Can Singapore's Development Model Be Successful in Rwanda?
Abstract
Singapore has become a country that attracts attention not only in its region but also around the world with its economic development success. The present study examines the reasons behind Singapore's success by focusing on Lee Kuan Yew's policies following his assumption of government in Singapore. It is evident that the implementation of a meritocracy approach by Yew resulted in the effective resolution of a significant national challenge, namely corruption. In addition, a comprehensive restructuring of the country's education and infrastructure was implemented with the objective of enhancing its global competitiveness. Moreover, he elevated the nation to a position of prominence in the global trade arena through the implementation of a free market economy and the strategic investment in ports. Similarly, the efforts of Paul Kagame following his rise to power in Rwanda in 2000 to prevent the country from reliving its past sufferings and to gain a respectable place in the international system are emphasized. Adopting the motto "Singapore of Africa", Kagame's approach centered on the development of technology and service sectors, with the objective of reducing the country's reliance on the agricultural economy. The two countries are evaluated and compared on the basis of similarities such as colonial past, geographical smallness and authoritarian leadership. The present study provides a comparative perspective to understand the intersection of local dynamics and global integration in the development strategies of disadvantaged Singapore and Rwanda. The study's central argument concerns the question of whether Rwanda, adopting Singapore as a paradigm of economic success, might also attain comparable levels of prosperity within the framework of authoritarian modernization theory.
Keywords
Authoritarian Modernization Theory, International System, Economic Development
References
- Bakioğlu, A., & Göçmen, G. (2013). Singapur eğitim sistemi. A. Bakioğlu (Ed.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim sistemleri (pp. 127-155). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
- Britannica (n.d.). City State. https://www.britannica.com/topic/city-state
- Çakmak, U. (2022). Fundamental dynamics of Singapore's economic miracle: 1965-1995. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 33(122), 67-112. https://doi.org/10.5455/ey.21007
- Des Forges, A. L. (1999). Leave none to tell the story: Genocide in Rwanda. Human Rights Watch.
- Grunfeld, F., & Huijboom, A. (2007). The failure to prevent genocide in Rwanda: The role of bystanders. Brill.
- Huff, W. G. (1995). The Economic growth of Singapore: Trade and development in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.
- IMF (2023). World Economic Outlook Database, October 2023 Edition. "GDP per capita, current prices (U.S. dollars)" – Singapore. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2023/October
- Jefremovas, V. (2004). Socioeconomic factors, not ethnic hatred, led to the genocide. In C. Fisanick (Ed.), The Rwanda genocide: At issue in history (pp. 29-39). Greenhaven Press.
- Kalaycı, R. (2010). Kore: Doğu Asya’da yükselen çatışma ya da kısıtlı tırmandırma. In K. İnat, B. Duran, & M. Aratan (Eds.), Dünya çatışmaları: Çatışma bölgeleri ve konuları (pp. 389-416). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
- Kim, C.-H., & Choi, Y. (2017). How meritocracy is defined today? Contemporary aspects of meritocracy. Economics & Sociology, 10(3), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2017/10-1/8