Research Article

Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study

Volume: 15 Number: 1 March 1, 2025
EN

Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study

Abstract

Increasing solid waste amount arisen from the urbanization and population growth is an inevitable outcome in many countries. Solid waste has become one of the serious environmental problems and peculiar solid waste pathways are required to prevent contamination of environment. The optimal planning of the waste management should comprise the operations such as minimization, collection, landfilling and recycling of the waste. Also, location selection for landfill of municipal solid waste (MSW) is an effective step even essential, due to growing area shortage for waste disposal. In this respect, landfilling of MSW has been addressed in Tunceli, Turkey using an integrated approach. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy-AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, is utilized to decide the weights of the environmental, technical, economic, and social criteria regarding uncertainty. Then, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is conducted to rank the alternative landfill districts. Finally, the sub locations of selected district are mathematical modelled regarding transport cost, investment cost and demand with an integer linear programming model. The computational results indicate the proposed method effectiveness with a systematic approach by integrating MCDM and mathematical modelling.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfaia, R. G. D. S. M., Costa, A. M., & Campos, J. C. (2017). Municipal solid waste in Brazil: A review. Waste Management & Research, 35(12), 1195-1209.
  2. Ali, S. A., Parvin, F., Al-Ansari, N., Pham, Q. B., Ahmad, A., Raj, M. S., & Thai, V. N. (2021). Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 7528-7550.
  3. Aliahmadi, S. Z., Barzinpour, F., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2020). A fuzzy optimization approach to the capacitated node-routing problem for municipal solid waste collection with multiple tours: A case study. Waste Management & Research, 38(3), 279-290.
  4. Asefi, H., & Lim, S. (2017). A novel multi-dimensional modeling approach to integrated municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1131-1143.
  5. Ayvaz-Cavdaroglu, N., Coban, A., & Firtina-Ertis, I. (2019). Municipal solid waste management via mathematical modeling: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Journal Of Environmental Management, 244, 362-369.
  6. Bertanza, G., Ziliani, E., & Menoni, L. (2018). Techno-economic performance indicators of municipal solid waste collection strategies. Waste Management, 74, 86-97.
  7. Beskese, A., Demir, H. H., Ozcan, H. K., & Okten, H. E. (2015). Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(7), 3513-3521.
  8. Bilgilioglu, S. S., Gezgin, C., Orhan, O., & Karakus, P. (2021). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-17.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Waste Management, Reduction, Reuse and Recycling

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

February 20, 2025

Publication Date

March 1, 2025

Submission Date

April 1, 2024

Acceptance Date

October 9, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 15 Number: 1

APA
Derse, O., & Göçmen Polat, E. (2025). Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 15(1), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1463200
AMA
1.Derse O, Göçmen Polat E. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2025;15(1):147-158. doi:10.21597/jist.1463200
Chicago
Derse, Onur, and Elifcan Göçmen Polat. 2025. “Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15 (1): 147-58. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1463200.
EndNote
Derse O, Göçmen Polat E (March 1, 2025) Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15 1 147–158.
IEEE
[1]O. Derse and E. Göçmen Polat, “Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 147–158, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.21597/jist.1463200.
ISNAD
Derse, Onur - Göçmen Polat, Elifcan. “Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 15/1 (March 1, 2025): 147-158. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1463200.
JAMA
1.Derse O, Göçmen Polat E. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2025;15:147–158.
MLA
Derse, Onur, and Elifcan Göçmen Polat. “Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 147-58, doi:10.21597/jist.1463200.
Vancouver
1.Onur Derse, Elifcan Göçmen Polat. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site Selection: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Mathematical Modelling - A Case Study. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2025 Mar. 1;15(1):147-58. doi:10.21597/jist.1463200

Cited By