3th ed. [Internet]. USA: Human Kinetics; 2021. 1-10 p. Available from: https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=nQgiEAAAQBAJ&lpg=PR1&ots=g06kClgCrt&dq=Physical%20Activity%20Epidemiology%3A%20Human%20Kinetics&lr&hl=tr&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q=Physical%20Activity%20Epidemiology:%20Human%20Kinetics&f=false
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: at a glance. Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014886
• Woessner MN, Tacey A, Levinger-Limor A, Parker AG, Levinger P, Levinger I. The Evolution of Technology and Physical Inactivity: The Good, the Bad, and the Way Forward. Front. Public Health. 2021;9:672.
• Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Reflections on Physical Activity and Health: What Should We Recommend? Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(4):495-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.024.
• Kandola A, Ashdown-Franks G, Hendrikse J, Sabiston CM, Stubbs B. Physical activity and depression: Towards understanding the antidepressant mechanisms of physical activity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;107:525-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.040.
• Feter N, Mielke GI, Leite JS, Brown WJ, Coombes JS, Rombaldi AJ. Physical activity in later life and risk of dementia: Findings from a population-based cohort study. Exp Gerontol. 2021;143:111145. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111145.
• Amini H, Isanejad A, Chamani N, Movahedi-Fard F, Salimi F, Moezi M, et al. Physical activity during COVID-19 pandemic in the Iranian population: A brief report. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05411. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05411.
• Brailovskaia J, Cosci F, Mansueto G, Miragall M, Herrero R, Baños RM, et al. The association between depression symptoms, psychological burden caused by Covid-19 and physical activity: An investigation in Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain. Psychiatry Res. 2021;295:113596. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113596.
• Cunningham GB. Physical activity and its relationship with COVID-19 cases and deaths: Analysis of U.S. counties. J Sport Health Sci. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.03.008.
• Ainsworth B, Cahalin L, Buman M, Ross R. The Current State of Physical Activity Assessment Tools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):387-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.005.
• Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278-84.
• Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):755-62. Epub 2007/01/02. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005898.
• Savci, S., Öztürk, M., Arikan, H., İnal İnce, Deniz, & Tokgözoğlu, L. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars, 2006;34(3):166-72.
• Çırak Y, Yılmaz GD, Demir YP, Dalkılınç M, Yaman S. Pregnancy physical activity questionnaire (PPAQ): reliability and validity of Turkish version. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12):3703-9.
• Tosun OC, Solmaz U, Ekin A, Tosun G, Mutlu EK, Okyay E, et al. The Turkish version of the pregnancy physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3215-21.
• Chasan-Taber L, Schmidt MD, Roberts DE, Hosmer D, Markenson G, Freedson PS. Development and validation of a pregnancy physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(10):1750-60.
• Erdim L, Ergün A, Kuğuoğlu S. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(1):162-9.
• Crocker PRE, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Kowalski KC, Mcgrath R. Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(10):1344-9.
• Kowalski KC, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA. Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1997;9(2):174-86.
• Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): Evidence for Validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(7):643-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00049-9.
• Ayvat E, Kilinc M, Kirdi N. The Turkish version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): its cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(3):908-15.
• Aydoğan Arslan S, Abit Kocaman A, Sertel M, Önal B, Düger T, Demirgüç A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lasa Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ). Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 43(4):341- 348.
• Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SMF, Visser M, Deeg DJH, Lips P. Comparison of the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(3):252-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.008.
• Armstrong T, Bull F. Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J Public Health. 2006;14(2):66-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x.
• Herrmann SD, Heumann KJ, Der Ananian CA, Ainsworth BE. Validity and Reliability of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2013;17(3):221-35. DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2013.805139.
• Özkeskin M, Özden F. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). J Basic Clin Health Sci. 2021;5(2):124-33.
• Finger JD, Tafforeau J, Gisle L, Oja L, Ziese T, Thelen J, et al. Development of the European health interview survey-physical activity questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ) to monitor physical activity in the European Union. Arch Belg. 2015;73(1):1-11.
• Baumeister SE, Ricci C, Kohler S, Fischer B, Töpfer C, Finger JD, et al. Physical activity surveillance in the European Union: reliability and validity of the European health interview survey-physical activity questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):1-10.
• Wickel EE, Welk GJ, Eisenmann JC. Concurrent validation of the Bouchard Diary with an accelerometry-based monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(2):373-9. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000183344.46077.bb.
• Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Lortie G, Savard R, Thériault G. A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37(3):461-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/37.3.461.
• Martínez-Gómez D, Wärnberg J, Welk GJ, Sjöström M, Veiga OL, Marcos A. Validity of the Bouchard activity diary in Spanish adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(2):261-8. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980009990681.
• Monteiro M, Maso I, Sasaki AC, Barreto Neto N, Oliveira Filho J, Pinto EB. Validation of the Frenchay activity index on stroke victims. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017;75(3):167-71.
• Martins JC, Aguiar LT, Nadeau S, Scianni AA, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Faria CDCDM. Measurement properties of self-report physical activity assessment tools for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(6):476-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.004.
• Fix AJ, Daughton D. Human activity profile: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988. 25 p.
• Daskapan A, Kurtoglu F, Kilic F, Karakas F, Ozdemir F. The evaluation of physical activity levels in Turkish dialysis patients. Ann Med Res. 2018;25(4):689-94.
• Bastone AdC, Moreira BdS, Vieira RA, Kirkwood RN, Dias JoMD, Dias RnCa. Validation of the Human Activity Profile Questionnaire as a Measure of Physical Activity Levels in Older Community-Dwelling Women. J Aging Phys Act. 2014;22(3):348. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2012-0283.
• Taylor-Piliae RE, Norton LC, Haskell WL, Mahbouda MH, Fair JM, Iribarren C, et al. Validation of a New Brief Physical Activity Survey among Men and Women Aged 60–69 Years. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(6):598-606. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj248.
• Bratteby LE, Sandhagen B, Fan H, Samuelson G. A 7-day activity diary for assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labelled water method in adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51(9):585-91. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600449.
• C. rush E, Valencia ME, Plank LD. Validation of a 7-day physical activity diary against doubly-labelled water. Ann Hum Biol. 2008;35(4):416-21. DOI: 10.1080/03014460802089825.
• Tolley APL, Ramsey KA, Rojer AGM, Reijnierse EM, Maier AB. Objectively measured physical activity is associated with frailty in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;137:218-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.009.
• Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):56. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.
• Doherty A, Jackson D, Hammerla N, Plötz T, Olivier P, Granat MH, et al. Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0169649.
• Hildebrand M, Van Hees VT, Hansen BH, Ekelund U. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1816-24. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000289.
• Arvidsson D, Fridolfsson J, Börjesson M. Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice using accelerometers. J Intern Med. 2019;286(2):137-53. DOI: 10.1111/joim.12908.
• Voss C, Harris KC. Physical activity evaluation in children with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2017;103(18):1408-12. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311340.
• Can S. Fiziksel Aktivite Ölçümü: Objektif ve Sübjektif Yöntemler. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2019;54(4):296-307.
• Alarie N, Kent L. Chapter 34 - Physical Activity Assessment and Impact. In: Watson RR, editor. Diet and Exercise in Cystic Fibrosis. Boston: Academic Press; 2015. 299-306 p.
• Corder K, Ekelund U, Steele RM, Wareham NJ, Brage S. Assessment of physical activity in youth. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(3):977-87. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2008.
• Speakman JR, Yamada Y, Sagayama H, Berman ESF, Ainslie PN, Andersen LF, et al. A standard calculation methodology for human doubly labeled water studies. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(2):100203. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100203.
• Berggren G, Christensen EH. Heart rate and body temperature as indices of metabolic rate during work. Arbeitsphysiologie. 1950;14(3):255-60. DOI: 10.1007/BF00933843.
• Ceesay SM, Prentice AM, Day KC, Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Scott W. The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expenditure: A validation study using indirect whole-body calorimetry. Br J Nutr. 1989;61(2):175-86. DOI: 10.1079/BJN19890107.
• Westerterp KR. Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;105(6):823-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1000-2.
• Armstrong N. Young people's physical activity patterns as assessed by heart rate monitoring. J Sports Sci. 1998;16(sup1):9-16. DOI: 10.1080/026404198366632.
• Freedson PS, Miller K. Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(sup2):21-9.
• Dishman RK, Washburn RA, Schoeller DA. Measurement of Physical Activity. Quest. 2001;53(3):295-309. DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2001.10491746.