Integration of design and entrepreneurship: a proposal for innovative educational models

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 23 - 38

Duygu Sezgin

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15074898

Abstract

This study examines the integration of design and entrepreneurship education, highlighting its role in enhancing creativity, fostering innovation, and bridging academic learning with real-world application. Design education focuses on user-centered approaches, aesthetics, and functionality, while entrepreneurship translates creative solutions into market-ready outcomes. The study showcases how merging these disciplines prepares students for leadership roles and equips them to address socio-economic challenges. Based on a doctoral dissertation, the research presents the "Design and Entrepreneurship" course, implemented for three years at Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University's Fine Arts Faculty Graphic Design Department. The 16-week curriculum develops entrepreneurial skills such as problem identification, business model creation, SWOT analysis, customer profiling, and moodboard preparation, all integrated with design principles. The model emphasizes iterative processes like prototyping, testing, and feedback. Using a mixed-method approach, data from surveys, chronological records, and classroom observations were analyzed. The results indicate that this interdisciplinary approach enhances creative and entrepreneurial competencies, fostering innovative, market-oriented solutions. Applied learning environments proved effective in promoting collaboration and equipping students with practical industry skills. The study underscores the importance of integrating entrepreneurship into design curricula to meet industry demands, enabling students to merge creativity with business acumen. It advocates for adapting this model across various art and design disciplines, fostering innovation and bridging gaps between theory and practice. The model's three-year sustainability demonstrates its scalability for professional success. In summary, integrating design and entrepreneurship education offers a transformative framework that prepares students to address both creative and socio-economic challenges, providing a solid foundation for interdisciplinary curriculum development.

Keywords

Design education, Entrepreneurship, Interdisciplinary learning

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles to ensure the integrity and transparency of the research process.

Supporting Institution

Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University

Thanks

I extend my heartfelt thanks to Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University and my students for providing the necessary academic environment and support during this study.

References

• Balaban, Ö., & Özdemir, Y. (2008). Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği (The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Tendency: The Case of Sakarya University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences). Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi 3(2), 133-148
• Becer, E. (1997). İletişim ve grafik tasarım (Communication and graphic design). Dost Publishing.
• Blinks, M., & Vale, P. (1990). Entrepreneurship and economic change. London: McGraw-Hill.
• British Design Council. (2004). Framework for Innovation. Retrieved in December 2024 from designcouncil.org: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/
• Cantillon, R. (1990). An essay on economic theory. Alabama. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
• Çetin, M. (2007). Bölgesel kalkınma ve girişimci üniversiteler (regional development and entrepreneurial universities) Ege Akademik Bakış, 7(1), 217-238.
• Çetinkaya, Ö. B. (2011). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de girişimcilik eğitimi: başarılı girişimciler ve öğretim üyelerinden önerileriler (Entrepreneurship education in the world and Turkey: recommendations from successful entrepreneurs and academicians). Detay.
• DCMS. (2001). The Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: DCMS.
• Erkmen, N. (2009). Bauhaus ve Marmara Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi: Modernleşmenin Tasarımı. (Bauhaus and Marmara University Faculty of Fine Arts: The Design of Modernization). İletişim.
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Implications for Policy and Evaluation. Stockholm: Science Policy Institute.
• Fetters, M. L., Greene, P. G., Rice, M. P., & Butler, J. S. (2010). The Development Of University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: Global Practices. Edward Elgar.
• Güney, S. (2008). Girişimcilik Temel kavramlar ve bazı güncel konular (Entrepreneurship: fundamental concepts and contemporary issues). Siyasal.
• Heller, S., & Talarico, L. (2011). An Education Manifestofor Icograda. Icograda Design Education Manifesto 2011 (p. 84).
• Icograda. (2012, Temmuz). Icograda 2011 Tasarım Eğitimi Manifestosu (Icograda 2011 Design Education Manifesto) (118).
• Kalay, Y. E. (1985). Redefining The role of computers in architecture: from drafting/modelling tools to knowledge-based design assistants. Computer-Aided Design.
• Kiper, M. (2010). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği ve Bu Kapsamda Üniversite-Sanayi Ortak Araştırma Merkezleri Programı (ÜSAMP) (University-Industry Collaboration in the World and Turkey and the University-Industry Joint Research Centers Program (ÜSAMP)). Ankara: Türkiye Teknoloji Geliştirme Vakfı (Turkey Technology Development Foundation).
• Özgül, E. (2019). Girişimcilikte temel kavramlar. girişimcilik el kitabı (fundamental concepts in entrepreneurship. entrepreneurship supplementary textbook) (p. 5). İstanbul: KOSGEB.
• Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does Entrepreneurship education really work? a review and methodological critique of theempirical literature on the effects of university-basedentrepreneurship education. Journal of
• Small Business Management, 51(3), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12021
• Salur, N. (2021). Londra'ya açılan şirketin kurucusu Nazım Salur, geliştirdiği teknoloji modeli ve eleştiriler için ne diyor? (What does Nazım Salur, the founder of the company expanding to London, say about the developed technology model and the criticisms?) Retrieved in December 2024 from cumhuriyet.com: https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/getir-londraya-acilan-sirketin-kurucusu-nazim-salur-gelistirdigi-teknoloji-modeli-ve-elestiriler-icin-ne-diyor-1812430
• Schumpeter, A. J. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unvin. Seçilmiş, E. İ. (2015). Türkiye’de yaratıcı endüstrilerin kümelenmesi (the clustering of creative industries in Turkey.) Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2015117995
• Stevenson, H. H., & Gumbert, D. E. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 63, 85-94.
• Tosunoğlu, T. B., Ürper, Y., & Başar, M. (2013). Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerde girişimcilik. (entrepreneurship in developed and developing countries) (p. 139). Anadolu University Publishing.
• Yalçıntaş, M. (2010). Çağımızda girişimcilik (entrepreneurship in our era). Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(1), 95-98. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/girkal/issue/45195/565961
• Visual Bibliography Figure 1. The Double Diamond model, developed by the British Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/