COMPARISON OF SPINAL CURVATURES OF WOMEN HAD GIVEN MULTIPLE TIMES AND NEVER GIVEN BIRTH

Year 2024, , 39 - 44, 30.04.2024

Gülüm Sarğın , Hüseyin Karadağ , Deniz Dirik

https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1390333

Abstract

Background: It is known that the amount of load loaded on the body affects the spine and spinal curvature. It was thought that the spine could be affected during each pregnancy experienced by the women. The spine measurements of women who gave birth and those who did not were compared .
Material and methots: In this study, the spines of women who came to X X.X. Medical Center Gynecology and Obstetrics Poliyclinic in 2020 were examined using the Spinal Mouse device. In posture analysis, it was aimed to evaluate the results of the measurements obtained with the Spinal Mouse. A total of 100 women between the ages of 30-35, 50 from women who have never given birth and 50 from women who have had multiple births [women who have given birth at least three times ], were included in the study. T-Test was used to compare group means in terms of continuous variables.
Results: As a result of the findings obtained, the average weight of women who gave birth and never gave birth was p=0.001 as a result of statistical analysis and it was found significant. There was a difference in angular values between the two groups, with LL [p=0.001 ] and SK [p=0.003 ] measurements taken in the extension position in the measurements taken in the upright position, a significant result was obtained in the TK [p=0.040 ] and LL [p=0.001 ] values.
Conclusions: It is seen that every birth process experienced negatively affects the posture of women. Therefore, women who have given birth should be made aware of the necessary exercise and physical activity in order to control and protect the spine health.

Keywords

Spine, Birth,, Spinal curvatura,, Women,, Spinal mause,

References

• [1] Yıldırım, M. (2006). Human Anatomy. 6th Edition. Istanbul: Nobel Medicine Bookstores.
• [2] Büyükikiz, D. (2021). The study of spine posture scanning with a spinal mouse in primary school first-,fifth-, and eighth-grade male and female students. [Master Thesis]. Van: Van Yüzüncü Yl University.
• [3] Frost, B.A., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Foster, E.J.(2019). Materials for the spine: anatomy, problems, and solution.2019;12 [2 ]:253
• [4] Domaradzki, J., Kochan-Jache, K., Trojanowska, I., Kozlenia, D. (2021). Kickboxers and crossfitters vertebral column curvatures in the sagittal plane: Crossfit practice influence in kickboxer body posture. 25:193-98.
• [5] Otman, A.S., Demirel, H., Sade, A. (1995). Basic evaluation principles in therapeutic movements. Ankara: Hacettepe Publications.
• [6] Bingöl, M. (2022). The investigation of spine postures of elite athletes doing mountaineering and artificial wall climbing with spinal mouse. Doctoral Thesis. Van: Van Yüzüncü Yl University.
• [7] Betsch, M., Hakimi, M., Wehrle, R., Jungbluth, P. (2014). Spinal posture and pelvic position during pregnancy: a prospective rasterstereographic pilot study. J Euro Spine. 24 [6 ]:1282–88.
• [8] Eckland, C.B., Vasavada, A, Catena, R.D. (2021). Shoulder and elbow requirements during sagittal reach as a result of changing anthropometry throughout pregnancy. Applied Ergonomics. 94,103411
• [9] Akyüz, G., Bayındır, O. (2013). Pregnancy-related osteoporosis, TFTR Journal. 2013;53,145-150.
• [10] Üzelpasac, E., Kaya, S. (2016). Changes in Pregnancy, Editor: Türkan Akbayrak, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in Women's Health, 1st Edition, Ankara, Pelikan Publishing, 25-36.
• [11] Yousef, A.M., Handy, H.M., Elshamy, F.F., Awad, M.A., Kandil, İ.M. (2011). Postural changes during normal pregnancy. J American Sci. 2011;7 [6 ]:1013–18.
• [12] Yoo, H., Shin, D., Song, C.(2015). Changes in the spinal curvature, degree of pain, balance ability, and gait ability according to pregnancy period in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Phy Ther Sci. 27 [1 ]:279-84.
• [13] Fernandes, V.L.S., Ribeiro, D.M., Fernandes, L.C., Menezes, R.L. (2018). Postural changes versus balance control and falls in community-living older adults: a systematic review. Fisioter em Mov. 31 [0 ]:25–31.
• [14] Aktan, B. (2015). The effect of clinical pilate exercises and birth preparation training on birth outcomes compared with birth training alone. [Master's Thesis ]. Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program. Ankara.
• [15] Jain, G. (2016). Spine and Spinal Orthoses. First. Spine and Spinal Orthoses. London: The Health Sciences; 2016;P.1–54.
• [16] Mannion, A.F., Mannion, A., Grob, D. (2008). The reliability of a new measuring device [“Spinal Mouse” ] in recording the sagittal profile of the back. Spine. 9:303.
• [17] Ripani, M., Di Cesare, A., Giombini, A., Agnello, L., Fagnani, F., Pigozzi F. (2008). Spinal curvature: comparison of frontal measurements with the spinal mouse and radiographic assessment. J Sports Med and Ph Fitness. 48 [4 ]:488.
• [18] Kaya, F. (2013). Investigation of the validity and reliability of the spinal mouse in the evaluation of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [Master's Thesis]. Ankara: Hacettepe University Health Sciences University.
• [19] Livanelioğlu, A., Kaya, F., Nabiyev,V., Demirkran, G., Frat, T. (2016). The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves. Eur Spine J. 25 [2 ]:476-82.
• [20] Büyükturan, O., Büyükturan, B., Yetiş, M., Yetiş, A. (2018). Evaluation of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles over the skin surface in elderly individuals: Spinal Mouse Validity and Reliability. Dicle Medical Journal. 45 [2 ]:121-7.
• [21] Kayacı, H.T., Hosbay, Z., Tanriverdi, M. (2018). The investigation of low back and neck pain levels in lactating women. CBU-SBED. 5 [4 ],187-191.
• [22] Baydn, S., Baydn, S.S., Emel, E., Günda, M., Alataş, İ. (2012). Pregnancy and lumbar disk herniations, Jineko Obst Journal of Pediatrics and Pediatrics. 4 [3 ]:93-96.
• [23] Dumas, G.A., Reid, JG., Wolfe, LA., Griffin, MP., McGrath, MJ. (1995). Exercise, posture, and back pain during pregnancy. Part 1. Exercise posture. Clinical Bio. 10 [2 ]:104–9.
• [24] Okanishi, N., Kito, N., Akiyama, M., Yamamoto, M. (2012). Spinal curvature and characteristics of postural change in pregnant women. Acta Obst et Gyne Scandinavica. 91 [7 ]:856–61.
• [25] Borg-Stein, J., Dugan S. (2005). Gruber Journal musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. A J Phy Med and Reh. 84pp.180-192.
• [26] Aksu, S., Catalgol, S. (2017). Women's long-term postpartum physical health problems and their relationship with perceived health level. Women's Right Hem Journal. 3 [2 ], 22-42.
• [27] Glinkowski, W.M., Tomasik, P., Walesiak, K., Guszak, M., Krawczak, K., Michoski, J. et all. (2016). Posture and low back pain during pregnancy — 3D study. Ginekologia Polska. 87 [8 ]:575–80.
• [28] Bullock-Saxton, J.E., Jull, G.A., Bullock, M.I. The relationship of low back pain postural changes during pregnancy. Aust J Physiother. 1987;33:11–7.
• [29] Arikan, Beyaz, E., Özcan, E. (2005) Musculoskeletal pain in pregnancy and treatment approaches. Turk J Phys Med. Reh. 51:65-8