Research Article

A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism

Volume: 6 Number: 2 June 30, 2025
EN

A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism

Abstract

This paper focuses on the growing importance of augmented reality technology, especially in the case of applications of virtual tours in relation to cultural heritage and tourism. Augmented reality superimposes digital information on the real world, enhancing users' experiences with interactive and educative ways of exploring cultural destinations. The paper discusses three different case studies: the Taiwan Lantern Festival, the Institute of Contemporary Art San Diego, and the Singapore Tourism Board. These cases demonstrate how augmented reality, often through the use of virtual mascots, can be integrated into various cultural and geographical contexts to achieve a variety of goals. This article provides an overview of the development of AR, its access through any common device, and its potential for disrupting cultural tourism. This study tries to analyze how AR-based virtual guide applications perform through case studies of these cases and categorizes various methods and tools used in applications.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No funding was received for this research, and there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement

No need ethical committee approval. All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization, data collection, analysis, and writing of this paper.

Thanks

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all researchers and industry professionals whose studies and technological innovations contributed to this research.

References

  1. Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature, Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  2. Akkuş, G. & Akkuş Ç. (2018). Tarihi turistik alanlarda kullanılan mobil artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of the mobile augmented reality applications used in historical tourist attractions). Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 6(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2018.176
  3. Altınpulluk, H., & Kesim, M., (2015). Geçmişten Günümüze Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamalarında Gerçekleşen Paradigma Değişimleri. (Paradigm shifts in augmented reality applications from past to present.) Akademik Bilişim 2015 (pp.546-551). Eskişehir, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3721.2967
  4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  5. Azuma, R.T. (1999). The challenge of making augmented reality work outdoors. Mixed reality: Merging real and virtual worlds, 1, 379-390.
  6. Azuma, R. T., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., and MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
  7. Bağçı, E. & İçöz, O. (2019). Z ve Alfa kuşağı ile dijitalleşen turizm (Digitalization of tourism with generation Z and Alpha). Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 232-256. https://doi.org/10.32572/guntad.578926
  8. Batuhan, T. (2024). Müze ve telefon uygulamaları (Museum and mobile applications). 26. Orta Çağ ve Türk Dönemi Kazıları ve Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları Kitabı. Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başkanlığı.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Visual Communication Design (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

May 24, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

February 1, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Yücebaş, Z. F., & Toy, E. (2025). A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, 6(2), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15510369
AMA
1.Yücebaş ZF, Toy E. A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism. JIAE. 2025;6(2):71-88. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15510369
Chicago
Yücebaş, Zeynep Feyza, and Ertan Toy. 2025. “A Comparative Analysis of Augmented Reality Supported Virtual Guides in Cultural Heritage Tourism”. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education 6 (2): 71-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15510369.
EndNote
Yücebaş ZF, Toy E (June 1, 2025) A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education 6 2 71–88.
IEEE
[1]Z. F. Yücebaş and E. Toy, “A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism”, JIAE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 71–88, June 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15510369.
ISNAD
Yücebaş, Zeynep Feyza - Toy, Ertan. “A Comparative Analysis of Augmented Reality Supported Virtual Guides in Cultural Heritage Tourism”. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education 6/2 (June 1, 2025): 71-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15510369.
JAMA
1.Yücebaş ZF, Toy E. A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism. JIAE. 2025;6:71–88.
MLA
Yücebaş, Zeynep Feyza, and Ertan Toy. “A Comparative Analysis of Augmented Reality Supported Virtual Guides in Cultural Heritage Tourism”. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, vol. 6, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 71-88, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15510369.
Vancouver
1.Zeynep Feyza Yücebaş, Ertan Toy. A comparative analysis of augmented reality supported virtual guides in cultural heritage tourism. JIAE. 2025 Jun. 1;6(2):71-88. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15510369
Authors are required to respond to editorial emails within 3 days to avoid any disruption to the editorial process.