Research Article

IMPACT OF IMÂMIYYAH-ISHNÂASHERIYYAH’S İMÂMATE UNDERSTANDING ON ITS SEMIYYÂH BELIEFS

Volume: 3 Number: 2 December 25, 2017
EN TR

IMPACT OF IMÂMIYYAH-ISHNÂASHERIYYAH’S İMÂMATE UNDERSTANDING ON ITS SEMIYYÂH BELIEFS

Abstract

The Imamiyyah which affirms the grave life, resurrection and the later stages of after life, has decorated the consistance of these things in a way compatible with Imamet, which they have regarded as the continuation of the prophesying. With the effection of this understanding, they have partnered the Imam to all the roles that verses have linked to all the prophets in general and to Muhammad (pbuh) in private, and in some cases they have located him at an upper level from the prophets. The Imamiyyah which puts an important role in the imams, starting from the grave inquiry and all other stages after life, has presented them as “the witnesses of deeds”, “the owners of the account”, “the scales of justice”, who knows havenly and those deserving of hell from their faces, the heaven and the hell servers who intercede their shias and without whose permission nobody can cross the sirat bridge. The Imamiyyah which partners the imam to the roles of the prophets and sometimes of Allah in the cases related with the whole grave life and after life stages, has caused the samiyyah belief to get a marginal consistance in terms of the tavhid principle.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulbâkî, Muhammed Fuâd. (1945). el-Mûcemu’l-mufehres li-elfâzi’l-Kur’âni’l-kerîm. Kahire: Dâru’l-Hadîs.
  2. Âmilî, Muhammed İbnu’l-Hasen el-Hurr. (1963). el-Fusûlu’l-muhimme fî usûli’l-ümme I-III. (Thk.: Muhammed b. Muhammed b. el-Hüseyn el-Kâinî), Müessesetu Meârifi’l-İmâm er-Rızâ.
  3. Askerî, Ebû Muhammed el-Hasen b. Alî. (1988). et-Tefsîrü’l-mensûb ile’l-Hasen el-Askerî. (Thk.: Medresetü’l-İmâm el-Mehdî), Kum: Medresetü’l-İmâm el-Mehdî.
  4. Ayyâşî, Ebû’n-Nasr Muhammed b. Mesûd İbn Ayyâş es-Selemî es-Semerkandî. (1991). Tefsîru’l-Ayyâşî I-II. (Birinci Baskı). Beyrut: Müessesetu’l-E‘lemî li’l-Matbûât.
  5. Bağdâdî, Ebû Mansûr Abdulkâhir Tâhir b. Muhammed. (1988). el-Fark beyne’l-fırak -ve beyânu fırkati’n-nâcîye minhum-. (Thk.: Muhammed Osman el-Hoşet), Kahire: Mektebetu İbn Sînâ.
  6. ____. (1928). Usûli’d-dîn. (Birinci Baskı). İstanbul: Darü’l-Fünûn.
  7. Bahrânî, Seyyid Hâşim. (2006). el-Burhân fî tefsîri’l-Kur’ân. (İkinci Baskı). (Thk.: Hey’et), Beyrut: Müessesetü’l-E‘lemî li’l-Matbûâ‘t.
  8. Behbehânî, Abdülkerîm. (2006) fi-Rihâbi Ehli’l-beyt: eş-şefâ‘â. (Üçüncü Baskı). Beyrut: el-Mektebetu’t-Tahsisîyye fi’r-Red ale’l-Vehhâbîyye.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 25, 2017

Submission Date

November 24, 2017

Acceptance Date

December 15, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Maviş, N. (2017). İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 3(2), 97-110. https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH
AMA
1.Maviş N. İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. JILSES. 2017;3(2):97-110. https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH
Chicago
Maviş, Nezir. 2017. “İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences 3 (2): 97-110. https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH.
EndNote
Maviş N (December 1, 2017) İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences 3 2 97–110.
IEEE
[1]N. Maviş, “İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”, JILSES, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–110, Dec. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH
ISNAD
Maviş, Nezir. “İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences 3/2 (December 1, 2017): 97-110. https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH.
JAMA
1.Maviş N. İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. JILSES. 2017;3:97–110.
MLA
Maviş, Nezir. “İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ”. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2017, pp. 97-110, https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH.
Vancouver
1.Nezir Maviş. İMÂMÎYYE-İSNÂAŞERÎYYE’NİN İMÂMET ANLAYIŞININ, SEMÎYYÂT İNANCININ ŞEKİLLENMESİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. JILSES [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 1;3(2):97-110. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59RX47XH