Opinions of music students about the effective use of music software: a case study

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 175 - 190, 30.12.2023

Alper Şakalar , Serap Yağmur İlhan

Abstract

Music software is a digital tool that supports and facilitates musical creativity, performance and production. This study aims to reveal the opinions and experiences of students who receive music education at universities about music software. The research was designed with qualitative methods and conducted with a case study pattern. In the study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 104 students selected from different universities in Turkey. The interviews included questions about the content, duration and frequency of the courses related to music software, the access and usage status of the software, the contributions of the software to musical creativity and other courses, the role of the software in future music production and the problems they encountered in this field. The data were collected with observation notes and semi-structured interviews and coded with MAXQDA24 qualitative data analysis software and analyzed with thematic analysis method. The findings were presented with visual tools such as cross table and matrix and supported by quantitative data. As a result of the data analysis, it was determined that the number and duration of the courses related to music software were insufficient, the students encountered various difficulties in accessing the software and many students did not actively use these software. In addition, the students stated that music software improved their musical creativity and contributed to their other courses. Moreover, opinions were expressed that music software will play an important role in future music production. The students also emphasized that music software has an important place in education and profession, but adequate resources and support are not provided in this field. This study reveals the current situation regarding the effective use of music software and identifies the problems encountered in this regard. The results of the research were discussed by comparing with the literature and some suggestions were presented for future studies.

Keywords

music software, music, music technology, music learning

Ethical Statement

Prior to commencing the data collection phase, ethical approval was obtained from the KSU Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee in the session held on 12.07.2023, under the protocol number 2023-26.

Supporting Institution

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University

Thanks

We would like to thank all the students who participated in the research and the experts who contributed to our research with their expert opinions.

References

• Arapgirlioğlu, H. (2003). Music technology and music education in the new century. Symposium on Music Education in the 80th Anniversary of Our Republic, İnönü University Faculty of Education GSEB-MEABD, Malatya.
• Chadabe, J. (1997). Electric sound. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Cheng, H.K., Sims, R. R., & Teegen, H. (1997). To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 49-60.
• Clarke, J. M. (2009). L’Après MIDI: A vision of music and technology in the 21st century. Contemporary Music Review, 15(3-4), 57-61.
• Clauhs, M., Franco, B., & Cremata, R. (2019). Mixing it up: Sound recording and music production in school music programs. Music Educators Journal, 106(1), 55-63.
• Crowe, S., Cresswell, K.M., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A.J., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
• Doğan, S. (2019). An evaluation of clarinet lessons given in music education institutions at undergraduate level in Turkey. Master’s Thesis. Malatya, Turkey: İnönü University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
• Doi, C. (2016). Applying the flipped classroom methodology in a first-year undergraduate music research methods course. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 19(2), 114-135.
• Everts, R., Berkers, P., & Hitters, E. (2022). Milestones in music: Reputations in the career building of musicians in the changing Dutch music industry. Poetics, 92, 101647.
• Hindle, A. (2019). Complexity: Let’s not make this complicated. IEEE Software, 36(2), 130-132.
• Ho, W. C. (2004). Use of information technology and music learning in the search for quality education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 57-67.
• Holmes, T. (2012). Electronic and experimental music: Technology, music, and culture. Routledge.
• Houghton, C., Murphy, K., Shaw, D., & Casey, D. (2015). Qualitative case study data analysis: an example from practice. Nurse Researcher, 22(5), 8–12. doi:10.7748/nr.22.5.8.e1307
• Karaönçel, F. (2019). An examination on applications supported by music software in music education. İdil Journal of Art and Language, 8(56), 463-472.
• Kasap, T. B. (2007). Technological approaches in music education. In International Congress on Studies in Asia and North Africa, Ankara. (pp. 447-454).
• Keyzer, D.M. (2000). Nursing research in practice: the case study revisited. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 8(5), 266-270.
• Lankshear, C.J., & Knobel, M. (2008). Introduction: Digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang Publishing.
• Lerch, A. (2018). The Relation Between Music Technology and Music Industry. In: Bader, R. (eds) Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55004-5_44
• Levendoğlu, O. (2004). Technology supported contemporary music education. Symposium on Music Teacher Training from the Musiki Muallim Mektebi to Today in the 80th Anniversary of Our Republic, Isparta.
• Ley B. (2004). Using music technology. In A.Paterson & B.Ley (Eds.), Ideas in—Music out: Using technology in music education (pp.2–3). Matlock England: National Association of Music Educators.
• Maba, A. (2020). Computer-aided music education and musical creativity. Journal of Human Sciences, 17(3), 822-830.
• McClellan, E. (2017). A social-cognitive theoretical framework for examining music teacher identity. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 16(2), 65-101. https://doi.org/10.22176/act16.2.65
• Moore, B. (1991). Technology-a resource providing new ways for music educators. New ways in Music Education. Grand Rapids MI: Yamaha Corporation of America.
• Mumma, G., Rye H., Kernfeld B., & Sheridan C. (2003). Recording. Oxford University Press Grove Music Online. Web: http://www.oxfordmusiconline. com:80/subscriber/article/grove/music/J371600 (Access Date:29 .09 .2023).
• Nart, S. (2016). Music software in the technology integrated music Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 78-84.
• Nevels, D. (2013). Using music software in the compositional process: a case study of electronic music composition. Journal of Music Technology and Education, 5(3), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.5.3.257_1
• Özdemir, O. (2017). The situation and competencies of using technology oriented instructional materials by educators who teach musical hearing reading and writing course. Afyon Kocatepe University Academic Music Research Journal, 3(6)33-49.
• Pontin, D. (2000). Observation. In Cormack D (Ed)The Research Process in Nursing. Fourth edition. Blackwell Publishing Oxford.
• Rouse, M. (2005) ICT (Information and Communications Technology). http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/ICT-information-and-communications-technology-or-technologies
• Ruismäki, H., & Juvonen, A. (2009). The new horizons for music technology in music education. The Changing Face of Music Education. Music and Environment, 98-104.
• Rudolph TJ., Richmond F., Mash D., Williams D. (2002). Technology Strategies for Music Education. 2nd ed. Milwaukee WI: Hal Leonard Publishing Co.
• Sibelius. (2023). What’s New in Sibelius. https://www.avid.com/resource-center/whats-new-in-sibelius
• Steinberg Cubase 12 Pro. (2023 September 6). Explore Cubase 12 with Free Demo Projects | Steinberg. https://ocl-steinberg-live.Steinberg.Net/_storage/asset/154143/storage/PNG_extra-large_5500px/154143-extra-large.Png
• Super D. & Jordaan J. P. (1973). Career development theory. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 1(1)3-16.
• Thompson D. E. (2012). Music Technology and Musical Creativity: Making Connections. General Music Today, 25(3), 54-57.
• Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170
• Tuckman, B. W. (1974). An age-graded model for career development education. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4(2), 193-212
• Watson, S. (2011). Using technology to unlock musical creativity. OUP USA, Oxford University Press.
• Webster, P. R. (2012). Key research in music technology and music teaching and learning. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 4(2-3), 115-130.
• Wise, S., Greenwood, J., & Davis, N. (2011). Teachers’ use of digital technology in secondary music education: illustrations of changing classrooms. British Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 117-134.