Aksaz Sulak Alanının Bentik Diyatome Topluluğu ve İndekslerine Göre Ekolojik Değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Aksaz sulak alanının ekolojik durumunun diyatome indeksleri ve diyatome topluluğuna dayalı olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Örneklemeler Mart 2020 ile Aralık 2020 arasında yapılmıştır. Bentik diyatome florasına ait 50 takson tespit edilmiştir. Navicula Bory, Nitzschia Hassall cinsleri tüm örneklerde gözlemlenmiş ve tespit edilen taksonların %47 sini oluşturmuştur. Aksaz sulak alanında hesaplanan indeks ve ekolojik kalite değerleri sulak alanın su kütlesinin orta düzeyde kirlilik yükü taşıdığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Aksaz
• Bentik diyatome
• Ekolojik kalite oranı
• Trofik indeks

Ecological Evaluation of Aksaz Wetland Based on Benthic Diatome Community and Indices

Abstract

This study aims to examine the ecological status of the Aksaz wetland based on diatom indices and diatom community. Sampling was done between March 2020 and December 2020. 50 taxa belonging to benthic diatom flora were identified. Navicula Bory and Nitzschia Hassall genera were observed in all samples and constituted 47% of the identified taxa. The index and ecological quality values in the Aksaz wetland indicate that the water body is moderately polluted.

Keywords

• Aksaz
• benthic diatoms
• ecological quality ratio
• trophic indices

References

1. Anonim. (2009). Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium. URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC51340 (Erişim tarihi: 20 Haziran, 2022) Anonim. (2020). Sinop İli 2019 Yılı Çevre Durum Raporu. Sinop Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü, Çed ve Çevre İzinleri Şube Müdürlüğü, Sinop. URL: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/s-nop_2019_cdr-20210315133413.pdf ( Erişim tarihi: 20 Haziran, 2022)
2. Anonim. (2022). Wetlands: a global disappearing act. URL : www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/ factsheet3_global_ disappearing_act_0.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 22 Ekim, 2022).
3. Anderson, N. J. (2000). Diatoms, temperature and climatic change. European Journal of Phycology, 35 (4): 307-314.
4. APHA. (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20 th Edition, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation, Washington DC.
5. Battarbee, R. W. (1986). Diatom analysis. Berglund, B.E. (Ed.) Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. (s. 527-570). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
6. Bennion, H., Kelly, M.G., Juggins, S., Yallop, M.L., Burgess, A., Jamieson, J., Krokowski, J. (2014). Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshwater Science, 33 (2): 639-654.
7. Celekli, A., Toudjanı, A., Gümüş, E.Y., Kayhan, S., Lekesiz, H., Cetin, T. (2019). Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment. Turkish Journal of Botany, 43 (1): 90-101.
8. De Fabricius, A.L.M., Maidana, N., Gómez, N. & Sabater, S. (2003). Distribution patterns of benthic diatoms in a Pampean river exposed to seasonal floods: the Cuarto River (Argentina). Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 2443–2454.

9. Ercan, F., Günal, N. (2020). Sinop’un Yağış Özellikleri. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2): 25-54.
10. Fukai, Y., Matsuno, K., Fujiwara, A., Yamaguchi, A. (2019). The community composition of diatom resting stages in sediments of the northern Bering Sea in 2017 and 2018: the relationship to the interannual changes in the extent of the sea ice. Polar Biology, 42 (10): 1915-1922.
11. Gehant, P. A. (2015). Seasonal trends in permanent and ephemeral wetland water chemistry. University of Wisconsin-Stout Journal of Student Research, 14, 203-211. Gottschalk, S., & Kahlert, M. (2012). Shifts in taxonomical and guild composition of littoral diatom assemblages along environmental gradients. Hydrobiologia, 694, 41-56.
12. Gümüş, F., Gönülol, A. (2018). Epılıthıc dıatom-based ecologıcal assessment in Taşmanlı pond (Sınop, Turkey). Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 19 (1): 71-76.
13. Hustedt, F. (1930). Die susswasser flora mitteleuropas, Gustav Fischer, Germany 468 s.
14. Hosmani, S.P. (2013). Freshwater algae as indicators of water quality. Universal Journal of Environment Research Technology, 3 (4): 473-482.
15. Kalyoncu, H. (2002). Aksu çayı'nın fiziksel, kimyasal ve biyolojik olarak incelenmesi. S.D.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora tezi (Basılmış).
16. Kelly, M.G., Cazaubon, A., Coring, E., Dell’Uomo, A., Ector, L., Goldsmith, B., Guasch, H., Hurlimann, J., Jarlman, A., Kawecka, B., Kwandrans, J., Laugaste, R., Lindstrom, E.A., Leitao, M., Marvan, P., Padisàk, J., Pipp, E., Prygiel, J., Rott, E., Sabater, S., van Dam, H., Vizinet, J. (1998a). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10: 215-224.
17. Kelly, M.G. (1998b). Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water research, 32 (1): 236-242.
18. Kelly, M.G., Bennion, H., Cox, E.J., Goldsmith, B., Jamieson, J., Juggins, S., Mann, D.G., Telford, R.J. (2005). Common Freshwater Diatoms of Britain and Ireland: An İnteractive Key. Environment Agency, Bristol.
19. Kıvrak, E., Uygun, A., Kalyoncu, H. (2012). Akarçay'ın (Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye) Su Kalitesini Değerlendirmek için Diyatome İndekslerinin Kullanılması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12 (2): 27-38. King, L., Clarke, G., Bennion, H., Kelly, M., Yallop, M. (2006). Recommendations for sampling littoral diatoms in lakes for ecological status assessments. Journal of applied phycology, 18 (1): 15-25.
20. Krammer, K., Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986, 1988, 1991a, 1991b, 1997a, 1997b, 2000). Bacillariophyceae. Teil: Naviculaceae; Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae; Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae; Achnathaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula und Gomphonema; and english translation of the keys. Süwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2/1-5, Fischer, Stuttgart.
21. Kovács, Cs., Kahlert, M., Padisák, J. (2006). Benthic diatom communities along pH and TP gradients in Hungarian and Swedish streams. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 105–117.
22. Maraşlıoğlu, F., Bektaş, S. (2022). Characterization of Spatiotemporal Variations in Mert Stream Water Quality by Phytoplankton Community and Biological Indices. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25 (1): 42-53.
23. McQuoid, M.R., Godhe, A., Nordberg, K. (2002). Viability of phytoplankton resting stages in the sediments of a coastal Swedish fjord. European journal of Phycology, 37 (2): 191-201.
24. McQuoid, M.R., Hobson, L.A. (1995). Importance of Resting Stages in Diatom Seasonal Succession. Journal of Phycology, 31 (1): 44-50.
25. Ozaner, F.S. (1998). Sinop batısındaki ekosistemler ve ilginç yer şekillerinin jeomorfolojisi, ekoturizm yönünden önemi. TÜBİTAK Yer Deniz Atmosfer Bilimleri ve Çevre Araştırma Grubu, Ankara.
26. Pielou, E.C. (1966). The Measurement of Diversity in Different Types of Biological Collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131-144.
27. Reyes Barbara, I., Martín, G., Reina, M., Arechederra Urrestarazu, A., Serrano Martín, L., Casco, M.A., Toja Santillana, J. (2007). Phytoplankton from NE Doñana marshland (" El Cangrejo Grande", Doñana Natural Park, Spain). Limnetica, 26 (2): 307-318.
28. Sıvacı, E.R. (2013). Nutrient, benthic algae relationships in the Sinop Karagol-Aksaz Marsh, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8 (13): 1129-1135.
29. Round, F.E. (1953). An investigation of two bentic algal communities in Malham Tarn, Yorkshire. Journal of Ecology, 41: 97-174.
30. Round, F.E. (1957). Studies on Bottom-Living Algae in Some Lakes of the English Lake District: Part II. The Distribution of Bacillariophyceae on the Sediments. Journal of Ecology, 45 (2): 343-360.
31. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 144 p.
32. Smol, J.P., Stoermer, E.F. (Eds.) (2010). The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press,686 s.
33. Stevenson, J. (2014). Ecological assessments with algae: a review and synthesis. Journal of Phycology, 50: 437–461.
34. Taş, B., Yılmaz, Ö., Ustaoğlu, F. (2021). Ilıman Bir Türkiye Nehir Havzasında Dere Su Kalitesinin Çok Değişkenli Analiz ve Biyolojik Yaklaşımlarla Değerlendirilmesi. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 17 (1): 34-55.
35. Tırıl, A. (2006). Sulak alanlar. Peyzaj Mimarlari Odasi Yayinlari, 2.
36. Taylor, J.C., Prygiel, J., Vosloo, A., de la Rey, P.A., van Rensburg, L. (2007). Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592: 455–464.
37. Ustaoğlu S., Yardım Ö., Tırıl, A. (2005). Sinop’taki Sulak Alanların (Sarıkum ve Karagöl-Aksaz) Genel Özellikleri ve Koruma Sorunları. Korunan Doğal Alanlar Sempozyumu, 8-10 Eylül, Isparta.
38. Van Dam, H. Mertens, A., Sinkeldam, J. (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 28 (1): 117-133. doi: 10.1007/BF02334251
39. Valentine, V.J. (2002). Scrub-shrub/Emergent Wetland Ecotone Migration Along Delaware tidal Rivers in Response to Relative Sea-Level Change, Natural Impacts, and Human Modifications. (Yayınlanmış Doktora tezi) University of Delaware, Newark, NJ.
40. Vitale, A.J., Genchi S.A., Piccolo, M.C. (2019). Assessing the surface radiation balance and associated components in an intertidal wetland. Journal of Coastal Research, 35 (1): 158-164.
41. Yay, T. E., Özel, B., Tekin Özan, S. (2019). Ulupınar Çayı ve Olimpos Deresi (Antalya) Su Kalitesinin Fizikokimyasal Parametrelere ve Epilitik Diyatomlara Göre Belirlenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10 (2): 111-124.
42. Yusuf, Z. H. (2020). Phytoplankton as bioindicators of water quality in Nasarawa reservoir, Katsina State Nigeria. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 32