Impact of the Code-Based Near-Fault Factor on Buried Steel Pipelines via the Design Response Spectrum: Seydişehir–Ermenek Case Study

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of the code-based near-fault factor on the seismic response of buried steel natural-gas pipelines through the design response spectrum approach prescribed in the Turkish Seismic Code for Pipeline Systems and Liquid Storage Tanks (2023). The novelty lies in explicitly incorporating both the maximum-direction and near-fault factors into a spectrum-based finite element assessment and quantitatively evaluating their effects on displacement- and stress-based seismic demands. A planned pipeline route between Seydişehir (Konya) and Ermenek (Karaman), Türkiye, was selected as a case study, and seismic hazard parameters were obtained from the Turkish Seismic Hazard Map. The pipeline was modeled using four-node shell elements, while soil–pipe interaction was represented by linear elastic Winkler springs. Response-spectrum analyses were performed for DD-1, DD-1a, DD-2, and DD-3 ground-motion levels. For the DD-1 level including the near-fault factor, the maximum vertical displacement reached 10.42 mm, and the maximum axial membrane stress was approximately 62 MPa. The inclusion of the near-fault factor increased the maximum vertical displacement by 41% and raised the axial strain and membrane force demands by about 30%. The results demonstrate that neglecting this factor may lead to unconservative estimates of deformation demands in buried steel pipelines near active faults.

Keywords

• Buried Steel Pipeline
• Near-Fault Factor
• Response Spectrum
• Soil–Pipe Interaction
• Finite Element Model

Supporting Institution

This research did not receive any specific grant or financial support from public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Ethical Statement

The author declares that this study does not involve human or animal experiments and therefore does not require ethics committee approval. In addition, all ethical principles, including authorship, proper citation, data reporting, and the publication of original research, have been fully observed.

Thanks

A short version of this study was presented as an abstract paper at the BILSEL Ahlat Congress.

References

1. AFAD (2018). Türkiye Deprem Tehlike Haritası ve Açıklama Raporu. Ankara.
2. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA). (2001). Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. FEMA.
3. American Petroleum Institute (API). (2018). Specification for Line Pipe (API 5L). Washington, DC.
4. Bray, J. D., & Travasarou, T. (2007). Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(4), 381–392. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(381)
5. Gresnigt, A. M. (1986). Plastic design of buried steel pipelines in settlement areas. Heron Journal, 31(4).
6. Honegger, D. G., & Nyman, D. J. (2004). Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. Proceedings of IPC2004. doi:10.1115/IPC2004-0252
7. Karamanos, S. A., & Dakoulas, P. (2009). Mechanical behavior of buried pipes crossing active faults. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(6), 821–834. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000035
8. Kennedy, R. P., Chow, A. W., & Williamson, R. A. (1977). Fault movement effects on buried oil pipeline. Transportation Engineering Journal, 103(5), 617–633. doi:10.1061/TPEJAN.0000893

9. Liu, A., O’Rourke, M. J., & Zhang, J. (2015). Effects of permanent ground deformation on buried steel pipelines. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 76, 140–152. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.04.002
10. Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. doi:10.1193/1.1585808
11. O’Rourke, M. J., & Liu, X. (2012). Seismic design of buried and offshore pipelines. MCEER Monograph. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0140-2
12. Somerville, P. G. (1997). Characterizing near-fault ground motion. Earthquake Spectra, 13(1), 123–153. doi:10.1193/1.1585892
13. Takada, S., Hassani, N., & Fukuda, K. (2001). A new proposal for simplified design of buried steel pipes crossing active faults. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(8), 1243–1257. doi:10.1002/eqe.57
14. Türkiye Boru Hatları ile Petrol Taşıma A.Ş. (2023). Türkiye Boru Hattı Sistemleri ve Sıvı Depolama Tankları Deprem Yönetmeliği. Ankara.
15. Uckan, E., O’Rourke, M., & Gresnigt, A. (2015). Behavior of buried steel pipelines subjected to strike-slip faulting. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 137(3), 031701. doi:10.1115/1.4029552
16. Vazouras, P., Karamanos, S. A., & Dakoulas, P. (2010). Mechanical behavior of buried steel pipes crossing active strike-slip faults. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(11), 1361–1376. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011
17. Wang, L. R. L., & Yeh, Y. H. (1985). A refined seismic analysis and design of buried pipelines for fault movement. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 13(1), 75–96. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290130107