Review Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tangible cultural heritage examples from Konya Hacı Fettah Cemetery: a study on the writing and form features of gravestones

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 195 - 210, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16948042

Abstract

Gravestones are extremely important, both artistically and as historical documents. Tombstone culture has persisted in Turkish-Islamic art from the Karakhanids to the Ottomans. Gravestones, which have a three-dimensional feature, are not only a personal structure but also have a social place. Information or an ornamental element on a tombstone sheds light on the art, socio-cultural situation, history, economy, and important events of the period. Each tombstone of such importance is put under scrutiny, with none of it being overlooked. Since Hacı Fettah Cemetery is vast, areas that have not been studied sufficiently were included in the scope of the research. Historical gravestones on islands 101, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 116 in the cemetery were examined. The examined gravestones are 3 on the 101st island, 4 on the 102nd island, 5 on the 104th island, 1 on the 106th island, 3 on the 108th island, 1 on the 110th island, and 2 on the 116th island. The study adopts an on-site observational approach supported by photographic documentation and physical measurement. The analysis is structured under the headings of Artifact Review, Evaluation, and Conclusion, following a chronological and thematic classification. A total of 19 tombstones on these islands were photographed. The width, length, and thickness measurements of the gravestones were taken. The inscription texts of the stones were written and recorded in both Ottoman Turkish and modern Turkish. The content of the inscriptions was analyzed. The names of dynasties, titles, hometowns, professions, and details of death in the inscription texts on the tombstone have been identified. These dynasty names extracted from the inscriptions are significant in terms of shedding light on past periods and providing information to subsequent generations. The gravestones were evaluated in terms of material, technique, form, and decoration. All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.

Ethical Statement

All processes of the research were carried out within the framework of ethical principles, and there were no ethical violations such as plagiarism, forgery, distortion, re-publication, or slicing in the study. This study is not subject to ethics committee approval because it does not involve human or animal subjects and only documents and analyzes movable cultural assets.

Supporting Institution

The author declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • Bastaban, Ü. (2024). Kolektif farkındalığın geliştirilmesinde sanatın rolü (The Role of Art in Developing Collective Awareness). Uluslararası İletişim ve Sanat Dergisi, 11, 172–192.
  • Berk, S. (2006). Zeytinburnu’nun tarihi mezar taşları: Zamanı aşan taşlar (The Historical Tombstones of Zeytinburnu: Stones Beyond Time). Zeytinburnu Belediyesi.
  • Bozkurt, N. (2004). Mezarlık (Cemetery). In İslam Ansiklopedisi (Vol. 29, pp. 519–522).
  • Çal, H. (1999). İstanbul Eyüp’teki erkek mezar taşlarında başlıklar (Headgear on Male Tombstones in Eyüp, Istanbul). In Tarihi Kültürü ve Sanatıyla III. Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu Tebliğler (pp. 206–225).
  • Çetinaslan, M. (2014). Taşların dili: İnegöl mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (The Language of Stones: Cemeteries and Tombstones in İnegöl). İnegöl Belediyesi.
  • Diyarbekirli, N. (1997). Türklerde mezar yapısı ve defin merasimleri (Grave Structures and Funeral Rituals among Turks). Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları, 28(1–2), 53–62.
  • Güzel, E. (2016). Osmanlı erkek mezar taşlarında serpuş biçimleri (Headgear Forms on Ottoman Male Tombstones) [Master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University].
  • Hanoğlu, C. (2015). Batılılaşma dönemi Rize mezar taşları (Tombstones from the Westernization Period in Rize) [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University].
  • Kara, H., & Şerife, D. (2005). Konya mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Cemeteries and Tombstones of Konya). Meram Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları.
  • Karaçağ, D. (1994). Bursa’daki 14–15. yüzyıl mezar taşları (14th–15th Century Tombstones in Bursa).
  • Karamağaralı, B. (1992). Ahlat mezar taşları (Ahlat Tombstones). Kültür Bakanlığı.
  • Kubbealtı Lugatı. (n.d.). Şahide. Retrieved May 9, 2024, from http://www.lugatim.com/s/%C5%9Fahide
  • The Qur’an. (n.d.). Al-Ma’idah 5:31. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.
  • Laqueur, H. P. (1997). Hüve’l Baki: İstanbul’da Osmanlı mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Huwa al-Baqi: Ottoman Cemeteries and Tombstones in Istanbul) (S. Dilidüzgün, Trans.).
  • Mezarlık Bilgi Sistemi. (2024, May 5). Konya cemetery database. https://konmeb.konya.bel.tr/#!/App/Mezarliklar
  • Ünlerşen, H. (2023). Karaman cami hazirelerinde ve Karaman Müzesi’nde bulunan mezar taşları (Tombstones in Mosque Courtyards and the Museum of Karaman) [Doctoral dissertation, Sosyal Bilgiler Enstitüsü].

Tangible cultural heritage examples from Konya Hacı Fettah Cemetery: a study on the writing and form features of gravestones

Year 2025, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 195 - 210, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16948042

Abstract

Gravestones are extremely important, both artistically and as historical documents. Tombstone culture has persisted in Turkish-Islamic art from the Karakhanids to the Ottomans. Gravestones, which have a three-dimensional feature, are not only a personal structure but also have a social place. Information or an ornamental element on a tombstone sheds light on the art, socio-cultural situation, history, economy, and important events of the period, like a projector. Each tombstone of such importance is put under scrutiny, with none of it being overlooked. Since Hacı Fettah Cemetery is vast, areas that have not been studied sufficiently were included in the scope of the research. Historical gravestones on islands 101, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 116 in the cemetery were examined. The examined gravestones are 3 on the 101st island, 4 on the 102nd island, 5 on the 104th island, 1 on the 106th island, 3 on the 108th island, 1 on the 110th island, and 2 on the 116th island. A total of 19 tombstones on these islands were photographed. The width, length, and thickness measurements of the gravestones were taken. The inscription texts of the stones were written and recorded in both Ottoman Turkish and modern Turkish. The content of the inscriptions was analyzed. The names of dynasties, titles, hometowns, professions, and details of death in the inscription texts on the tombstone have been identified. These dynasty names extracted from the inscriptions are significant in terms of shedding light on past periods and providing information to subsequent generations. The gravestones were evaluated in terms of material, technique, form, and decoration. All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.

Ethical Statement

All processes of the research were carried out within the framework of ethical principles, and there were no ethical violations such as plagiarism, forgery, distortion, re-publication, or slicing in the study. This study is not subject to ethics committee approval because it does not involve human or animal subjects and only documents and analyzes movable cultural assets.

Supporting Institution

The author declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • Bastaban, Ü. (2024). Kolektif farkındalığın geliştirilmesinde sanatın rolü (The Role of Art in Developing Collective Awareness). Uluslararası İletişim ve Sanat Dergisi, 11, 172–192.
  • Berk, S. (2006). Zeytinburnu’nun tarihi mezar taşları: Zamanı aşan taşlar (The Historical Tombstones of Zeytinburnu: Stones Beyond Time). Zeytinburnu Belediyesi.
  • Bozkurt, N. (2004). Mezarlık (Cemetery). In İslam Ansiklopedisi (Vol. 29, pp. 519–522).
  • Çal, H. (1999). İstanbul Eyüp’teki erkek mezar taşlarında başlıklar (Headgear on Male Tombstones in Eyüp, Istanbul). In Tarihi Kültürü ve Sanatıyla III. Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu Tebliğler (pp. 206–225).
  • Çetinaslan, M. (2014). Taşların dili: İnegöl mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (The Language of Stones: Cemeteries and Tombstones in İnegöl). İnegöl Belediyesi.
  • Diyarbekirli, N. (1997). Türklerde mezar yapısı ve defin merasimleri (Grave Structures and Funeral Rituals among Turks). Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları, 28(1–2), 53–62.
  • Güzel, E. (2016). Osmanlı erkek mezar taşlarında serpuş biçimleri (Headgear Forms on Ottoman Male Tombstones) [Master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University].
  • Hanoğlu, C. (2015). Batılılaşma dönemi Rize mezar taşları (Tombstones from the Westernization Period in Rize) [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University].
  • Kara, H., & Şerife, D. (2005). Konya mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Cemeteries and Tombstones of Konya). Meram Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları.
  • Karaçağ, D. (1994). Bursa’daki 14–15. yüzyıl mezar taşları (14th–15th Century Tombstones in Bursa).
  • Karamağaralı, B. (1992). Ahlat mezar taşları (Ahlat Tombstones). Kültür Bakanlığı.
  • Kubbealtı Lugatı. (n.d.). Şahide. Retrieved May 9, 2024, from http://www.lugatim.com/s/%C5%9Fahide
  • The Qur’an. (n.d.). Al-Ma’idah 5:31. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.
  • Laqueur, H. P. (1997). Hüve’l Baki: İstanbul’da Osmanlı mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Huwa al-Baqi: Ottoman Cemeteries and Tombstones in Istanbul) (S. Dilidüzgün, Trans.).
  • Mezarlık Bilgi Sistemi. (2024, May 5). Konya cemetery database. https://konmeb.konya.bel.tr/#!/App/Mezarliklar
  • Ünlerşen, H. (2023). Karaman cami hazirelerinde ve Karaman Müzesi’nde bulunan mezar taşları (Tombstones in Mosque Courtyards and the Museum of Karaman) [Doctoral dissertation, Sosyal Bilgiler Enstitüsü].
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Literary Studies (Other)
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Hatice Ünlerşen 0000-0002-0925-8564

Early Pub Date September 2, 2025
Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date April 29, 2025
Acceptance Date June 21, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ünlerşen, H. (2025). Tangible cultural heritage examples from Konya Hacı Fettah Cemetery: a study on the writing and form features of gravestones. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, 6(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16948042
27919