Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2026, Volume: 12, - , 03.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244
https://izlik.org/JA84PS25LH

Abstract

Ethical Statement

In order to administer the word association test to individuals within the scope of the research, the necessary ethics committee approval was obtained from the Süleyman Demirel University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee with the decision numbered 164/3 dated 21.02.2025.

References

  • Acharya, S., Boyd, A. D., Cameron, R., Lopez, K. D., Martyn-Nemeth, P., Dickens, C... Di Eugenio, B. (2019). What happened to me while ı was in the hospital? challenges and opportunities for generating patient-friendly hospitalization summaries. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 3, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-018-0036-7
  • Ahlfeldt, H., Borin, L., Daumke, P., Grabar, N., Hallett, C., Hardcastle, D., ... & Willis, A. (2006). Literature review on patient-friendly documentation systems.
  • Aksoy, E. and Aydın, D. (2022). Hastane tasarımlarının geçmişten günümüze değişiminin hasta odaları üzerinden incelenmesi. Bodrum Journal of Art and Design, 1(2), 221-240.
  • Arab, M., Tabatabaei, S. G., Rashidian, A., Forushani, A. R. and Zarei, E. (2012). The effect of service quality on patient loyalty: a study of private hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41(9), 71.
  • Arslanoğlu, A., Kileci, Y. S., Arslan, Ş. F. and Arslan, Z. (2023). Hasta dostu hastane: bir eğitim araştırma hastanesi uygulaması. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 10(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.52880/sagakaderg.1280779
  • Bahar, M. and Özatlı, N. S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 75-85.
  • Baker, S. K. (2023). Thirty ways to make your practice more “patient-friendly”. In Communication for Doctors (pp. 4-5). CRC Press.
  • Buchwald, D., Buchwald, D. and Melgaard. D. (2023). The ımpact of a family-friendly hospital: a patient perspective. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(1), 127-134. doi:10.1177/19375867231201630
  • Dijs-Elsinga, J., Otten, W., Versluijs, M. M., Smeets, H. J., Kievit, J., Vree, R., ... Marang-van de Mheen, P. J. (2010). Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Medical Decision Making, 30(5), 544-555.
  • Dooley S.K. (2006). The patient-friendly practice. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 21(6), 358-61.
  • Douglas, C.H. and Douglas, M.R. (2004). Patient-friendly hospital environments: exploring the patients’ perspective. Health Expectations, 7(1), 61–73. doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00251.x
  • Farahani, M., Esmaeili, M., Ashrafizadeh, H., Hajibabaee, F., Haghani, S. and Ariyamloo, P. (2022). Patient safety friendly hospital standards and customer orientation among Iranian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open Quality, 11(2), e001903.
  • Fatima, T., Malik, S. A. and Shabbir, A. (2018). Hospital healthcare service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation in context of private healthcare systems. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(6), 1195-1214.
  • Filiz, M. and Güngör, S. (2022). Sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda hasta dostu kavramı üzerinde bir değerlendirme. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 657-674. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1058916
  • Fredericks, J. E. and Bunting Jr, R. F. (2010). Implementation of a patient‐friendly medication schedule to improve patient safety within a healthcare system. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 29(4), 22-27.
  • Kılıç, T. and Bostan, S. (2021). Sağlık hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesinde, hasta odaklı yaklaşım: hasta dostu ölçeği tasarımı. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 24(3), 555-570.
  • Koca, G. Ş. and Erigüc, G. (2021). Hasta-hekim ilişkisinde güven iletişimi: hastaların bakış açısıyla ölçmeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 186-202.
  • Kim, J., Gao, J., Amiri-Kordestani, L., Beaver, J. A. and Kluetz, P. (2019). Patient-Friendly Language to Facilitate Treatment Choice for Patients with Cancer. The Oncologist, 24(8), 1011–1012. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0761
  • Lasserre, C. (2010). Fostering a culture of service excellence. Journal of Medicine Practice Management, 26(3), 166-169.
  • NHS (2019). The NHS patient safety strategy. Safer culture, safer systems, safer patients.
  • Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical care, 19(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
  • Raikhola, P. S. (2025). Decoding patient satisfaction: examining the hospital facilities, staff behavior, and accessibility. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 8(1), 134-150.
  • Spath, P. (2007). Tips to make your hospital patient-friendly environment. Hospital Peer Review, 32(5), 60-62.
  • Şendur, G., Özbayrak, Ö. and Uyulgan, M.A. (2011). A study of determination of pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding about acids and bases, Procedia: Computer Sciences, 3, 52-56.
  • Şener, E. (2020). Dost metaforu ı̇şletmeler ı̇çin bir erdem arayışı mı? eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Business &Management Studies: An International, 8(2), 1289-1309
  • van Mens, H. J., Hannen, G. E., Nienhuis, R., Bolt, R. J., de Keizer, N. F. and Cornet, R. (2023). Evaluation of patient-friendly diagnosis clarifications in a hospital patient portal. Applied Clinical Informatics, 14(03), 455-464.
  • Varga, A. I., Spehar, I. and Skirbekk, H. (2023). Trustworthy management in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 662.
  • Weller, S. C., Vickers, B., Bernard, H. R., Blackburn, A. M., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C. C., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PloS one, 13(6), 1-18. e0198606.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (12th ed.). Seçkin Publishing.
  • Zarei, E., Daneshkohan, A., Pouragha, B., Marzban, S. and Arab, M. (2014). An empirical study of the impact of service quality on patient satisfaction in private hospitals, Iran. Global journal of health science, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p1
  • Zaretsky, J., Kim, J. M., Baskharoun, S., Zhao, Y., Austrian, J., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., ... and Feldman, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence to transform inpatient discharge summaries to patient-friendly language and format. JAMA Network Open, 7(3), e240357-e240357

Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test

Year 2026, Volume: 12, - , 03.03.2026
https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244
https://izlik.org/JA84PS25LH

Abstract

The concept of a patient-friendly hospital is a significant concept representing patient-centered healthcare services. Today, one way to improve the quality of healthcare is to meet patient expectations. Therefore, determining how the concept of a patient-friendly hospital is shaped in patients' minds is crucial for developing patient-friendly practices and improving the quality of healthcare services. This study aims to analyze how patients perceive the concept of a "patient-friendly hospital" through a word association test (WAT) and to reveal patients' cognitive structures related to this concept. Among the 718 words obtained, the highest frequency words were reliable (81), privacy (41), smiling-face (40), caring (30), clean (25), hygiene (22), and communication (20), resulting in a total of 172 different words. Content analysis conducted as part of the word association analysis yielded eight themes: communication, trust, accessibility, quality, service, staff, treatment, and environment. Individuals define patient-friendly hospitals not only as places with good physical conditions but also as institutions that value, respect, and have an understanding approach to patients. It can be said that in order to improve the quality of health services, more importance should be given to areas such as communication, ethical values and accessibility.

References

  • Acharya, S., Boyd, A. D., Cameron, R., Lopez, K. D., Martyn-Nemeth, P., Dickens, C... Di Eugenio, B. (2019). What happened to me while ı was in the hospital? challenges and opportunities for generating patient-friendly hospitalization summaries. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 3, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-018-0036-7
  • Ahlfeldt, H., Borin, L., Daumke, P., Grabar, N., Hallett, C., Hardcastle, D., ... & Willis, A. (2006). Literature review on patient-friendly documentation systems.
  • Aksoy, E. and Aydın, D. (2022). Hastane tasarımlarının geçmişten günümüze değişiminin hasta odaları üzerinden incelenmesi. Bodrum Journal of Art and Design, 1(2), 221-240.
  • Arab, M., Tabatabaei, S. G., Rashidian, A., Forushani, A. R. and Zarei, E. (2012). The effect of service quality on patient loyalty: a study of private hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41(9), 71.
  • Arslanoğlu, A., Kileci, Y. S., Arslan, Ş. F. and Arslan, Z. (2023). Hasta dostu hastane: bir eğitim araştırma hastanesi uygulaması. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 10(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.52880/sagakaderg.1280779
  • Bahar, M. and Özatlı, N. S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 75-85.
  • Baker, S. K. (2023). Thirty ways to make your practice more “patient-friendly”. In Communication for Doctors (pp. 4-5). CRC Press.
  • Buchwald, D., Buchwald, D. and Melgaard. D. (2023). The ımpact of a family-friendly hospital: a patient perspective. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(1), 127-134. doi:10.1177/19375867231201630
  • Dijs-Elsinga, J., Otten, W., Versluijs, M. M., Smeets, H. J., Kievit, J., Vree, R., ... Marang-van de Mheen, P. J. (2010). Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care. Medical Decision Making, 30(5), 544-555.
  • Dooley S.K. (2006). The patient-friendly practice. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 21(6), 358-61.
  • Douglas, C.H. and Douglas, M.R. (2004). Patient-friendly hospital environments: exploring the patients’ perspective. Health Expectations, 7(1), 61–73. doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00251.x
  • Farahani, M., Esmaeili, M., Ashrafizadeh, H., Hajibabaee, F., Haghani, S. and Ariyamloo, P. (2022). Patient safety friendly hospital standards and customer orientation among Iranian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open Quality, 11(2), e001903.
  • Fatima, T., Malik, S. A. and Shabbir, A. (2018). Hospital healthcare service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty: An investigation in context of private healthcare systems. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(6), 1195-1214.
  • Filiz, M. and Güngör, S. (2022). Sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda hasta dostu kavramı üzerinde bir değerlendirme. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 657-674. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1058916
  • Fredericks, J. E. and Bunting Jr, R. F. (2010). Implementation of a patient‐friendly medication schedule to improve patient safety within a healthcare system. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 29(4), 22-27.
  • Kılıç, T. and Bostan, S. (2021). Sağlık hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesinde, hasta odaklı yaklaşım: hasta dostu ölçeği tasarımı. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 24(3), 555-570.
  • Koca, G. Ş. and Erigüc, G. (2021). Hasta-hekim ilişkisinde güven iletişimi: hastaların bakış açısıyla ölçmeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 186-202.
  • Kim, J., Gao, J., Amiri-Kordestani, L., Beaver, J. A. and Kluetz, P. (2019). Patient-Friendly Language to Facilitate Treatment Choice for Patients with Cancer. The Oncologist, 24(8), 1011–1012. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0761
  • Lasserre, C. (2010). Fostering a culture of service excellence. Journal of Medicine Practice Management, 26(3), 166-169.
  • NHS (2019). The NHS patient safety strategy. Safer culture, safer systems, safer patients.
  • Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical care, 19(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
  • Raikhola, P. S. (2025). Decoding patient satisfaction: examining the hospital facilities, staff behavior, and accessibility. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 8(1), 134-150.
  • Spath, P. (2007). Tips to make your hospital patient-friendly environment. Hospital Peer Review, 32(5), 60-62.
  • Şendur, G., Özbayrak, Ö. and Uyulgan, M.A. (2011). A study of determination of pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding about acids and bases, Procedia: Computer Sciences, 3, 52-56.
  • Şener, E. (2020). Dost metaforu ı̇şletmeler ı̇çin bir erdem arayışı mı? eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Business &Management Studies: An International, 8(2), 1289-1309
  • van Mens, H. J., Hannen, G. E., Nienhuis, R., Bolt, R. J., de Keizer, N. F. and Cornet, R. (2023). Evaluation of patient-friendly diagnosis clarifications in a hospital patient portal. Applied Clinical Informatics, 14(03), 455-464.
  • Varga, A. I., Spehar, I. and Skirbekk, H. (2023). Trustworthy management in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 662.
  • Weller, S. C., Vickers, B., Bernard, H. R., Blackburn, A. M., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C. C., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PloS one, 13(6), 1-18. e0198606.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (12th ed.). Seçkin Publishing.
  • Zarei, E., Daneshkohan, A., Pouragha, B., Marzban, S. and Arab, M. (2014). An empirical study of the impact of service quality on patient satisfaction in private hospitals, Iran. Global journal of health science, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n1p1
  • Zaretsky, J., Kim, J. M., Baskharoun, S., Zhao, Y., Austrian, J., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., ... and Feldman, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence to transform inpatient discharge summaries to patient-friendly language and format. JAMA Network Open, 7(3), e240357-e240357
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tuğçe Kaya 0000-0002-3686-2396

Sümeyye Yıldırım 0000-0002-6543-2467

Submission Date October 1, 2025
Acceptance Date January 4, 2026
Publication Date March 3, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244
IZ https://izlik.org/JA84PS25LH
Published in Issue Year 2026 Volume: 12

Cite

APA Kaya, T., & Yıldırım, S. (2026). Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244
AMA 1.Kaya T, Yıldırım S. Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2026;12. doi:10.48121/jihsam.1795244
Chicago Kaya, Tuğçe, and Sümeyye Yıldırım. 2026. “Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 12 (March). https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244.
EndNote Kaya T, Yıldırım S (March 1, 2026) Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 12
IEEE [1]T. Kaya and S. Yıldırım, “Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test”, Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, vol. 12, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.48121/jihsam.1795244.
ISNAD Kaya, Tuğçe - Yıldırım, Sümeyye. “Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management 12 (March 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.48121/jihsam.1795244.
JAMA 1.Kaya T, Yıldırım S. Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2026;12. doi:10.48121/jihsam.1795244.
MLA Kaya, Tuğçe, and Sümeyye Yıldırım. “Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test”. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, vol. 12, Mar. 2026, doi:10.48121/jihsam.1795244.
Vancouver 1.Tuğçe Kaya, Sümeyye Yıldırım. Analyzing Individuals’ Perceptions of The Concept of Patient- Friendly Hospitals Through a Word Association Test. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management. 2026 Mar. 1;12. doi:10.48121/jihsam.1795244

Aim & Scope

Journal of International Health Sciences and Management (JIHSAM) aims explain the relationship between management/ administration and health sciences. The JIHSAM includes healthcare management/ administration, public health, clinics and case management/ administration, dental management,   pharmaceutical economics and management, nursing management and health planning, policy and management, and other health management issues. 

Journal of International Health Sciences and Management (JIHSAM) is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of Health Sciences and Management issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between Health Sciences and Management researchers, the globalization of healthcare services, international patient transfers (medical tourism), hospital management, organization behavior of health institute, patient rights and safety and satisfaction, health policy and health reforms, health economics and quality of life.

In addition, the following healthcare management issues are evaluated within the scope of the journal;

political philosophy and health policy, spiritual health, history and philosophy of health and healthcare, global cooperation and development for quality in healthcare, health accreditation, risk management in healthcare organizations, health law, quality assessment of health, patient and employee satisfaction occupational health and safety in health care, financial management in healthcareharassment in health institutions, corporate culture and commitment institutes of health, procurement and purchasing in health institutions, material and device management in healthcare organizations, performance management in healthcare organizations, health information systems, management and organization in healthcare, accounting and finance in healthcare organizations, strategic management in health care, production management in health care, health economics, health policy and planning, marketing in healthcare, health reform, disaster management in health care ,public relations in health institutions, health and social security systems, health insurance, health communication, healthcare management and ethics, country comparisons of health systems, health statistics, risk management in patient and employee safety ,patient rights in an international perspective, innovation in healthcare services, human resources management in healthcareprofessionalism in health management and information security in healthcare organizations.

To achieve the journal's objectives, authors are encouraged to write in an on-technical style, which is understandable to health policy practitioners and specialists from other disciplines and in other countries.

Types of Articles

 

Journal of International Health Sciences and Management will be accepting submissions in three different formats:

 

(1)"Samples of the best practices in health management" of around 2,000 words (excluding abstract and references), concentrating on proposed,  discussed, just passed and/or implemented management in one of the Health Systems and Institution. These do not have to present empirical data but analyze actor sand processes.

 

(2) "Full-length Original Articles" of around 5,000 words (and not more than 6000 words), mainly empirical, analyzing the impact of health sciences and management. In addition, more theoretical, conceptual or methodological papers can be submitted.

 

(3) "Reviews/comparative analyses" of around 8,000 words (and not more than 10,000 words) can either be

(a) systematic reviews of Health Sciences and Management issues

(b) or examine certain aspects of health science and management in a systematic, comparative manner across a number of countries.

 

In all cases, Authors should provide sufficient background and context and discuss their findings in an international context to ensure that their manuscript can be appreciated by an international readership.

 

Besides these three main types of submissions, Health Science and Management is interested in publishing debate among the readers in the form of letters and repliques as well as commissioned editorials.

 

The material should not have been previously published in peer-review for all types of submissions. Publication as an abstract, academic thesis or discussion paper is permissible but needs to be stated in the cover letter to the editor upon submission.


 Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors must check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.


The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).

The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.

Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.

The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.

The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.

If submitting to a peer-reviewed journal section, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

Ethics committee approval must be obtained separately for the clinical and experimental human and animal studies required by the ethics committee decision. This approval should be stated and documented in the Method section of the article.

Size and Layout

Manuscripts should be written in English. They should be clear, concise and logical, and follow the suggested word length (see above) as well as the number of tables and figures (see below).

Manuscripts should be structured as follows (excluding samples of the best practices in health management):

Cover letter
Title Page (incl. Acknowledgements, e.g. to sponsors, and Conflict of Interest statement)
Abstract-Keywords
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Appendices (will be included as online supplementary material if the manuscript is accepted).

There should be no footnotes or endnotes in the manuscript.

Manuscripts that do not comply with the above mentioned manuscript guidelines will be considered as non-admissible. All submissions will be checked for plagiarism. The handling editor will be informed about any incorrectly cited text passages/ findings of plagiarism.

 Figures, tables and equations

Figures and tables are encouraged but should not be too technical. Technical tables and especially equations or other formulae should be avoided. Except in exceptional circumstances, the admissible number of figures and tables together is 3 for samples of the best practices in health management articles, 5 for full-length articles and 6 for reviews and comparative articles. Additional figures and tables may be supplied as supplementary material. Figures and tables should still be legible when reduced in size for printing (for more details see below).

Abstract

An abstract of 220 words (and not more than 250) must be included in the submitted manuscript. As the abstract is often viewed separately from the article, it must be able to stand alone. It should state briefly and clearly the purpose and setting, the principal findings and major conclusions, and the paper's contribution to knowledge. If applicable, the country/countries/locations should be clearly stated, as should the methods and nature of the sample, the dates, and a summary of the findings/ conclusion. Please note that excessive statistical details should be avoided, abbreviations/acronyms used only if essential or firmly established, and the abstract should not contain references to other published work.

Keywords

Authors are asked to classify their submission using the provided classification system. They are also asked to include 3 to 6 keywords.

Illustration services

Figure captions

Ensure that each illustration has a caption. Supply captions separately, not attached to the figure. A caption should comprise a brief title (not on the figure itself) and a description of the illustration. Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used.

Tables

Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. Place foot notes to tables below the table body and indicate them with superscript lowercase letters. Avoid vertical rules. Be sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in tables do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article.

Throughout the manuscript text, Authors must indicate where approximately the figures and tables should be included.

References

Citation in text

Reference to a journal publication:

References (APA style): Cite references in the text as “last name, year”, e.g. (Turkmen, 2004). For multiple authors and page numbers in the text, e.g. (Turkmen et al., 2013:65).

References should be listed in alphabetical order, and include all the authors’ last names and initials, title, journal, year, volume, issue, and pages etc.

Reference Examples:

Gardner H, Bozkus T (2012). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

Li, G., Hart, A. ve Gregory, J., (1998). Flocculation and sedimentation of high turbidity waters, Proceedings , 9th Biennial Conference, International Association on Water Quality, 1137–1143, Vancouver: International presentation

Li, G., Hart, A. ve Gregory, J., (1998). Flocculation and sedimentation of high turbidity water, Water Resources, 25, 9, 1137-1143. :Article

Stanford P (2003). Multiple intelligence for every classroom. Journal of Education Psychology, 39(2): 81-89, http://www.iscs-a.org/content/39/2/80 (accessed May 14, 2013).

Turkmen M (2004). The effects of martial arts on children development. International Journal of Education Reviews, 8(3): 276-281.

In terms of publication ethics Journal of International Health Sciences and Management pursues the principles, standards and recommendations of the publication ethics determined by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). Accordingly, all the articles that do not comply with the accepted standards of ethics are rejected. The rule also applies for those articles that contains discrepancies which are detected after the publication. In the context of publication ethics, all the shareholders are expected to bear the following ethical responsibilities in brief and all the ethical incidences are going to be evaluated in compliance with COPE rules.

The secretary and editorial team review the submitted articles for content and relevance, regardless of the authors' names, qualifications, and affiliations.

It is ensured that the submitted texts that are determined to be suitable for the journal and the names of the file owners are anonymized.

However, even the section with the ethical statement in the text is cleared of the university's name and sent to at least 2 appropriate reviewers for evaluation. Responses and files from reviewers are also forwarded to authors, making sure they are anonymous. This process continues like this. All processes and versions are recorded online.

The only criteria for reviewer assignments. It is the mastery of the subject and the field.

All submissions must meet COPE's four criteria for scientific authorship. (see Submission Rules Page)

The editor welcomes and evaluates the objections and complaints submitted by all world citizens via e-mail regarding the published works.

All possible conflicts of interest between natural and legal persons must be declared in every study uploaded to the journal.

Studies published in the journal are open to direct revision in the first five days. In the next process, change requests will be published as correction articles in the next issue or reported as withdrawn.

Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

Journal of International Health Sciences and Management (JIHSAM) does not charge any article submission, processing charges, and printing charges from the authors. The journal is an open access peer-refereed scientific journal. We have no purpose of profit and no publication fees.

Editor in Chief

Health Economy, Health Management, Disaster and Emergency Management, Hospital Management, Quality Management, Strategy

Assistant Editor

Health Management

Editorial Board

Health Management

Ferhat Zengul, Ph.D., MBA, MAcc is a full-time Associate Professor in the Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions (SHP) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). Prior to joining the Health Care Management Program, he worked as a financial/managerial accountant at UAB Hospital Finance and UABHS Facilities Planning and Capital Projects Office. He has over ten years of experience in the financial management of capital projects.
Dr. Zengul’s overarching research goal is improving organizations' financial health and peoples' health and quality of life through data analytics and multidisciplinary approaches. To achieve this goal, his research focuses on three interest areas: 1) Accounting, Finance, and Data/Text Analytics, 2) Healthcare Management, and Informatics, 3) Infrastructure Projects. He is particularly interested in applying machine learning approaches in developing predictive models for the financial and clinical performance research domain. He has used data/text mining techniques in a variety of disciplines such as accounting, finance, informatics, and clinical research domains. Dr. Zengul is a Certified Revenue Cycle Specialist from Healthcare Financial Management Association. He has been teaching courses such as Accounting and Finance for Healthcare, Healthcare Economics, Finance, Revenue Cycle Management, Business Intelligence, Statistics, and Ethics both in undergraduate and masters and doctoral programs.

Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Arts Therapy, Health Management

1990’da Konya Selçuklu Lisesi’ni bitirerek Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık İdaresi Yüksekokulu’na girdi. 1994’te buradan mezun oldu. Aynı yıl yine Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi Anabilim Dalında yüksek lisansa başladı. 1997’de “Zaman Yönetimi ve Hastane Üst Düzey Yöneticileri Üzerinde Bir Uygulama” adlı teziyle yüksek lisansını tamamladı. Temmuz 1998- ve Kasım 1999 tarihleri arasında Genelkurmay Başkanlığı Sağlık Dairesi Personel ve Eğitim Şubesi’nde sağlık yönetimi subayı olarak askerlik görevini tamamladı. Aralık 1999’da Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu’nda öğretim görevlisi olarak göreve başladı. 2000 yılı Bahar döneminde Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi Anabilim Dalında doktora eğitimine başladı. 2003 Aralık ayında “Toplumsal Kültürün Hastanelerin Kurum Kültürüne Etkisi: Fırat Tıp Merkezi Örneği” adlı teziyle bilim doktoru unvanını aldı. 2009 yılında ise Yönetim ve Organizasyon doçenti oldu. 2014 yılında profesörlüğe atandı.

1999-2009 yılları arasında Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu’nda öğretim görevlisi ve öğretim üyesi çalıştı, Yüksekokul Müdür Yardımcılığı ve Tıbbi Dokümantasyon ve Sekreterlik Program Başkanlığı görevlerini yürüttü. Yine 2015 Mayıs – 2020 Aralık tarihleri arasında Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dekanlığı görevini yürüttü. 2009 yılından bu yana Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sağlık Yönetimi’nde öğretim üyesi olarak çalışmakta ve bölüm başkanlığı görevini yürütmektedir. 2014-2015 yılları arasında Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği Isparta İli akademik danışmanlığını yürütmüş ve halen Sağlık İdarecileri Derneği, Avrupa Birliği Sağlık Araştırmaları Merkezi (ABSAM), Uluslararası Stratejik Sağlık Araştırmaları Merkezi (USSAM) üyesidir. Aynı zamanda 2017’den bu yana Türkiye Sağlık Politikaları Enstitüsü Bilim Kurulu üyesidir.

Son zamanlarda nitel araştırma yöntemleri, eleştirel yönetim, sağlık sosyolojisi ve akademik organizasyonların yapısı ve işleyişi konuları üzerinde çalışmaktadır.

Organisational, Interpersonal and Intercultural Communication, Higher Education Studies, Sociology of Health, Qualitative Methods in Sociology, Management Sociology, Health Management, Human Resources Management, Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour, Hospital Management, Organizational Culture, Organisational Behaviour, Strategy
Ordu Üniversitesi
Health Sciences, Digital Health, Health Management
Information Systems Development Methodologies and Practice, Health Informatics and Information Systems
Health Management
Sociology of Health, Urban Planning and Health, Family Medicine, Residential Client Care, Health Systems, Health Management, Quality Management

Field Editor

Health Policy, Health Sciences, Health Management, Hospital Management
Economic Models and Forecasting, Health Economy, Health Policy
Health Management, Strategy
Health Management

Secretary

Health Management, Supply Chain Management

Language Editor

Health Management

Layout Editor

Health Management

Teknik Editör

Arş. Gör. Mehmet Beşir Demirbaş, 2013 yılında Isparta Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Yönetimi bölümünden 2020 yılında ise tekrar Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Yönetimi bölümünde yüksek lisansını tamamlamıştır. Şu anda Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Sağlık Yönetimi bölümünde doktora eğitimine devam etmektedir. Demiroğlu Bilim Üniversitesi, Sağlık Yönetimi bölümünde araştırma görevlisi olarak çalışmalarına devam eden Demirbaş, sağlık turizmi, yapay zekâ, hibe projeleri ve dijital pazarlama konuları üzerinde çalışmaktadır.

Health Informatics and Information Systems, Health Management, Hospital Management, Project Management