An Integrated Design-to-Production Workflow for Cement-Based Blocks via Robotic Magnetic Manipulation of Discrete Reinforcements

Abstract

This study presents a proof-of-concept design-to-production framework (D2PF) integrating a 6-axis industrial robotic arm with a custom electromagnetic end effector to organise discrete metallic elements within cement-based blocks. The system enables non-contact, field-based manipulation of magnetically responsive elements (office pins), forming programmable reinforcement patterns guided by predefined toolpath geometries. Toolpaths are generated using parametric design environments (Rhino/Grasshopper) and executed via robotic control software (KUKA|prc), enabling controlled aggregation and repositioning through electromagnetic actuation. Key parameters include robot speed, toolpath repetitions, wire winding count, magnetic force regulation, and reinforcement geometry. To assess feasibility, three cement-based blocks (25 × 25 × 5 cm) with spiral and circular reinforcement configurations, along with an unreinforced reference block, were produced and evaluated using an adapted three-point bending procedure. Results indicate that magnetically formed reinforcements improve flexural performance and enhance crack-bridging capacity compared to the unreinforced sample. The workflow offers an accessible pathway for material-aware robotic manufacturing and non-contact reinforcement strategies in cement-based construction.

Keywords

• Design-to-Production
• Robotic Fabrication
• Electromagnetic End-Effector
• Cement-Based Block Fabrication
• Flexural Performance Testing.

Ethical Statement

This study does not involve human participants or animals. Therefore, ethical approval was not required.

References

1. Abrons, E., Fure, A., Dubor, A., Diaz, G. B., Camprodon, G., & Wolking, A. (2014). Sense-it: Robotic sensing and materially-directed generative fabrication. In Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014 (pp. 357–369). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04663-1_25
2. Ahlquist, S., Ketcheson, L., & Colombi, C. (2017). Multisensory architecture: The dynamic interplay of environment, movement and social function. Architectural Design, 87(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2157
3. Alaçam, S., Güzelci, O. Z., Türel, A., Çevik, A. N., Özdemir, S., Gürer, E., Doğan, Ü. A., Dabanlı, Ö., & Pektaş, Ö. K. (2026). Structural optimization for robotic concrete construction: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 16(12), 6070. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16126070
4. Alonso-Canon, S., Blanco-Fernandez, E., Castro-Fresno, D., Yoris-Nobile, A. I., & Castañon-Jano, L. (2022). Reinforcements in 3D printing concrete structures. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 23(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00552-z
5. Amini, M. M., Ghanepour, M., & Rezaifar, O. (2024). Experimental analysis of the impact of alternating magnetic fields on the compressive strength of concrete with various silica sand and microsilica compositions. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 21, e03487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03487
6. Bacchetti, A., Lloyd, P., Taccola, S., Fakhoury, E., Cochran, S., Harris, R. A., Valdastri, P., & Chandler, J. H. (2022). Optimization and fabrication of programmable domains for soft magnetic robots: A review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 1040984. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.1040984
7. Brugnaro, G., Figliola, A., & Dubor, A. (2019). Negotiated materialization: Design approaches integrating wood heterogeneity through advanced robotic fabrication. In F. Bianconi & M. Filippucci (Eds.), Digital Wood Design (pp. 55–73). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03676-8_4
8. Carrillo, J., Vargas, J. D., & Alcocer, S. M. (2021). Model for estimating the flexural performance of concrete reinforced with hooked end steel fibres using three-point bending tests. Structural Concrete, 22, 1760–1783. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000432

9. Decker, M. (2015). Soft robotics and emergent materials in architecture. Proceedings of the eCAADe Conference (pp. 409–416).
10. Dickey, R. (2017). Soft systems: Rethinking indeterminacy in architecture as opportunity driven research. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong (pp. 811–821).
11. Dierichs, K., & Menges, A. (2012). Aggregate structures: Material and machine computation of designed granular substances. Architectural Design, 82, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1382
12. Dubor, A., & Diaz, G. B. (2013). Magnetic architecture. In S. Brell-Çokcan & J. Braumann (Eds.), Rob|Arch 2012: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design (pp. 241–251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1465-0_24
13. Gharbia, M., Chang-Richards, A., Lu, Y., Zhong, R. Y., & Li, H. (2020). Robotic technologies for on-site building construction: A systematic review. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101584
14. Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., & Langenberg, S. (2017). Fabricate 2014: Negotiating design & making. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1tp3c5w
15. Güzelci, O. Z., Alaçam, S., Bacınoğlu, S. Z., & Şener, S. M. (2021). Integrating the algorithmic tectonics to design process with CAD/CAM: Challenges and opportunities. In M. Dal (Ed.), Architectural Sciences and Technology (pp. 195–224). Livre de Lyon.
16. Hack, N., & Kloft, H. (2020). Shotcrete 3D printing technology for the fabrication of slender fully reinforced freeform concrete elements with high surface quality: A real-scale demonstrator. In Proceedings of the 2nd RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication (Digital Concrete 2020) (pp. 1128–1137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_107
17. Hack, N., Bahar, M., Hühne, C., Lopez, W., Gantner, S., Khader, N., & Rothe, T. (2021). Development of a robot-based multi-directional dynamic fibre winding process for additive manufacturing using shotcrete 3D printing. Fibers, 9(6), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9060039
18. Hack, N., & Lauer, W. V. (2014). Mesh-mould: Robotically fabricated spatial meshes as reinforced concrete formwork. Architectural Design, 84, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1753
19. Heidarnezhad, F., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Shotcrete based 3D concrete printing: State of art, challenges, and opportunities. Construction and Building Materials, 323, 126545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126545
20. Helm, V., Ercan, S., Gramazio, F., & Kohler, M. (2012). Mobile robotic fabrication on construction sites: DimRob. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 4335–4341). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385617
21. Helm, V., Willmann, J., Gramazio, F., & Kohler, M. (2014). In-situ robotic fabrication: Advanced digital manufacturing beyond the laboratory. In F. Röhrbein, G. Veiga, & C. Natale (Eds.), Gearing Up and Accelerating Cross-Fertilization Between Academic and Industrial Robotics Research in Europe (pp. 63–83). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02934-4_4
22. Jumet, B., Bell, M. D., Sanchez, V., & Preston, D. J. (2022). A data-driven review of soft robotics. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4, 2100163. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100163
23. Kalousdian, N. K., Łochnicki, G., Hartmann, V. N., Leder, S., Oguz, O. S., Menges, A., & Toussaint, M. (2022). Learning robotic manipulation of natural materials with variable properties for construction tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7, 5749–5756. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3159288
24. Kim, Y., & Zhao, X. (2022). Magnetic soft materials and robots. Chemical Reviews, 122, 5317–5364. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481
25. Kotnik, T., & Weinstock, M. (2012). Material, form and force. Architectural Design, 82(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1386
26. Mu, R., Dong, R., Liu, H., Chen, H., Cheng, Q., & Fan, C. (2021). Preparation of aligned steel-fibre-reinforced concrete using a magnetic field created by the assembly of magnetic pieces. Crystals, 11, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070837
27. Nan, B., Qiao, Y., Leng, J., & Bai, Y. (2025). Advancing structural reinforcement in 3D-printed concrete: Current methods, challenges, and innovations. Materials, 18, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18020252
28. Scheurer, F., Schindler, C., & Braach, M. (2005). From design to production: Three complex structures materialised in wood. In Proceedings of the 6th Generative Art Conference (pp. 237–250).
29. Schwartz, M., & Park, J. (2017). Robotic control strategies applicable to architectural design. Technology | Architecture + Design, 1, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2017.1292796
30. Sitti, M. (2007). Microscale and nanoscale robotics systems [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 14, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2007.339606
31. Stella, F., & Hughes, J. (2023). The science of soft robot design: A review of motivations, methods and enabling technologies. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 1059026. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.1059026